1 / 6

Restitution du groupe de travail «Suivi / Evaluation »

Restitution du groupe de travail «Suivi / Evaluation ». President: MBW Dogo-Muhammed Facilitateurs: Francois Diop, World Bank Seni Kouanda, IRSS Secretary: Tesfaye Ashagari Rapporteurs: Lisa NICHOLS, USAID/ ATN Plus, Mali. Leçons opérationnelles principales (1).

rod
Download Presentation

Restitution du groupe de travail «Suivi / Evaluation »

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Restitution du groupe de travail «Suivi / Evaluation » President: MBW Dogo-Muhammed Facilitateurs: Francois Diop, World Bank Seni Kouanda, IRSS Secretary: Tesfaye Ashagari Rapporteurs: Lisa NICHOLS, USAID/ ATN Plus, Mali

  2. Leçons opérationnelles principales (1) • Decisions are made politically by politicians who sometimes do not have evidence but are pressured to make a decision therefore there is no time to develop M&E system; • Baseline data is often not available prior to the intervention; it is a luxury due to time constraints and political pressure to initiate policies; • Data is available from HMIS about service use, etc. but financial data is often missing and there is not enough information on financing.

  3. Leçons opérationnelles principales (2) • Systematic development of M&E with quality internal and external component information needed; • Many initiatives don’t have a framework for evaluation which makes it difficult to appreciate the impact of the initiative and the causal links.

  4. Recommandations aux décideurs politiques • A framework for evaluation can help to provide structure to a program and a common understanding of goal/ objectives, inputs, outputs, outcomes, etc. Also develop consensus on a small, common set of indicators. • Health policy analysis should be part of M&E; when it comes to financing should include periodic PERs, NHA and Benefit Incidence Analysis • A budget should be allocated for tools for rapid/routine data collection from clinical level on: drugs, health worker performance, financing flows (money/time), service use. • M&E systems should be consolidated to reduce data collection burden and harmonize use. • M&E results should be made public to allow for informed decision making

  5. Recommandations aux PTF • Advocate to promote more investment in evaluation and to facilitate evaluation (10% of activity/program budgets) • Emphasize training and capacity building in M&E and development of tools/manuals • User friendly/disaggregated/prioritized systems should be put in place

  6. Priorités pour les experts • Harmonized, user friendly tools are needed. Tools should collect data that can be disaggregate and information should be prioritized. • Capacity building for the development and use other techniques and surveys should be carried out to overcome lack of data or baseline information; for example, mid-term evaluations, combining information requirements into existing household surveys • We need to develop other ways of assessing / evaluating if the most vulnerable and poorest populations are being reached.

More Related