1 / 10

EVALUATION OF CORNEAL PARAMETERS IN KERATOCONUS DIAGNOSTICS USING A SCHEIMPFLUG ANALYSER

M. Escaf , J. Mendoza, L. Izquierdo jr. , M. Henriquez Instituto de Ojos Oftalmo Salud Lima, Peru. EVALUATION OF CORNEAL PARAMETERS IN KERATOCONUS DIAGNOSTICS USING A SCHEIMPFLUG ANALYSER. There is no financial interest in this poster. PURPOSE.

roland
Download Presentation

EVALUATION OF CORNEAL PARAMETERS IN KERATOCONUS DIAGNOSTICS USING A SCHEIMPFLUG ANALYSER

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. M. Escaf, J. Mendoza, L. Izquierdojr., M. Henriquez Instituto de Ojos OftalmoSalud Lima, Peru EVALUATION OF CORNEAL PARAMETERS IN KERATOCONUS DIAGNOSTICS USING A SCHEIMPFLUG ANALYSER There is no financial interest in this poster

  2. PURPOSE • To evaluate corneal parameters in keratoconic eyes using PentacamScheimpflug analyzer.

  3. MATERIALS AND METHODS • Case-control study in 100 eyes • 66 normal eyes • 34 keratoconic eyes • Keratoconus diagnosis made using Scheimpflug analyzer (Pentacam) • Evaluation of • Corneal pachymetry in the central and thinnest point • vertex position • asphericity • Central, 4mm superior and inferior dioptricalpower • Anterior and posterior elevation Central, 4mm superior and inferior • Statistical evaluation done with SPSS 15

  4. RESULTS

  5. RESULTS

  6. RESULTS

  7. RESULTS

  8. RESULTS

  9. RESULTS

  10. CONCLUSIONS • There is a high difference on each of the corneal parameter evaluated with Pentacam between normal and keratoconiceyes. • With a significant difference on the elevation maps both anterior and posterior. • Corneal vertex dispersion was significantly higher in keratoconic eyes.

More Related