1 / 13

Entrepreneurship Indicators Project

Entrepreneurship Indicators Steering Group Project Governance Proposed Mandate, Goals and Operational Arrangements Tim Davis, OECD Statistics Directorate EISG Meeting, Rome, December 5/6, 2006. Entrepreneurship Indicators Project. Background Mandate Goals Operational Arrangements

robertfsmith
Download Presentation

Entrepreneurship Indicators Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Entrepreneurship Indicators Steering Group Project GovernanceProposed Mandate, Goals and Operational ArrangementsTim Davis, OECD Statistics DirectorateEISG Meeting, Rome, December 5/6, 2006

  2. Entrepreneurship Indicators Project • Background • Mandate • Goals • Operational Arrangements • Membership • Meetings • Communications/coordination • Bureau • Next steps/Questions

  3. BackgroundWhy a Steering Group? • Ensure relevance and feasibility • Facilitate meetings and communications • “Share the load” • Encourage “buy in” and support (financial or intellectual) • Project gets lost on Committee or WP agendas • Funding agreement(s) request “Governance Structure” • Preliminary step in establishing a structure for funding and management of an international survey? (Like PISA)

  4. Proposed Mandate • Provide advice and direction to the EIP on the establishment of the Work Programme and priorities • Advise and assist the EIP on all activities to be carried out under the Work Programme; • Serve as forum for consensus on all aspects of Entrepreneurship Indicators development so that meaningful comparisons can be made across countries;

  5. Proposed Mandate • Organise and coordinate inputs by experts and consultants from OECD member countries; • Ensure coordination of the EIP work with that of other OECD groups and relevant international bodies; • Promote support for the Project from OECD member countries and other relevant bodies.

  6. Goals • Establish an ongoing program • Approve and oversee a Work Programme

  7. Membership • 20 to 25 persons • Statistical and entrepreneurship policy experts • A sub-set of OECD countries; Active membership • Geographical balance • Establish initial, key international comparisons

  8. Current Participants • Canada • Finland • Italy • Netherlands • UK • EC • Luxembourg • Australia • Denmark • Germany • Korea • New Zealand • USA Potentially • France • Statistical members outnumber others

  9. Meetings • Two “physical” meetings per year • Default location is Paris • Are back-to-back meetings preferred? • Secretariat will identify other relevant meetings • Members’ suggestions welcomed • Also conference calls and electronic communications

  10. Communications and Coordination • Many have asked for ongoing information • Hence “EIP Network” will send Agendas, Papers etc • List to be established by Secretariat in December • Members to add names • Members encouraged to communicate with entire Steering Group

  11. Coordination Links • Semi-formal links to OECD: • Committee on Industry, Innovation and Entrepreneurship • Working Party on SMEs and Entrepreneurship • International Consortium for Entrepreneurship (ICE) • IPREG • UNECE • World Bank • European Foundation for Entrepreneurial Research • Kauffman Foundation • Global Entrepreneurship Monitor • Other?

  12. Bureau and Support • Elect or reconfirm Bureau every year • Initial Bureau to consist of: • Chair • Two Vice Chairs Support • Support is provided by “Secretariat” (EIP)

  13. Governance paper: Next Steps/Questions • Elect a Bureau • Approve a Governance structure paper for submission to Statistics Committee, WPSME, CIIE and Kauffman • Is a more elaborate structure needed to finance and run actual surveys, like PISA • Extend membership/activities to non-OECD members • Do we need more members • More non-statistics members • Is meeting schedule satisfactory?

More Related