and implemented by the Consortium: Louis Berger SAS, KLC Law Firm, SYSTRA SA

1. PROJECT: “Integration of Trans-European Transport Network and Border Crossing Points” Belarus - Ukraine Transport Policy EC and Republic of BELARUS ROUND TABLE Minsk 04/02/2010 This project is funded by the European Union and implemented by the Consortium: Louis Berger SAS, KLC Law Firm, SYSTRA SA

2. Overall objectives: • to contribute to the development and adoption of a comprehensive strategy linking-up actual and future transit needs, transport and border crossing capacities; • to prepare the pre feasibility studies for the identified priority projects; • to serve as a practical tool on which sustainable transport cooperation between the beneficiary countries and between them and the EU can be based on in future.

3. Specific objectives : Reviewing the situation at borders (road and rail) including in-depth statistical analysis of trade and traffic data; Assessments for defining and prioritising the investments/projects; Proposing methodology to adjust border crossing needs to both expected traffic flows and expected transport capacity; Conducting the required pre-and feasibility studies andpreparation of the terms of reference for other projects/feasibility studies financed by the EU or IFI’s; Preparing preliminary proposals on financing possibilities, involving relevant IFIs and banks and identification of relevant infrastructure funding mechanisms; Designing tools for the national authorities for monitoring and adjusting the relevant strategies/master plans.

4. Expected Results: R1 - A Study on the situation at the relevant borders encompassing the road and rail modes of transport is carried out; R2 - A set of scenarios on the potential trade and people flows for relevant border crossing points are prepared; R3 - Review on border control procedures, following the new status of partner states as EU neighbours is done; a set of recommendations and relevant legal instruments on their improvement is prepared; R4 - At least two (pre) feasibility studies are conducted; R5 - The tools in order to allow national authorities to monitor and adjust the list of measures and priorities are designed.

5. Project Milestones and Timetable: • Findings of Inception period April 2009 • Recommendations for extensions to TEN-T June 2009 • Study on Current Situation July 2009 • Methodology to adjust BC /access needs July 2009 • Conceptual Border Crossing Master Plan October 2009 • Traffic Forecast December 2009 • Tools for master plan monitoring December 2009 • At least 2 (Pre) Feasibility Studies November 2010 • Training sessions & Study Tour 2010

6. Geographical Area and Target Groups: Geographical area to be covered: The Project will cover Ukraine and Belarus, in particular border areas and border crossing points on the IX Corridor (TEN-T). Target groups: The Ministries of Transport and Communications of Ukraine and Belarus. In project implementations shall also be involved other stakeholders from the public and private sectors, such as Customs Services of the countries concerned, related other ministries and services, freight forwarders and their associations, civil society representatives, academics and research groups.

7. Transport overview in ENP countries and Russia - 2006 Source: Eurostat. ENP: European Neighborhood Policy Partner Countries.

8. Foreign trade of the Republic of Belarus with CIS countries in 2007 (mln. USD) Sources:Belstat

9. Commodity structure of exports and imports in 2007 (per cent of total) Import Export Sources:Belstat

10. Corridor IX

11. Freight Flow scenario between E 29 and EU Neighbouring Countries for 2020 (mln. tons) 11

12. Railway Transit flows in Belarus in 2006 Sources: Ministry of Transport Belarus 12

14. Pan-European Corridor IX crossing Russia, Lithuania, Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine in comparison with other corridors, has a particular potential for economic development of the region. In many regional economic studies, places along corridor IX, such as Kaliningrad, St. Petersburg, Moscow in Russia, Klaipeda, Kaunas, Vilnius in Lithuania, Minsk, Mohiliv, Gomel, Vitebsk in Belarus and Kiev and Chernigov in Ukraine, are described as potential key-areas for efficient economic development due to high density of population and industrial activities.

15. Norway Transport CorridorI Transport Corridor I A Transport CorridorIX Transport Corridor IX D Italy Transport Corridor IX, IXB, IXD, I and IA 7 FINLAND StPetersburg HELSINKI $ $ SWEDEN TALLINN $ $ STOCKHOLM ESTONIA I MOSCOW LATVIA RIGA RUSSIA E Sauliai LITHUANIA E Klaipeda Sovetsk IX E Kaunas BELORUSSIA E KALININGRAD VILNIUS MINSK IXD Gdansk I А VI POLAND UKRAINE WARSAW To Kiev

16. A well functioning transport system connecting the European Union (EU) and the neighbouring countries is essential for sustainable economic growth and the wellbeing of all citizens in this part of the world Report from the High Level Group* chaired by Loyola de Palacio. November 2005 Extension of the major trans-European transport axes to the neighbouring countries and regions * High Level Group comprised 26 Neibhbouring Countries (including Belarus and Ukraine), the 25 EU States plus Bulgaria and Romania, EIB, EBRD and WB

17. The five transnational transport axes proposed by the High Level Group of EC are the result of a major strategic reflection on the transport priorities for the EU and its neighborhood, including Ukraine and Belarus/Eastern Partnership. For the future development of transport sector of Ukraine and Belarus gradual and efficient integration to the TEN-T, especially Central and South/TRACECA axes are very significant for Eastern Partnership countries due to its geographical alignment.

18. Fivemajortransnationalaxes: • Motorways of the Seas: linking the Baltic, Barents, Atlantic, Mediterranean, Black and the Caspian Sea areas as well as the littoral countries within the sea areas and with an extension through the Suez Canal towards the Red Sea. • Northern axis: to connect the northern EU with Norway to the North and with Belarus and Russia and beyond to the East. A connection to the Barents region linking Norway through Sweden and Finland with Russia is also foreseen. • Central axis: to link the centre of the EU to Ukraine and the Black Sea and through an inland waterway connection to the Caspian Sea. Connections towards Central Asia and the Caucasus are also foreseen, as well as a direct connection to the Trans-Siberian railway and a link from the Don/Volga inland waterway to the Baltic Sea. • South Eastern axis: to link the EU through the Balkans and Turkey to the Caucasus and the Caspian Sea as well as to Egypt and the Red Sea. Access links to the Balkan countries as well as connections towards Russia, Iran and Iraq and the Persian Gulf are also foreseen. • - South Western axis: to connect the south-western EU with Switzerland and Morocco and beyond, including the trans-Maghrebin link connecting Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia. An extension of the trans-Maghrebin link to Egypt as well as a connection from Egypt to the South towards other African countries are also foreseen. 18

19. Fivemajortransnationalaxes:

20. The list of priority projects as identified by the Group: Belarus Rail: 1. Railway line section Brest – Osinovka. 2. Railway line Lithuanian border –Minsk – Gomel – Ukraine border. Road: 1. Road connection Brest-Minsk-Russia border. 2. Road connection Lithuanian border-Minsk-Gomel-Ukraine border. Ukraine Rail: 1. Construction of railway tunnel on section Beskyd-Skotarske. 2. Creation and development of logistic centers as well as infrastructure in Chop. Road: 1. Upgrading of sections Kiev-Zhashkiv and Chervonoznamenka-Odessa on the road Kiev-Odessa. 2. Upgrading of road Lviv-Krakovets (Poland border). Out of the eight (8) listed projects two (2) projects are part and covered by Pan European Corridor IX and have direct relation with ToR of our project: - Railway line Lithuanian border –Minsk – Gomel – Ukraine border; - Road connection Lithuanian border-Minsk-Gomel-Ukraine border;

21. Preliminary Finding of Technical condition of the road Chernigiv-Gomel-Bobruysk: • During the site visit in Chernihiv and Gomel regions: • technical condition of highway M01/E95/271 (150 km) and 10 bridges of the Road Corridor IX from Chernihiv towards to border crossing point “NovyieYarilovichi” and Repki – Senkovka, and • (b) from Bobruisk towards to border crossing point “Novaya Guta” 150 km and 11 bridges were inspected. Majority of the bridges were constructed in 1955-1962 and 1973-1974 and do not correspond with Technical Category I of highway standards, which, due to traffic safety reasons, highlights the urgent need for modernization/rehabilitation works.

22. Preliminary Finding of Technical condition of the road Chernigiv-Gomel-Bobruysk – Cont’d: - Width of majority of bridges is 6,0 m, which is not in compliance with references of Category I Highway, hence the roads are narrowing before and after the bridge. - Waterproofing is not corresponding with standards. - Majority of bridges have limitation of weight per axel 9,5-10.5 t. N.B. According the SNIP/GOST Standards, after 50 years of operation all bridges have to be demolished or fully reconstructed, due to the aging of metal and concrete constructions.

23. Proposed set of Pre Feasibility studies for road section of Road Corridor IX: IV II III I

24. Set of Pre Feasibility studies for road section of Road Transport Corridor IX for identification: I. Pre Feasibility studies for upgrading of Road Section Bobruysk - Kipti II. Pre Feasibility studies for upgrading of Road Section Bobruysk - Chernigiv: III. Pre Feasibility studies for upgrading of Road SectionGomel - Chernigiv: IV. Pre Feasibility studies for upgrading of Road Section Gomel – Nova Guta:

25. Main Conclusions of RWG, 27.01.10, Kiev: 1. Pre-feasibility study should cover all sections of highway (over 350 km) from Bobruysk (Belarus) till Kipti (Ukraine) for the purpose of the road section modernization of the transport corridor IX to the 1st technical category. 2. Preparation of tender documentation for rehabilitation Minsk – Gomel highway section km 57,400 – 131,500.

26. WG on Rail The first meeting of the working group on rail took place in Kiev on the 28th January 2010; The working groups conclusions are the following: • Full electrification of the railway road from Odessa to Belarus was identified as the main interesting project in term of border crossing improvement for BCP n°2 and 3 (part of corridor n°IX) as far as Gomel. Current stage of development in Belarus seems to be more advanced than in Ukraine. • To identify and if possible to invite next month specialised experts already involved in electrification projects to be part of the working group team in order to launch a pre feasibility study; • Weak Vicking train performances in Ukraine is more due to tariff regulations and customs aspects than lack of infrastructures, even if the electrification problem exits also when approaching the border with Belarus.

27. Customs WG The first meeting of the Working Group on Customs was organized in Kiev on 23 December 2009. Main outcomes of the meeting was: • basic bottlenecks of practical application of the PAIES system have been described and analyzed between the current PAIES system operating between Ukraine and Moldova; • Belarus customs authorities took into account the fact of negative influence of non-unified approaches of preliminary data record and a decision reached on consideration of introduction of general classifications in subsequent work with PAIES; • the representatives of custom authorities of Republic of Belarus and Ukraine expressed the interest in preliminary data exchange organization on commodities and transport vehicles which move through the state border of Ukraine and Republic of Belarus.

28. Thank You for attention