130 likes | 202 Views
This study compares data from dialectlexicography and first language acquisition to explore the vulnerability to variation of acquired lexical items. Topics include lexical diversity, acquisition, and tools for analysis. The research investigates the origin and diversification of language through examples from German, Dutch, English, Frisian, and Swedish. Various lexical items are analyzed to understand acquisition patterns and frequency of production. Tools like COAVA are utilized for dialectlexicography and CHILDES for measuring lexical variation.
E N D
Is what we have acquired early, less vulnerable to variation? A comparison between data from dialectlexicography and data from first language acquisition ICDG Vienna 2012
Cognition, Acquisition and Variation Tool (CLARIN) Leonie Cornips – Maastricht University Jos Swanenberg – Tilburg University Folkert de Vriend – MeertensInstitute Wilbert Heeringa – Groningen University The Netherlands
Topics & approach • The diversity of lexicalvariation • The acquisition of lexical items • Corpus-basedapproach -> Tools
The origin and diversification of language (Swadesh 1971: 283) • German Dutch English Frisian Swedish • Sonne zon sunsinne sol • Wein wijn winewyn vin • Nase neus nose noas näsa • Fischvis fish fiskfisk • Vatervader father heit fader • Rose roos rose roasros • rot rood red read röd
LexicalVariation (WBD) • CONCEPT GUIRAUD SEM. Relation • ‘bird’ vogel0.44 hyperonym • ‘blackbird’ merel0.64 hyponym • ‘owl’uil0.7 hyponym • ‘sparrow’mus2.16 hyponym • ‘titmouse’ mees4.01 hyponym
Acquisition (CHILDES) • LEXICAL ITEM DAY#1 FREQ. • ‘bird’ vogel 641 81 • ‘owl’uil680 11 • ‘blackbird’ merel909 5 • ‘sparrow’mus821 4 • ‘titmouse’ mees869 1
COAVA Tool • Dialectlexicography: • Measures of lexicalvariation • Maps of lexicalvariation • CHILDES: • Time and • Frequency of production
Type Token Ratio A AA < A B C A AA D E F A AA G H I Heterogeneity (SID) A B C < A A B B C A A B B C A B C CC
Entropy A A B < A AA A B B A A B C CC A B C VAR = TTR * SID * ETP