1 / 21

Participation of the Slovak Universities on the 7 FP

by Prof. Daniel Kluvanec Constantine Philosopher University in Nitra. Participation of the Slovak Universities on the 7 FP. Bratislava 6/12/2005. Participation in 6FP projects - irreplaceable experience for universities.

rose-dudley
Download Presentation

Participation of the Slovak Universities on the 7 FP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. by Prof. Daniel Kluvanec Constantine Philosopher University in Nitra Participation of the Slovak Universities on the 7 FP Bratislava 6/12/2005

  2. Participation in 6FP projects - irreplaceable experience for universities. • SARC – Centre for development, science and technologies plays an important role in forming of programmes and giving information through publishing "Bulletin for international scientific and technological cooperation, and technologies transfer." - SARC – INFO.

  3. A. State of the art, cornerstones The successfulness of Slovak institutions in obtaining grants through projects within 6FP was comparable with successfulness of other V4 countries, but in comparison with EU 15 countries significantly lower. The percentage of unsuccessful projects is low, i.e. most submitted projects were successful. In comparison with 5 FP, the number of submitted projects increased by 35 %, from 552 to 745 projects. 137 were approved, that is successfulness of 18 % in 6 FP in comparison with 27 % (149 projects) in 5 FP.

  4. Fruitfulness some country EU on approve a projects 6 FP. The number of the approve projects.

  5. Contracted EC contribution per one researcher

  6. Participations of EU-25 in successful FP6 projects(per 1. mil. population – July 2005)

  7. The ratio “€contracted in FP6/ € GERD”

  8. The number of the requests of thecoordination and approve a projects

  9. Comparison participation industry and research

  10. The number of the approve projects on particular branch.

  11. The number of the submitted and the number of the approved projects 7FP from Slovak Institutions

  12. Finance that are Slovakia insert in 6FP and that can obtain.

  13. Distribution finance receives in 6RPin the Slovakia by various branch

  14. Slovakia Latvia Malta Italy Czech Republic Poland France US Estonia Spain EU-25 (1) EU-15 (2) Hungary UK Germany Belgium Sweden Austria Netherlands Slovenia Cyprus Finland Denmark Ireland Greece Portugal Luxembourg Japan Lithuania 0 5 10 15 20 25 Share of BERD financed by government(latest available year)

  15. Germany 53363 France 34527 United Kingdom 31117 13572 Italy Sweden 10459 Netherlands 8090 7606 Ford Motor Spain 7194 DaimlerChrysler 6293 Siemens 6032 General Motors 5729 5515 Belgium Pfizer, USA 5113 Toyota Motor 4905 Finland 4830 Austria 4788 IBM 4685 4669 GlaxoSmithKline Denmark 4617 Matsushita Elec 4587 4531 Volkswagen Ireland 1315 Portugal 1203 Poland 1188 Czech Republic 959 Greece 852 Hungary 706 Luxembourg 364 Slovenia 360 Slovak Republic 148 Lithuania 100 56 Estonia Latvia 42 Cyprus 34 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 Total R&D expenditure of the 25 Member States compared withthe top 10 R&D spending multinationals (2002, € billion)

  16. Characteristics of activities in preparing projects and their success within 6FP: - use of good practice from 5FP, - wider awareness and reforms leading to broader activities at universities, - initiative of NCP (National Contact Point) and SIKAS (Slovak information and counselling academic network),

  17. - lower successfulness of Slovakia (lower financial amount obtained), - unfavourable composition of instruments: 50 % of supporting projects, 10% of coordination actions, - the most approved projects were submitted by universities (52), SAS (37), though the biggest financial amount was gained by SAS, (36.4 %), less by universities (28.7 %), - investment and profit 18 mil eur/ 10.6 mil eur.

  18. B. How to increase successfulness of Slovak universities in 6FP projects? - higher preference of science and education in national level, - support the development of sophisticated infrastructure for science and research, - focus on the quality of programmes,

  19. - deeper cooperation in Central European area, regional and national collaboration, e.g. with Austria, which is verysuccessful in FPs, cooperation between universities and the Slovak Academy of Sciences, - advice from NCP and SIKAS, - focus on research projects, - attempt to increase coordination of projects.

  20. Average country contribution (share in %) to the project budget

  21. Average country share (%) of the EC project contribution

More Related