250 likes | 403 Views
2. Overview. Challenge of Broad Compound ClaimCompound Enablement Considerations/In re WandsEnabled vs. Non-enabled InventionCompound Examples Support of DisclosurePossible Ways to Rebut RejectionComposition and ?method of use" examples. 3. Typical Compound Claim. Claims are directed to a b
E N D
1. 1 Enablement Issues in Pharmaceutical Claims Joseph K. McKane
Supervisory Patent Examiner
Art Unit 1626
571-272-0699
Ardin Marschel
Supervisory Patent Examiner
Art Unit 1614
571-272-0718
2. 2 Overview Challenge of Broad Compound Claim
Compound Enablement Considerations/In re Wands
Enabled vs. Non-enabled Invention
Compound Examples
Support of Disclosure
Possible Ways to Rebut Rejection
Composition and “method of use” examples
3. 3 Typical Compound Claim Claims are directed to a broad genus of compounds including “R” groups, variables, and other types of combinations and permutations which are defined around some type of core structure.
- Example
- Markush type claim.
- Multiple variable core – core may be a heterocyclic ring consisting of oxygen, nitrogen, sulphur and carbon atoms in different positional combinations.
4. 4 Examiner/Applicant Challenge How can we limit the scope of the allowed genus of compounds so that it provides reasonable protection for applicant’s invention? Is there unpredictability/undue experimentation in today’s drug discovery?