210 likes | 316 Views
SmartReflex Power and Performance Management Technologies for 90 nm, 65 nm, and 45 nm Mobile Application Processors. FaridehShiran Department of Electronics Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada fshiran@doe.carleton.ca. Outline. Introduction First Generation 90 nm
E N D
SmartReflex Power and Performance Management Technologies for 90 nm, 65 nm, and 45 nm Mobile Application Processors FaridehShiran Department of Electronics Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada fshiran@doe.carleton.ca
Outline • Introduction • First Generation 90 nm • Second Generation 65 nm • Third Generation 45 nm • Design Methodology and Automation • Low Power Standard: IEEE-1801 • Conclusion
Outline • Introduction • First Generation 90 nm • Second Generation 65 nm • Third Generation 45 nm • Design Methodology and Automation • Low Power Standard: IEEE-1801 • Conclusion
Introduction • Demand for increasing features of handheld devices • Processors speeds reaching 1 GHz and above • Bottleneck: battery technology • Trade-off: battery life versus higher speeds • Technology Scaling • Advantages • Disadvantagrs
Demand for Increased Mobile Product Features and Performance
Leakage Power in different technologies • Extend battery life • Co-optimization: Process and circuit • Texas Instruments (TI) for 90 nm, 65 nm, 45 nm • SmartReflex
Outline • Introduction • First Generation 90 nm • Second Generation 65 nm • Third Generation 45 nm • Design Methodology and Automation • Low Power Standard: IEEE-1801 • Conclusion
90 nm Leakage Power Management • Exponential increase in leakage : • Power gating • uses high Vt sleep transistors which cut off VDD from a circuit block • SRAM retention • Losing data stored in SRAM, retention needed • Multiple channel length • Reducing leakage power both in active and idle modes • OMAP2 Mobile Application Process • Integrate above techniques in a 90 nm technology
Power gating Global/local power grid methodology
Outline • Introduction • First Generation 90 nm • Second Generation 65 nm • Third Generation 45 nm • Design Methodology and Automation • Low Power Standard: IEEE-1801 • Conclusion
65nm Power and Performance • Larger increase in device leakage • Improving SmartReflex power management toolbox: • Leakage power management • aggressive dynamic voltage frequency scaling • Process and temperature adaptive voltage scaling 65 nm technology OMAP3430 application processor
Outline • Introduction • First Generation 90 nm • Second Generation 65 nm • Third Generation 45 nm • Design Methodology and Automation • Low Power Standard: IEEE-1801 • Conclusion
45 nm Power and Performance • Further reduction of active leakage power and performance increase • Adaptive body bias (ABB): • FBB • RBB • Retention Til Access (RTA) • Full power state • Low power state • Single Chip 3.5 Baseband and Applications Processor • Integrate above techniques in a 45 nm technology
Outline • Introduction • First Generation 90 nm • Second Generation 65 nm • Third Generation 45 nm • Design Methodology and Automation • Low Power Standard: IEEE-1801 • Conclusion
Design methodology and automation • SmartReflex-PriMer (SmartPriMer): • Chip-level leakage management design methodology • Power Managed (PM) modules • Power-Aware Verification • PM integrity check • Power-aware simulations at RTL and gate levels • Not power-aware • Power-aware
Outline • Introduction • First Generation 90 nm • Second Generation 65 nm • Third Generation 45 nm • Design Methodology and Automation • Low Power Standard: IEEE-1801 • Conclusion and Future Work
Low Power Standard: IEEE-1801 • Unified Power Format (UPF): • Why UPF? • PM intent information • UPF1.0: power design intent in verification and implementation • Power states • Power domain specifications • Retention, Isolation and level shifting • UPF2.0-IEEE1801 • Command layering • Supply set handles
Conclusions • For higher performance (power management) • Three generation technologies • 90nm, 65nm, 40nm • design methodology • SmartReflex-PriMer • Power-Aware Verification • Standard • UPF 1.0 • UPF 2.0