1 / 15

Grading of Anganwadi Centres

Grading of Anganwadi Centres. Experience sharing by Himachal Pradesh. Need for Grading of AWCs. To have a system of periodic and repeated performance assessment of all AWCs on broad based criteria To pinpoint specific areas of improvement as well as learn from best practices

rinah-hicks
Download Presentation

Grading of Anganwadi Centres

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Grading of Anganwadi Centres Experience sharing by Himachal Pradesh

  2. Need for Grading of AWCs • To have a system of periodic and repeated performance assessment of all AWCs on broad based criteria • To pinpoint specific areas of improvement as well as learn from best practices • To inculcate a sense of competition and therefore improved functioning by CDPOs • To track performance of AWCs / projects as a whole at the State level

  3. Design of performa for Gradingof AWCs • State and Regional level meetings with DPOs/ CDPOs/ Supervisors. • Brainstorming workshop at State level. • Identification of broad indicators. • Weightage to different indicators. • Designing of the FORMAT for grading of AWCs. • Field testing of the FORMAT-efficacy and time taken. • Adoption of the FORMAT and its circulation amongst the CDPOs. • 100 point grading; Grade-I above 80, Grade-II above 70 to 80, Grade-III above 60 to 70 and Grade-IV 60 or below.

  4. Parameters for grading of AWC

  5. Monitoring • All CDPOs to visit at least 10 AWCs in a month for grading of AWCs. • Monthly reports are submitted through DPOs to Directorate on prescribed FORMAT • Information is compiled, processed and analysed at Directorate level. • Interventions are communicated to the DPOs for improvements and achievements of one distt. are conveyed to others for information , guidance and replication.

  6. Status of Grading of AWCs in last 6 months(since inception i.e. Oct; 2005 onwards) • Total functional AWCs 7354 • AWCs Graded 3000 • Grade-I 135 • Grade-II 502 • Grade-III 1057 • Grade-IV 1306

  7. Impact of GRADING • Experience sharing by field functionaries amongst themselves. • Easy identification of bottlenecks / limitations. • Helpful in finding objective basis for corrections/ improvements and proper strategy formulation. • Good measurable instrument for assessing the efforts of ICDS functionaries. • Graduation of AWCs and their upward mobility is monitored through focused efforts. • Easy to indicate areas of improvement to AWWs.

  8. Areas of Improvements/ Issues • Tracking the movement of each AWC from one grade to another and of improvement in each indicator. • Community involvement in grading. • Ensuring regularity in grading • Need to formulate monitorable indicators within identified parameters

More Related