1 / 14

Relationship Contracting: The Main Roads’ Perspective

Relationship Contracting: The Main Roads’ Perspective. Alan McLennan. Why is Relationship Contracting Topical? Success with full Alliance Contracts e.g. Norman River Bridge Alliance “principles” helpful in internal Main Roads Projects.

roden
Download Presentation

Relationship Contracting: The Main Roads’ Perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Relationship Contracting:The Main Roads’ Perspective Alan McLennan

  2. Why is Relationship Contracting Topical? • Success with full Alliance Contracts e.g. Norman River Bridge • Alliance “principles” helpful in internal Main Roads Projects. • Success of relationship management on the Pacific Motorway.

  3. Why do we need to develop Relationship Contracting? • Industry reaction to contracting “failures”: • ACA “Relationship Contracting” proposals • Construction Queensland – a more equitable form of contract • Main Roads “Failures”: • Cost over runs • Difficulty in managing the Roads Program • Poor and unacceptable quality • Poor relations, blame culture • Waste of emotional energy in adversarial conflicts • There has to be a better way.

  4. What is the Present State? • Main Roads history of success in Contract Management. • “One size fits all” type of Contract OK for normal road projects, with single objective. • Recent years, larger projects becoming very complex: • community involvement • political pressures • native title • environmental issues • traffic management etc. etc. • Now, poor alignment between inflexible AS2124 contract and complex projects. • Traditional contracts lead to separation and adversarial behaviours.

  5. Reflections of Pacific Motorway • Largest project ever undertaken by Main Roads • 43km : 8 and 6 lanes • $750m • “World Class” • “traditional” contracting • Project is extremely complex • 4 years from conception • 85,000 vehicles per day • Interaction with community • Difficult site conditions • Major service relocations etc. • Contractual relations became stressed • Variations, claims • Self-serving behaviours • Adversarial relations • Quality issues, under strain of time, cost, quality equasion

  6. Reflections of Pacific Motorway (cont.) • Respond by creating Relationship Management Unit • Separate to Contract • Re-establish supremacy of project goals • Engender commitment to goals • Focus on delivery • Strengthen relationships first • Relationship Processes • Partnering agreements, charters • Constant follow–up • Outcomes • Provided essential forum to relate and negotiate • Maintained central focus on achievement • Regular evaluation demonstrated steady improvement in relations • On-going role in resolution of issues • Fostered 2 major contractual changes i.e. transitions to alliances

  7. A possible Future State • Project performance will be measured in 4 quadrants of Balanced Scorecard. • Success will include: • excellence in all IMP objectives • win:win:win outcomes • enduring relations • improvement and learning • Relationship Contracting Form: • relevant to a wide range of projects • suitable for complex projects • flexible • satisfies many objectives simultaneously • co-operative relationships

  8. Features of Relationship Contracts • Mutual commitment to project vision, mission and objectives. • Success measured across several objectives. • Win:win:win. • Balanced application of relationship management and project management. • Innovative contractual arrangements. • Client leadership; informed buyer. • Recognition and rewards.

  9. Application in Main Roads • Relationship Contracting applies across spectrum • Alliance Contracts for: • very complex projects • many stakeholders • many objectives, e.g. community • Relationship Contracts for: • moderately complex • several objectives • range of constraints • Traditional Contracting for: • straight-forward projects • contractors well experienced

  10. Spectrum of Contract forms RelationshipContracting Traditional Special Relationship Alliance Hard $ Contracts Contracts Contracts - positive alignment steps - partnering processes - relational skills - improvement processes

  11. A Special Relationship Contract Package for Main Roads: • Key elements: • Alignment between contract provisions and relationship processes • Partnering process - a co-operative single team. • Relationship skills, attitudes and values. • Review, evaluate, improve.

  12. Conclusions • Relationship Contracting is one way to address contract “failures”. • Traditional contracts not best suited for complex, multi-objective projects. • Relationship and Alliance Contracting have potential for Main Roads. • A flexible form of Relationship Contracting is being developed. • Pilot projects will be used in development. • Concepts apply equally to Design and Planning Contracts.

More Related