1 / 38

Sepsis: Evidence Based Controversies

Sepsis: Evidence Based Controversies. Rachel Hinerman, MD FCCP. Definitions. Sepsis = suspected or proven infection and some of the following: General Variables Inflammatory Variables Hemodynamic Variables Organ Dysfunction Variables Tissue Perfusion Variables. Sepsis Variables. General.

roscoe
Download Presentation

Sepsis: Evidence Based Controversies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sepsis: Evidence Based Controversies Rachel Hinerman, MD FCCP

  2. Definitions • Sepsis = suspected or proven infection and some of the following: • General Variables • Inflammatory Variables • Hemodynamic Variables • Organ Dysfunction Variables • Tissue Perfusion Variables

  3. Sepsis Variables General Inflammatory • Fever • Hypothermia • Tachycardia • Altered Mental Status • Edema • Hyperglycemia • Leukocytosis • Leukopenia • Normal WBC with > 10 % immature forms • C-reactive protein > 2 SD • Procalcitonin > 2 SD

  4. Sepsis Variables Hemodynamic Organ Dysfunction • SBP <90 • MAP < 70 • SBP decrease > 40 Tissue Perfusion • Lactate > 1 • Mottling • Decreased Capillary Refill • P/F < 300 • UO < .5 ml/kg for 2 hours despite volume resuscitation • Cr increase > .5 • INR > 1.5 • Ileus • Plt < 100 K • Bili > 4

  5. Severe Sepsis Definition • Sepsis induced organ dysfunction, hypoperfusion, or hypotension • Hypotension • Elevated Lactic Acid • Oliguria • ALI with P/F < 250 without pneumonia • ALI with P/F < 200 with pneumonia • Cr > 2 • Bili > 2 • Plt < 100K • INR > 1.5

  6. Septic Shock • Sepsis-induced hypotension that persists despite adequate fluid resuscitation • *All definitions cited from “Surviving Sepsis Campaign” published in Critical Care Medicine Feb 2013

  7. Spectrum Of Severity Infection Sepsis Severe Sepsis Septic Shock Dellinger, RP. et al. Crit Care Med 2004;32

  8. Scope of The Problem

  9. A National Health Concern? • Myocardial Infarction • Incidence 900,000 • Deaths 225,000 • Mortality 25% • Cerebrovascular Accident • Incidence 700,000 • Deaths 163,5000 • Mortality 23% • Trauma • Incidence 2,900,000 • Deaths 42,643 • Mortality 1.5% • Severe Sepsis • Incidence 751,000 • Deaths 215,000 • Mortality 40-60% Angus, DC. et al Crit Care Med 2000;29 National Highway Traffic Safety Commission, 2003 AHA- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics, 2005 update

  10. Relative Mortality Deaths/Year Angus DC et al. Crit Care Med 2001; 29. American Cancer Society Karon et al. Am J Public Health 2001; 91. American Heart Assoc., 2001

  11. Determinants of Mortality • Source control is most vital factor • Adequate resuscitation or re-established perfusion in 6 hours • Appropriate antibiotic therapy within 1 hr of hypotension

  12. Improving Outcomes

  13. Interventions • Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT) • Anti-microbials • Steroids • Glucose Control • Lung Protective Ventilation

  14. % Absolute Risk Reduction Bernard et al. NEJM 2001; 344. Van den Berghe et al. NEJM 2001; 345.Rivers et al. NEJM 2001; 345 Annane et al. JAMA 2002; 288. ARDS-Net Investigators, NEJM; 2000

  15. EGDT Resuscitation • Begin at onset of hypotension or lactate >4 • Do not delay while awaiting ICU admission • Initial bolus is 30 ml/kg crystalloid Rivers E et al. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1368–1377

  16. EGDT • Initial Resuscitation targets • CVP 8-12 (12-15 if mechanically ventilated) • Mean arterial pressure ≥65 • Urine output ≥ 0.5 ml/kg/hour • Central venous oxygen saturation ≥ 65% • If venous oxygen target still not achieved: • trial of fluid or transfuse PRBCs to HCT ≥30% and/or start dobutamine infusion

  17. Rivers, NEJM 2001; 345:1368

  18. EGDT Outcomes Rivers, E et al. N Engl J Med 2001; 345

  19. EGDT Cost • 23% reduction in hospital cost • Most cost effective if patient volume > 16 cases/year • Mean reduction of 4 days per hospital admission • Cost per life saved of approximately $32,336 • Reduction in hospital charges from $135,000 to $82,000 Treciak S et al. Chest 2006;129:225-232 Huang DT, et al Crit Care 2003;7:S116 Shapiro N, et al. Crit Care Med 2006;34:1025-1032

  20. What to Use? • SAFE study: 28 day outcomes • RCT n=6997, 4% albumin or normal saline • Albumin group, 726 deaths - Saline group, 729 deaths • New organ failure was similar in the two groups • No difference: ICU or hospital LOS, mechanical ventilation days, or days of renal-replacement therapy • Guideline: colloid or crystalloid may be used Schierhout G et al. BMJ 1998; 316:961–964 Finfer S et al. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:2247–2256

  21. EGDT (and we mean EARLY) • Retrospective analysis of 212 patients • Diagnosis: septic shock and ALI within 72 hours • Adequate initial fluid resuscitation (AIFR) group • Administration of an initial fluid bolus of ≥ 20 mL/kg prior to and achievement of a central venous pressure of ≥ 8 mm Hg within 6 h after the onset of therapy with a vasopressor • Conservative late fluid management (CLFM) • Even-to-negative fluid balance measured on at least 2 consecutive days during the first 7 days after septic shock onset Murphy C V et al. Chest 2009;136:102-109

  22. Mean daily fluid balance days 1 through 7 NONSURVIVORS SURVIVORS Murphy C V et al. Chest 2009;136:102-109

  23. Hospital mortality for AIFR, CLFM, both, or neither 77% 57% 42% 18% Murphy CV et al. Chest 2009; 136:102-109

  24. EGDT & Intubation • No difference: P/F ratio at 6h; EGDT with higher P/F at 72h • No difference in intubation rates at 6 hours • 7-72 hour intubation rate: EGDT 2%vs. standard 16.8% Rivers, E et al. N Engl J Med 2001; 345 Otero R, et al. Chest 2006;130:1579-1595

  25. Vasopressors • Mean arterial pressure (MAP) maintained ≥ 65 • First choice: norepinephrine or epinephrine • Vasopressin 0.03 units/min may be added

  26. Vasopressin • VASST Trial • Hypothesis: VP will increase survival compared to NE at 28d • 779 patients in septic shock requiring vasopressors for ≥6 hours • Randomization to vasopressin or norepinephrine • No difference in 28-day survival (35.4% v 39.3%, P =.27). • When groups were stratified by severity of hypotension • Low-dose NE improved survival with VP 26% v 35%, P .05 • Result persisted at 90 days: mortality of 36% vs. 46 %, P =.04 Russell J et al. NEJM2008;358,9.

  27. Inotropes • Dobutamine infusion for suspected myocardial dysfunction suggested by elevated cardiac filling pressures and low cardiac output • Recommend against a strategy to increase cardiac index to supranormal levels Gattinoni L, et al. New Engl J Med 1995; 333:1025-32 Hayes MA, et al. New Engl J Med 1994; 330:1717-22

  28. Interventions • Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT) • Anti-microbials • Steroids • Glucose Control

  29. Antimicrobials • Begin therapy within the first hour of recognizing severe sepsis or septic shock • Broad spectrum: one or more agents against likely bacterial or fungal pathogens • Consider combination therapy for potentially resistant gram negative pathogens • Consider combination therapy in neutropenic patients • Narrow coverage when culture data available Garnacho-Montero J et al. CCM2007;25:1888-1895

  30. Antimicrobials • Study objective: to determine the impact of initial antimicrobial therapy on survival in patients with septic shock • Data: 5,715 cases between 1996 and 2005 • Community-acquired = 55%; nosocomial origin = 45% • Appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy = 80% • Overall rate of survival to hospital discharge = 43% • The survival rates: • Appropriate initial therapy 52% • Inappropriate initial therapy 10% Kumar A et al. Chest 2009;136:1237-1248

  31. Interventions • Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT) • Anti-microbials • Steroids • Glucose Control

  32. 2012 Steroid Guidelines • The ACTH stimulation test should not be used to identify the subset of adults with septic shock who should receive hydrocortisone. • Do not use corticosteroids in the treatment of sepsis in the absence of shock. • Corticosteroid therapy may be weaned when vasopressors are no longer required. • Recommended: hydrocortisone 50 mg iv q 6 hours Dellinger RP, et al Crit Care Med 2008;36:296-327

  33. Interventions • Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT) • Anti-microbials • Steroids • Glucose Control

  34. Glucose Controversy • Leuven protocol: 80-110 • Cardiac-surgicalICU • Reduced ICU LOS • Less organ dysfunction • Hypoglycemia 6.2% • Decreased Mortality • 3.4% ARR all patients • 9.4% ARR LOS >5 days • Leuven protocol: 80-110 • MedicalICU • Reduced ICU LOS • Less ventilator days • Less acute renal injury • Hypoglycemia 18% • Mortality difference • Overall: no difference • LOS > 3 days: ↓ mortality Van den Berghe G, et al. NEJM 2006; 354:449-461 Van den Berghe G, et al. NEJM 2001;345:1359-1367

  35. NICE-SUGAR • RCT open-label comparing intensive BS 80-110 vs.. conventional BS <180 • 6,104 ICU heterogeneous patients • Primary end point: 90-day mortality • Secondary end points: • Hypoglycemia • Infection • Need for organ support • Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay The NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators NEJM 2008; Volume 360:1283-1297

  36. 2012 Glucose Control Guidelines • Patients with severe sepsis and hyperglycemia in the ICU should receive intravenous insulin. • Use validated protocol for insulin dose adjustment with a target glucose <180. • All patients on intravenous insulin receive a glucose calorie source. Dellinger RP, et al Crit Care Med 2008;36:296-327

  37. Resuscitation “Bundles” • Severe Sepsis 3 Hour Bundle • Recognition • Fluid Resuscitation • Antimicrobial Therapy • Oxygen Delivery • Severe Sepsis 6 Hour Bundle • Low-dose Steroids • Glucose Control • Lung Protective Ventilation

  38. NYS Sepsis Initiative • Hospitals shall have in place evidence-based protocols for the early recognition and treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. • Hospitals shall have a process for screening all adult and pediatric patients for sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock in the ED and hospital. • Quality measures will be collected and reported.

More Related