1 / 17

CEFR: its educational and political background

CEFR: its educational and political background. John Trim ACTFL-CEFR Symposium June 21-22, ECML Graz, Austria. The educational background. Classical (Greek and Roman) grammar The Trivium: grammar, logic and rhetoric Renaissance and reformation: Comenius National language standardisation

rkeister
Download Presentation

CEFR: its educational and political background

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CEFR:its educational and political background John Trim ACTFL-CEFR SymposiumJune 21-22, ECML Graz, Austria

  2. www.ecml.at The educational background • Classical (Greek and Roman) grammar • The Trivium: grammar, logic and rhetoric • Renaissance and reformation: Comenius • National language standardisation • Introduction of modern languages at school • The neogrammarians and modernist reform • Structuralism and behaviourism • The communicative approach

  3. www.ecml.at Jan Amos Komenský (Comenius) 1592-1670LinguarumMethodusNovissima(1648) • Education is necessary to find one’s way through the ‘labyrinth of appearances’. • So, education is lifelong and for all: male and female, all ages, all classes. • Language is fundamental to education, the key to understanding the harmony of God’s creation. It includes: • literacy and oracy in the mother tongue • the language of a neighbouring people • a language for general international use (Latin) • Language learning follows (sensory) experience, understanding and action. Its progress resembles the exploration of a mansion: vestibulum, janua, atrium, thesaurus. It should be enjoyable, playful and practical. Grammatical rules are then useful to reinforce understanding

  4. www.ecml.at The classical and modern paradigmssome contrasts: 1 Aims: Classical: to gain access to higher culture Modern: to join the language community Objectives: Classical: to develop a strict mental discipline Modern: to develop communicative ability Attitudes to language: Classical: puristic Modern: naturalistic Type of language to learn: Classical: the best, correct form of cultivated usage Modern: everyday usage

  5. www.ecml.at The classical and modern paradigmssome contrasts: 2 Preferred medium: Classical: priority to written language Modern: priority to spoken language Model presented: Classical: works of good authors Modern: full range of (native) usage Text-types: Classical: Literary and philosophical writings Modern: newspapers, broadcasts, popular writings

  6. www.ecml.at The classical and modern paradigmssome contrasts: 3 Criteria for expression: Classical: careful, controlled, accurate Modern: spontaneous, fluent, appropriate Criteria for comprehension: Classical: detailed, exact Modern: extracting relevant information Relation of knowledge to action: Classical: knowledge is fundamental Modern: action is fundamental Criteria for success: Classical: error-free performance; proof of knowledge Modern: success in communicating meaning

  7. www.ecml.at The classical and modern paradigmssome contrasts: 4 Skill development: Classical: translation and essay writing Modern: balanced development of 4 skills Work style: Classical: individual study, receptive, reactive Modern: group interaction, active, participatory Relation among learners: Classical: competitive Modern: co-operative

  8. www.ecml.at The classical and modern paradigmssome contrasts: 5 Approach to learning: Classical: subject-centred Modern: learner-centred Role of teacher: Classical: authoritative and authoritarian Modern: facilitation of learning Teaching style: Classical: magisterial Modern: animating

  9. www.ecml.at The classical and modern paradigmssome contrasts: 6 Means employed: Classical: lectures, grammatical exposition, exercises, reading and translation of texts, essays Modern: experiment, discovery, games, simulations, projects, discussion Language of instruction and class management: Classical: mother tongue Modern: target language

  10. www.ecml.at The classical and modern paradigmssome contrasts: 7 Approach to grammar: Classical: a systematic body of rules to be learnt and observed Modern: a means to organise words so as to construct and convey meaning Approach to meaning: Classical: fixed concepts, properly represented by words and well-formed sentences Modern: negotiated interpretation of texts in context

  11. www.ecml.at The classical and modern paradigmssome contrasts: 8 Concept of culture: Classical: the training and refinement of mind, taste and manners Modern: the beliefs, attitudes and values which inform a society Social values: Classical: aristocratic, meritocratic, élitist Modern: democratic, populist Attitudes to change: Classical: conservative, retrospective Modern: innovative, prospective

  12. www.ecml.at The classical and modern paradigmssome contrasts: 9 Where stronger: Classical: grammar schools, ‘public’ (i.e.private) schools, older, prestigious universities Modern: comprehensive schools, newer universities Claimed to be: Classical: humanistic, serious, deep, scholarly Modern: practical, realistic, balanced, dynamic Accused of being: Classical: Remote from life, élitist, over-intellectualised, impractical Modern: utilitarian, reductionist, banal, superficial

  13. www.ecml.at The political background CEFR is situated in the Council of Europe’s programme under the Convention on Cultural Co-operation and serves its political aims: • Defence and extension of human rights • Defence and promotion of participatory, pluralist democracy • Facilitation of international co-operation in dealing with all social and cultural problems

  14. www.ecml.at Aims of Council of Europe language policy • to facilitate the free movement of people, information and ideas • to build up mutual understanding and acceptance of cultural and linguistic diversity • to promote the personal development of the individual • to make the process of learning itself more democratic • to provide a framework for close and effective international co-operation

  15. www.ecml.at Consequences for the CEFR: 1 • CEFR accepts and serves the basic aims of the Council of Europe • CEFR has a communicative, learner-centred orientation. • CEFR aims to inform and empower, not to direct. • CEFR was conceived within a modernist approach, but sees a place for some elements of classicism where appropriate

  16. www.ecml.at Consequences for the CEFR: 2 CEFR respects the right of all practitioners to take decisions on objectives and methods within their competence, expecting them to: • Respond appropriately to the needs, motivations, characteristics, resources and situations of learners • Inform themselves and use their intelligence and judgment in deciding between alternatives • Be prepared to evaluate, justify, discuss their practice and be open-minded, willing to change iff convinced

  17. www.ecml.at Consequences for the CEFR: 3 The tripartite structure of CEFR aims to support decision-takers at all levels by: • providing a systematic, comprehensive overview of the actions and competences required of a competent adult language user for effective communication • setting out, without recommending any, the methodological options for language learning, teaching and assessment, as a basis for independent reflection and selection • providing a scaling of language proficiency and, where possible, its elements, to assist planning and encourage transparency

More Related