1 / 14

Too late for mainstreaming? Taking stock in Brussels

Too late for mainstreaming? Taking stock in Brussels. A.E. Woodward Vesalius College, Vrije Universiteit Brussel Gender Mainstreaming: Theoretical Approaches and Innovative Strategies Università della Calabria 2 December 2005. Center for Women’s Studies and Diversity Research.

rob
Download Presentation

Too late for mainstreaming? Taking stock in Brussels

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Too late for mainstreaming? Taking stock in Brussels A.E. Woodward Vesalius College, Vrije Universiteit Brussel Gender Mainstreaming: Theoretical Approaches and Innovative Strategies Università della Calabria 2 December 2005 Center for Women’s Studies and Diversity Research

  2. Some Northern European Experience with Mainstreaming • Taking stock of practical experience is not done frequently enough • Looking at Belgium and her participation in international projects, we can learn something about mainstreaming • Review of Van Roemberg and Spee (2004), Kingdom of Belgium (2004), Facon, Hondeghem and Nelen (2004), Silvera, et. al. (2003) and Braithwaite (2005) provides some lessons • Van Roemberg and Spee: an expert view • Kingdom of Belgium- progress towards Beijing Platform goals? • Facon et.al. Comparing UK, NL, and Flanders • Silvera, et. al. Mainstreaming in trade unions • Braithwaite-Equalpol- integrated mainstreaming?? • And finally the MAGEEQ project... Center for Women’s Studies and Diversity Research

  3. The advantages of mainstreaming? • Brand recognition • Institutionalization • New governance tools • Novelty • Its value in terms of addressing gender equality. Mainstreaming provides a tool to transform gender relations through public policy and seems to answer a problem in gender theory, what some feminists call the ‘Wollstonecraft dilemma’ in policy, a reflection of the Equality/Difference debate Center for Women’s Studies and Diversity Research

  4. Disadvantages of mainstreaming? • Challenging the status quo • Expense • Spreading of resources • Misunderstanding of concept - translation • Coupling of ‘gender’ and mainstreaming blocks other kinds of inequalities Center for Women’s Studies and Diversity Research

  5. External Threats to Gender Mainstreaming • Issue attention cycle • Popularity of idea- adapted by other groups • Stability of political support when government changes • Reconfiguration of equality landscape Center for Women’s Studies and Diversity Research

  6. Reconfiguration of equal opportunities in Europe: from national to transnational and from transnational to trans-issue • New legal framework focusing on discrimination • New elements of global discourse of social justice, human rights, • Political challenges of multi-cultural societies • A changing set of nations (Scandinavian, the new 10) make present European equality landscape different • New issues are raised by transnationality and trans-issue identity coalitions

  7. What chance mainstreaming in the new landscape? • Gender mainstreaming seen as a success and to be copied • The problems of gender mainstreaming will be multiplied in diversity-land • The logics of anti-discrimination and of gender mainstreaming are different • Social justice • versus Pro active approach - no victim • How strong is civil society in a trans-issue format? Center for Women’s Studies and Diversity Research

  8. Optimism? Anglo-Saxon Europe? • Openness for cross- or intersectional approaches • Feminist theory and diversity • Need for a European epistemological commnity around equality issues similar to that that is around gender • Diversity needs a face but should not push out gender Center for Women’s Studies and Diversity Research

  9. A place for gender…? • As Jo Shaw writes • a remaining obstacle to the adoption of a broad-based equality and diversity mainstreaming approach across the grounds identified in Article 13 EC is the continued adherence in that context to the language of (direct and indirect) discrimination…a broader based approach is needed to deal with social issues such as racism and xenophobia as much as it is needed to deal with inequality on grounds of gender (Shaw 2004: 24) Center for Women’s Studies and Diversity Research

  10. A place for gender…? • Diversity, I find that a nice concept… That is actually more equal than gender in the manner of speaking that it also brings other, for example the relation between Belgian/migrant and others, that sort of element, culture, the multicultural and such, that is contained. So it is an important concept, but gender is a part of it, which has its own specific identity. The danger is that the parts, the components of the concept diversity will lose their own identity. That can’t happen. I find that important, it cannot just disappear… (van Roemberg and Spee 2004:61) Center for Women’s Studies and Diversity Research

More Related