1 / 20

CS 672 Paper Presentation

CS 672 Paper Presentation. “A Survey of Inter-Vehicle Communication” Jun Luo, Jean-Pierre Hubuax EPFL, Switzerland Technical Report IC/2004/24. Presented By Saif Iqbal. IVC - The Big Picture. About Component of Intelligent Transportation System (ITS)

riona
Download Presentation

CS 672 Paper Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CS 672 Paper Presentation “A Survey of Inter-Vehicle Communication” Jun Luo, Jean-Pierre Hubuax EPFL, Switzerland Technical Report IC/2004/24 Presented By Saif Iqbal

  2. IVC - The Big Picture • About • Component of Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) • One of the concrete applications of MANETS • Attracted research attention in US, EU, and Japan • Motivation • Improves road safety and efficiency by increasing the horizon of drivers • and on-board devices • Transmission of road-side information about emergencies, congestion, • etc. • Ability for inter-driver communication • Existing ad hoc networks protocols and experiences can actually be put • to practice

  3. IVC - The Big Picture • Groups & Applications • Association of Electronic Technology for Automobile Traffic and • Driving (JSK), Japan - early 1980’s • CarTALK, EU - 2000 • FleetNet, Germany - 2000 • PATH, California • Chauffeur, EU • DEMO 2000, Japan

  4. IVC – Main Applications Information and Warning Functions Dissemination of road information to distant vehicles Communication-based Longitudinal Control Exploiting “look-through” capacity to avoid accidents, platooning vehicles, etc. Co-operative Assistance Systems Coordinating vehicles at critical points Added-value Applications Internet access, Location-based services, Multiplayer games

  5. Paper • Surveys IVC with respect to key-enabling technologies • Focuses the discussion on the various MAC protocols that are really • important for IVC • Analyzes application requirements and protocols and comes up with • suggestions with regards to the direction of future work • Does not describe applications, but mentions them when their enabling • mechanisms are discussed

  6. Radio Frequency Spectrum • Both infrared and radio waves have been studied and employed • Radio waves: VHF, micro, and millimeter waves • VHF and microwaves are of broadcast type • Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC) spans 75MHz of • spectrum in the 5.9 GHz band • DEMO 2000, Chauffeur used 5.8 GHz DSRC • CarTALK, FleetNet use ULTRA TDD • JSK, PATH, CarTALK have used infrared, typically for cooperative • driving

  7. MAC/PHY Layer • WLAN approach • 802.11, Bluetooth • Plus: inherent support for distributed coordination in ad hoc mode • Minus: low flexibility in radio resource assignment and transmission rate • control • 3G approach • CDMA • Plus: high granularity for data transmission and flexible assignment of • radio resources • Minus: complexity in designing the the coordination function in ad hoc • mode

  8. WLAN • Can directly use WLAN standards for RVC, but does not work as well • for IVC • For migrating to IVC the following problems need to be tackled • -Resistance to more severe multipath effects • -Time synchronization between rapidly moving nodes • -Distributed resource allocation • Token Ring Protocol - PATH • Mechanism to construct, recover, join, and leave a ring • Token circulation, recovery, and multiple token resolution • Solves contention for radio resources • Need further experiments to see if this suitable for IVC

  9. WLAN • Location-based Channel Access (LCA) • Divides the geographical area into cellular structure • Each cell has a unique channel associated with it • Any multiple access scheme like CSMA, CDMA, TDMA can be used • within the cell • Adaptability to high mobility in IVC is a question mark • Non-Persistent CSMA – DOLPHIN/DEMO 2000 • DOLPHIN – Dedicated Omni-purpose inter-vehicle communication • Linkage Protocol for Highway Automation • Non-persistent CSMA outperforms p-persistent one with respect to • packet loss in IVC

  10. 3G • Cannot directly employ it as it is meant for centralized cellular networks • For extending to IVC the following problems need to be addressed • -Distributed radio resource management • -Power control algorithms • -Time synchronization • Solution should rely on distributed media access control • Reservation ALOHA – CarTALK/FleetNet • Use R-ALOHA for distributed channel assignment • High throughput, as a node which catches a slot can use it in subsequent • frames as long as it has packets to send • Frequent reservation attempts due to short packet trains • Due to hidden terminal problem, destructive interference with • established channels may occur • Reliable R-ALOHA lets all nodes know the status of the slots

  11. 3G • Random Access CDMA • Combines CDMA with random channel access – start transmission • immediately irrespective of the state of the channel • Can avoid primary collisions (two nodes with the same code try to • access the channel together) using code assignment, spread-coding • schemes • Multi-access interference (MAI) results in secondary collisions (near-far • problem) at the receiver • Controlled Access CDMA • Uses a modified RTS/CTS mechanism to solve the problem • Split the channel for control and data – RTS/CTS is transferred over • control channels to let the interfering nodes be aware of the status • Use knowledge of power levels to alleviate the near-far problem

  12. MAC/PHY Layer • Summary • Number of MAC protocols proposed, but not all of them are put into • practice • 802.11b is used for demonstration (FleetNet) • 802.11a is chosen by ASTM (American Society for Testing and • Materials) as the basis for DSRC • MAC Protocol based on ULTRA TDD, used in CarTALK, could be • another solution especially in the EU

  13. Network Layer • Any existing position-based routing protocol for ad hoc networks can be • applied to IVC • Can optimize by using location and surrounding awareness information • Mostly group-oriented communications rather than pair-wise • Unicast Routing • Contention-Based Forwarding • Proposes a forwarding scheme avoiding the use of beacons and hence • higher efficiency • Reactive Location Service - FleetNet • Reactive routing protocol by requesting the location of the destination • when sending a packet • Afterwards, a greedy geographical forwarding technique is used

  14. Network Layer • Broadcast Routing • Used to disseminate traffic information • Can be made adaptive – change the inter-transmission interval • Use a randomized interval • Multi-resolution data structure to express information in the message • Summary • Unicast routing is superfluous in most cases • Broadcast routing seems to be a necessary supporting mechanism of • IVC applications • Broadcast routing could also be optimized in various ways

  15. Group Communication • Group communication primitives are important as reliability required for • critical situations, where group information dissemination may not work • Required by two important applications – platooning and cooperative • driving • Localized Group Membership Service (LGMS) • Reduce the group membership service to the local environment of a • node • Only tracks memberships of neighbors and installs a local view at each • node • Works for congestion area detection • Does not support any functions with reliability requirement due to lack • of a global view of the group

  16. Group Communication • Event-based middleware • Supports cooperative mobile applications • Underlying membership service is costly and not really needed • Implemented only on RVC scenarios • The Driving Philosopher Problem • Sharing resources among a group of vehicles • Proposed algorithm solves the model in a synchronous model • Impossible to achieve fairness and concurrency at the same time • Impossible to solve the problem in an asynchronous model • Summary • Important component of IVC • Build the system directly upon the MAC layer • Lightweight membership tracking instead of doing it globally

  17. Security • Driver Ad Hoc Networking Infrastructure (DAHNI) • System mounted on each vehicle which includes both processing and • wireless communication facilities • Each car constitutes a local communication network around itself • Come to the conclusion that no confidentiality is needed, and ignore • privacy concerns • To securely estimate the distance between vehicles, establishment of • symmetric keys is required • Electronic License Plates • Certified identity that a vehicle provides via a wireless link • Usage: Dynamic toll charge, identify culprits, distance estimation • Attacks: Disable system, impersonation, denial of service • Supports cooperative driving

  18. Security • Summary • Security of IVC has been ignored so far by the research community • Some ideas proposed but not followed through and implemented • Emerging and potentially important research topic

  19. Mobility Model • Mobility pattern in IVC is quite different from the “random waypoint” • model used for ad hoc networks simulation • Simulations for MAC protocols should also take mobility into account • which is not necessarily the case with traditional MAC • There are proposed tools for traffic simulation to help extend the • network simulators • Application context has to be taken into account before choosing a • mobility model to evaluate certain protocols • Mathematical Modeling for Traffic • Microscopic – suitable for simulating group communications • Macroscopic – for routing protocols discussion • Statistical – real mobility pattern is in 2-d or 3-d space, approach based • on Markov chain theory

  20. Conclusion • Design of communication protocols in IVC is extremely challenging • Ad hoc routing protocols, and group communication primitives • migrated from wired networks might not be efficient • Most of the proposed work is in routing algorithms and MAC • Routing protocols are unnecessary in most cases • Local distributed coordination functions sitting directly upon the • MAC would be more efficient • As vehicles become “smarter”, security and privacy gain importance • Mathematical models for road traffic are important for simulations

More Related