230 likes | 250 Views
Predicting Major Outcomes after MCSD Implant. Risk Factors for Death, Transplant, and Recovery James Kirklin, MD David Naftel, PhD. Predicting Major Outcomes after MCSD Implant. Two approaches:
E N D
Predicting Major Outcomes after MCSD Implant • Risk Factors for Death, Transplant, and Recovery • James Kirklin, MD • David Naftel, PhD
Predicting Major Outcomes after MCSD Implant • Two approaches: • Simultaneous parametric modeling of the probabilities of the time related events based on a patient’s risk factors • Simultaneous non-parametric estimation of the probabilities of the time related events based on sub-groups of patients
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 Instantaneous Rate (Hazard) of Outcomes Outcome Death Transplant Recovery Outcome/Month Death Transplant Recovery n at risk: 9359 6195 4024 2736 1820 1194 711 408 174 Months post implant
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 Event: Transplantation (censored at death or recovery) Device Strategy at Time of Implant Destination Therapy BTT Unlikely BTT Mod Likely % Freedom from Transplantation BTT Likely % Free from Device Strategy n txpl TXPL at 1 yr BTT Listed 2473 1188 56% BTT Likely 2140 801 67% BTT Mod Likely 958 178 83% BTT Unlikely 299 35 90% Destination Therapy 3370 190 95% BTT Listed Months post implant
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 Instantaneous Rate (Hazard) of Outcomes Outcome Death Transplant Recovery Outcome/Month Death Transplant Recovery n at risk: 9359 6195 4024 2736 1820 1194 711 408 174 Months post implant
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 Continuous Flow LVAD I N T E R M A C S L E V E L S Device Strategy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BTT: Listed BTT: Likely BTT: Moderately BTT: Unlikely DT
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 Continuous Flow LVAD I N T E R M A C S L E V E L S Device Strategy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BTT: Listed BTT: Likely BTT: Moderately BTT: Unlikely DT
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 CFLVAD BTT Listed LEVEL 1, n= 317 Outcome % at 1 year Alive (device in place) 47% Transplanted 38% Dead 13% Recovery 1% Proportion of Patients Months after Implant
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 Continuous Flow LVAD I N T E R M A C S L E V E L S Device Strategy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BTT: Listed BTT: Likely BTT: Moderately BTT: Unlikely DT
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 CFLVAD Destination Therapy LEVEL 1, n=344 Outcome % at 1 year Alive (device in place) 63% Transplanted 4% Dead 31% Recovery 2% Proportion of Patients Months after Implant
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 CFLVAD Destination Therapy LEVEL 2, n=1128 Outcome % at 1 year Alive (device in place) 70% Transplanted 3% Dead 26% Recovery 1% Proportion of Patients Months after Implant
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 CFLVAD Destination Therapy LEVEL 3, n=1081 Outcome % at 1 year Alive (device in place) 73% Transplanted 4% Dead 22% Recovery 1% Proportion of Patients Months after Implant
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 CFLVAD Destination Therapy LEVELS 4-7, n=749 Outcome % at 1 year Alive (device in place) 76% Transplanted 3% Dead 21% Recovery 1% Proportion of Patients Months after Implant
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 CFLVAD BTT Listed LEVEL 2, n=1084 Outcome % at 1 year Alive (device in place) 46% Transplanted 40% Dead 13% Recovery 1% Proportion of Patients Months after Implant
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 CFLVAD BTT Listed LEVEL 3, n= 604 Outcome % at 1 year Alive (device in place) 51% Transplanted 39% Dead 9% Recovery 1% Proportion of Patients Months after Implant
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 CFLVAD BTT Listed LEVELS 4-7, n=394 Outcome % at 1 year Alive (device in place) 45% Transplanted 42% Dead 12% Recovery 1% Proportion of Patients Months after Implant
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 Competing Outcomes Analysis for Continuous Flow LVADs % at 1 year Alive n Death Transplant Recovery (a device in place) Destination Therapy, n=3302 Level 1 344 31% 4% 2% 63% Level 2 1128 26% 3% 1% 70% Level 3 1081 22% 4% 1% 73% Levels 4-7 749 21% 3% 1% 76% BTT: Listed, n=2399 Level 1 317 13% 38% 1% 47% Level 2 1084 13% 40% 1% 46% Level 3 604 9% 39% 1% 51% Levels 4-7 394 12% 42% 1% 45%
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 TAH BTT Listed LEVEL 1, n=47 Outcome % at 1 year Alive (device in place) 9% Transplanted 59% Dead 32% (Recovery 0%) Proportion of Patients Months after Implant
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 TAH BTT Listed LEVEL 2, n=75 Outcome % at 1 year Alive (device in place) 11% Transplanted 70% Dead 19% (Recovery 0%) Proportion of Patients Months after Implant
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 Event: Death (censored at transplantation or recovery) n=9359, Deaths=2280 • Months % Survival • 1 95% • 12 80% • 24 69% • 59% • 48 47% % Survival Deaths/months Hazard (early + late) n at risk: 9359 6195 4024 2736 1820 1194 711 408 174 Months post implant
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 Event: Transplantation (censored at death or recovery) n=9359, Transplants= 2422 • % Freedom • Months from TXPL • 1 99% • 12 76% • 24 62% • 56% • 48 52% % Freedom from Transplantation Transplants/months Hazard (early + constant) n at risk: 9359 6195 4024 2736 1820 1194 711 408 174 Months post implant
Continuous Flow LVAD/BiVAD Implants: 2008 – 2013, n=9359 Event: Recovery (censored at death or transplantation) n=9360, Recovery= 89 • % Freedom • Months from Recovery • 1 100% • 12 99% • 24 98% • 97% • 48 96% % Freedom from Recovery Recovery/months Hazard (constant) n at risk: 9359 6195 4024 2736 1820 1194 711 408 174 Months post implant