1 / 30

Clinical Excellence Awards

ACCEA. ADVISORY COMMITTEE on. CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS. Clinical Excellence Awards. October 2008 Jonathan Montgomery Chairman ACCEA. ACCEA. ADVISORY COMMITTEE on. CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS. Objective.

rosaline
Download Presentation

Clinical Excellence Awards

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS Clinical Excellence Awards October 2008 Jonathan Montgomery Chairman ACCEA

  2. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS Objective • To reward consultants who show the greatest sustained levels of performance and commitment to the NHS

  3. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS In a way that is • Transparent, fair, based on clear evidence and perceived to be so • Open and accessible to all eligible consultants • Fair in its distribution of awards

  4. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS 2009 – 5 Guides • Applicants; eligibility, how to apply • Assessors; scoring, details on criteria • Employers; committees & annual reports • Nominators; ranking processes, citations • Award holders; reviews, changes of circumstance

  5. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS Eligibility • At least one year’s experience at consultant level, medical or dental qualification, fully registered, employed in NHS or DH bodies • Pre-conditions • Participation in appraisal • Fulfilling job plan • Compliance with Private Practice Code • Working to GMC/GDC standards of conduct

  6. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS Criteria for Excellence • Performance over and above standard expected of a consultant in their post • Sustained commitment to patient care, public health • High standards • Commitment to values and goals of the NHS

  7. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS The Pyramid

  8. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS A Competitive Scheme • 2,243 national applications for 576 new awards • All applications considered by regional sub-committees • Some also by national nominating bodies, e.g. Royal College of Surgeons • ‘Shortlisted’ applications from either route considered by Chair and Medical Director

  9. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS

  10. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS Decision-making for national levels

  11. Distribution of CEAs at June 2007

  12. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS

  13. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS Application • Candidate complete the application form. • Submitted electronically on web-based form by 1700 on 19 12 08 • Standardised presentation of case • Personal statement, job plan, five domains • Employer citation and confirmation of eligibility

  14. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS 2006

  15. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS Age of Awardees 2005

  16. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS Nomination • Indication of relative esteem – ranked lists • Sub-Committees & National Nominating Bodies • Ensure consideration by Medical Director & Chair • Specialist Societies • Consideration by sub-committees • The process for nomination must comply with ACCEA requirements • Must provide citations on request even if do not rank

  17. Comparison of success rates 2006

  18. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS Citation • Comment on quality of achievements • Should relate to achievement within the competence of the nominating body • Should not be provided by a colleague from the same institution • Should be submitted by the President or Chairman of the nominating body

  19. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS Evidence • Standard application form complete by consultant • Personal statement, job plan summary + 5 domains • delivering high quality service, • developing high quality service, • managing a high quality service, • research, • teaching and training • Employer (mandatory) and third party (voluntary) citations • Nominations (ranked lists)

  20. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS The Form Personal statement. • Should highlight the key achievements presented in detail in the rest of the application form • Will be published if you are successful

  21. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS The Form JOB PLAN • Summarises the candidates job • Excellence does not require additional activity before it can be judged to be ‘over and above’ expectations • But excellence may be judged differently for contributions that that are a major part of the job receiving dedicated support

  22. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS No one gets a national award unless their application has impressed a peers, employers and lay people BUT • deserving people may not apply • application forms may not do the applicants justice

  23. ACCEA ADVISORY COMMITTEE on CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS Evidence Needed • Evaluation of applications not people • Quality indications needed, not posts held • Over and above expectations • Sustained improvement needed for progression

More Related