1 / 24

E-Infrastructures and Data Management Collaborative Research Action

E-Infrastructures and Data Management Collaborative Research Action. Phase 1. Agenda. Objectives and Broader I mpacts E-Infrastructures and Data Management CRA Overview Assembly and Role of the Work Packages Deliverables. E-infrastructures and Data Management.

rogan-cardenas
Download Presentation

E-Infrastructures and Data Management Collaborative Research Action

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. E-Infrastructures and Data Management Collaborative Research Action Phase 1

  2. Agenda • Objectives and Broader Impacts • E-Infrastructures and Data Management CRA Overview • Assembly and Role of the Work Packages • Deliverables

  3. E-infrastructures and Data Management “….the need to address global environmental challenges requires a more coordinated approach to the planning, implementation, and management of data, analytics and E-Infrastructures” through international collaboration. - Belmont Forum, New Delhi, February 2013

  4. Key Objectives: Coordination and Collaboration • Create a ‘space’ (Knowledge Hub) foster integrated communitiesthat are better able to collaborate on e-infrastructure challenges • Build on international teams and partnerships that can effectively work with civil society to co-design e-infrastructures, data management and data-analytical challenges Objectives and Broader Impacts

  5. Key Objectives:Community Strategy and Implementation Plan • Identify strategic science policies, outlining what can be done better, in a multilateral way, to support global change research • Vision that clearly expresses global e-infrastructure needs, barriers and gaps • Informs stakeholders • Prioritizesaction to address the interoperability challenges • Integratesexisting national and international research in order to promote more holistic environmental support systems Objectives and Broader Impacts

  6. Community Strategy & Implementation Plan • Recommendations could consist of one or more funding calls (CRAs) and/or policies/procedural changes: • Actions that produce quick wins leading to recognizable results • Strategicleverage points to make a big difference with small sums of money or policy changes • Analysis of funding mechanisms that best sustain e-infrastructures • Strategic community-buildinginitiatives around data infrastructures • Process to engage the BF in the co-design of future CRAsto keep pace with changing global e-infrastructure landscape Objectives and Broader Impacts

  7. Broader Impacts Recommendations from this project could changehow the BF operates by promoting a more coordinated approach,in terms of policies, procedures and funding mechanisms, to support e-infrastructures in a more sustainable way Objectives and Broader Impacts

  8. Broader Impacts (continued) If successful, this project will help the BF achieve collective impact, by identifying: • Ashared agenda around which BF agencies can organize to better support global e-infrastructure • Mutually reinforcing activities to achieve the shared agenda • How the BF can strategicallymobilize funding, coordinate community-building/outreach, facilitate dialogue between partners, and guide overall strategic direction Objectives and Broader Impacts

  9. Broader Impacts (continued) • Small changes in how the BF operates could lead to big impacts globally • Potential to leverage domestic programs of member agencies to have an even greater impact Objectives and Broader Impacts

  10. Multi-Phase Collaborative Research Action (CRA) Phase I: September 2013 – April 2015 • Series of collaborative scoping activities instead of a competitive call for small grants • Focus on reducing the risk of fragmenting existing communities and excluding important players • Produce a Community Strategy and Implementation Plan Phase II: Starts in 2015/2016 • Begin delivering on Implementation Plan based on input from the Knowledge Hub activities • Depends on outcomes of Phase I and funding agency participation • May include a funding call to implement the strategies and vision fromPhase I E-Infrastructures and Data Management CRA Overview

  11. Participating Countries Australia Brazil European Commission France Germany Int’l Council for Science • Italy • Japan • South Africa • UK • USA • GEO/GEOSS* *Not a Belmont Forum Member; acting as a participant-observer in Phase 1 of this CRA.

  12. Phase I Overview • International Steering Committee • 1 member per country or international organization • Members lead six Work Packages (WPs) / working groups • National delegations = Assembly • ~ 10 members per country ~ 120 people • Project Secretariat – jointly funded by US (NSF) and UK (NERC) • Knowledge Hub Web platform (www.bfe-inf.org)

  13. Phase I Timeline • October 2013: Steering Committee Meeting in Windsor, UK, to define WPs and WP leadership • November 2013 – February 2014: Finalize WP workplans and populate WPs with Assembly members • August 1, 2014: WPs provide a report on preliminary findings to the Secretariat • Late August/early September 2014: Steering Committee meeting to synthesize WP findings into a cohesive interim report • September 15, 2014: Interim report due to the Belmont Forum E-Infrastructures and Data Management CRA Overview

  14. Phase I Timeline (Continued) • October 8-10, 2014: Belmont Forum Plenary Meeting in Beijing, China to decide CRAs released in 2015 • December 12-14, 2014: SC meeting in San Francisco, USA prior to AGU 2014 • January 2015: Draft Community Strategy and Implementation Plan due to the Belmont Forum Principals • March/April 2015: Final Community Strategy and Implementation Plan due to the Belmont Forum Principals E-Infrastructures and Data Management CRA Overview

  15. Assembly 120 + experts • ~10 per country • Divided into 6 Work Packages (WPs) • end-user domain scientists • computer and information scientists • legal experts • social scientists

  16. Work Packages • Architecture and Interoperability • WP1: Data Integration for Multidisciplinary Research • WP2: Improved interface between the computation and data infrastructures • WP3: Harmonization of global data infrastructure for sharing environmental data • Governance • WP4: Data Sharing • WP5: Open Data • WP6: Capacity Building (cross-cutting) Assembly and Role of the Work Packages

  17. Work Packages: Inter-Relationships WP4: Data Sharing WP5: Open Data WP1: Data Integration for Multidisciplinary Research WP3: Harmonization of global data infrastructure for sharing environmental data WP2: Interface between computation and data infrastructures WP6: Capacity Building (Cross-Cutting)

  18. Role of the Assembly Members and Work Packages • Provide evidence to support recommendations on how the BF can best support e-infrastructure • Each individual: • Brings a unique area of expertise, so all contributions are critical and valuable • Should draw on her or his knowledge/expertise to identify existing capabilities, gaps and remaining research challenges in both technical and governance arenas • Already participates in a number of international and national initiatives, and so can take a holistic view Assembly and Role of the Work Packages

  19. Focusing the Work Packages • Leverage existing resources/partnerships/investments/initiatives • DON’T reinvent the wheel • There are already international programs that promote best practice in parts of environmental science • WPs should decide which parts require additional funding, and where there are still gaps between existing programs • Each WP is asked to consider its area of focus, and, with the collective experience of the participants, consider: • Which activities are addressed adequately and DO NOT require further attention • Which activities are not addressed adequately and DO require further attention • For areas that require further support, considerhow support is best provided Assembly and Role of the Work Packages

  20. Deliverables • Interim Report • Due September 15, 2014 • Community Strategy and Implementation Plan • Draft due in January 2015 • Final due in March/April 2015 • Work Package Deliverables • Due prior to interim report (August 1, 2014) • Due prior to draft and final versions of the Plan Deliverables

  21. Interim Report • The BF requires an interim report prior to their meeting in Beijing, China, October 8-10 in order to: • Flag emerging issues and preliminary recommendations that may include one or more funding calls (CRAs) • Allow the BF enough time to release a CRA(s) in 2015, should that be a preliminary recommendation • Accommodate funding agencies’ annual budget deadlines, which influence when CRAs are released • Engage the BF in the co-design of any future CRA(s) to prevent a long gap between submitting and acting upon recommendations Deliverables

  22. Work Packages: Deliverables • Initial WP deliverables are due by August 1, 2014: • Review of the existing situation/lay of the land in each WP focus area(s) • Identify the need to take action in a particular area: What are the issues that need to be addressed and why? • Identify whether a CRA could address this issue. If so, how? • Identify strategic policies or actions that BF could take to address this issue • Final deliverables for the Plan will consist of concrete evidence to support recommendations Deliverables

  23. Quick Links for More Information • www.belmontforum.org • www.bfe-inf.org • https://twitter.com/BFE_Inf

  24. Questions?

More Related