1 / 14

Critical Thinking

Critical Thinking. Dr. John Eigenauer Taft College. Why teach critical thinking?. Strong correlation between trained critical thinking skills and GPA. Critical thinking improves with correct training. Strong correlation between trained critical thinking and reading skills.

rosina
Download Presentation

Critical Thinking

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Critical Thinking Dr. John Eigenauer Taft College

  2. Why teach critical thinking? • Strong correlation between trained critical thinking skills and GPA. • Critical thinking improves with correct training. • Strong correlation between trained critical thinking and reading skills. • One critical thinking course is roughly equivalent to four years of undergraduate education.

  3. CT improves with training.

  4. Research on the State of Student CT Abilities • “Unfortunately, the results of any number of national and international studies indicate that few high school graduates (or entering college students) are able to apply higher-order thinking skills to problems faced in everyday life (see e.g. NSF, 1996). Controlled studies in psychology and education confirm this finding. They indicate that most students have difficulty in (a) identifying and defining problems from multiple perspectives; (b) detecting gaps in knowledge and information; (c) establishing cause-effect relationships; (d) distinguishing facts from opinions or personal values; (e) accepting unfavorable information; and (f) evaluating costs and benefits of risky decisions. In an exhaustive study evaluating the thinking of students in high school, college, and graduate school and comparison groups of nonstudents, Perkins (1985) has reached similar conclusions. Post-primary education appears to have little impact on students' reasoning about everyday events, and number of years of education is only a borderline significant predictor of reasoning ability.” (Current Issues in Education: http://cie.asu.edu/volume2/number5/)

  5. What is the state of critical thinking in colleges? • 89% of college instructors said that critical thinking was “a primary object of their instruction”. • 19% “could give a clear explanation of what critical thinking is.” • 8% “could enumerate ANY intellectual criteria or standards they required of students or could give an intelligible explanation of what those criteria and standards were.”

  6. Summary • People do not learn to think critically without targeted instruction. • There are strong reasons to teach Critical Thinking. • College and university instructors generally do not know what CT is. • College and university instructors generally do not know how to do so.

  7. The Parts of Critical Thinking • Interpretation: To correctly extract the intended and essential meaning from information. • Analysis: To assess the parts and relationships of communication. • Evaluation: To use intellectual standards to judge the truth, credibility, or logical strength of a statement. • Inference: To draw reasonable meaning, conclusions, or consequences from information, knowledge, or evidence. • Explanation: To “attempt to show why or how something happens” (Hughes, p. 94). • Self-regulation: The process of consciously scrutinizing and evaluating one’s own thought processes using objective standards.

  8. How should Critical Thinking be taught? By Doing What WORKS

  9. What Works?

  10. What Works?

  11. What Works?

  12. “I’ve been skeptical about claims for various approaches to critical thinking, including those for argument maps coming from the University of Melbourne. Indeed, confident in our skepticism, we at Monash Philosophy accepted a challenge to compare our methods with theirs on pre- and post-test gains on the California Critical Thinking Skills Test developed by Peter Facione (1990, 1992). The Monash students did a bit better than theirs on the pre-test, raising our hopes. But when Melbourne University’s post-test results showed far higher performance gains, I thought their method worth a closer look.” Charles Twardy, Monash University Published in Teaching Philosophy

  13. What is to be done? Dr. Tim van Gelder • Practice. Practice should be deliberate, exercise-focused. • Guidance. Students need to know what to do next. • Scaffolding. Structures in place to avoid inappropriate or ineffective activity (software). • Graduatedtasks. A graduated increase in complexity. • Feedback. Student should be able to tell whether an activity is successful.

  14. This presentation and more information about Critical Thinking can be found at: http://www.eigenauer.com/criticalthinking Phone: 661.763.7722 Email: jeigenauer@yahoo.com Dr. John Eigenauer

More Related