120 likes | 206 Views
A/E. Environment. PSU. Overview of Integrating Dedicated Outdoor Air Systems with Parallel Systems. Stanley A. Mumma, Ph.D., P.E. Professor of Architectural Engineering College of Engineering Penn State University @ University Park, PA. Building Thermal and Mechanical Systems Laboratory.
E N D
A/E Environment PSU Overview of IntegratingDedicated Outdoor AirSystems with Parallel Systems Stanley A. Mumma, Ph.D., P.E. Professor of Architectural Engineering College of Engineering Penn State University @ University Park, PA Building Thermal and Mechanical Systems Laboratory
Presentation Outline • Introduction and Objective of this Presentation • Migration Path to a Dedicated OA System • Achieving Dry and Cool OA Economically • Selecting the OA Supply air Conditions • Meeting the Space Sensible Loads with a Parallel System • Integration of the thermal and Fire Suppression Transport Systems
Presentation Objective • Trace the Migration Path to the Dedicated OA Paradigm • Give an Overview Of Integrating Dedicated OA Systems with Parallel Terminal Cooling Systems To Show how the Other Papers in this Symposium Fit Together
The Migration Path toDedicated OA Systems • Ten years of Research and a Dozen Publications, Capped with a 1998 paper that analytically extended the multiple spaces concept of Std. 62 to include: Infiltration, Exfiltration/Exhaust, Interzonal transfer, and Short Circuit paths. • Conclusion, very difficult to verify that Std 62 can or has been met with an all air system. Is a Paradigm shift required?
Design Tool DevelopmentPeer Reviewer Comment • Each separate zone in a building is characterized by 51 variables, 49 of which are time dependent. • The time dependent variables are not known at design, much less in real time. • Reject tool development since of little value to the profession • Supports the earlier conclusion that it is very difficult to verify that an all-air system has met Std. 62.
The Dedicated OA Concept,the new OA paradigm! • Basic concept is to deliver conditioned OA to every space and occupant of the building. • Extension: Use the OA to remove all of the space latent load (primarily from occupants who receive a prescribed flow rate of OA). • By Decoupling the latent and sensible space loads, great flexibility in meeting the parallel sensible loads is realized!
The Paradigm Illustrated. High Aspiration Diffuser 20-30% less OA, Cool/Dry Supply DOAS Unit W/ Energy Recovery Building With Sensible and Latent cooling decoupled Parallel Sensible Cooling System
DOAS Duty • Low outside DPT: Heat or Cool the OA as necessary, and humidify if necessary • High outside DPT: Dehumidification to meet all space latent loads, and reheat if necessary • Dehumidification (Desiccants Not A topic in this symposium) • Details Topic of Paper #2.
Considerations when Selecting the Supply air Conditions • Low Supply air DBT reduces the load on the Parallel System (and 1st cost), but may increase terminal reheat energy use. • Low Supply air DPT reduces the space DPT, allowing the parallel system to operate at lower temp. (higher flux, smaller size, <$) without condensation. • Details subject of Paper #3.
Parallel Sensible Cooling System Options, operating with dry surfaces • All air VAV System • Unitary Equipment • Fan Coils • Ceiling Radiant Cooling Panels, (i.e. Chilled Ceiling). This is the subject of paper #5.
Functional Integration of the Thermal and Fire Suppression Transport Systems • With the Latent Load decoupled from the sensible load, the parallel system could use the uninsulated fire suppression sprinkler piping. • Is it possible, practical, legal? • Paper #4 will address NFPA, trade jurisdiction, economic, and practical issues.
Conclusion, and Basic Pillars of the new Paradigm • Meet ASHRAE Std. 62 with a DOAS. • Decouple the space sensible and latent loads with the DOAS. • Integrate the parallel sensible cooling equipment thermal transport system with the fire suppression system