1 / 15

Magnetospheric protection of ``Hot Jupiters'': The key role of magnetodisks in scaling

Magnetospheric protection of ``Hot Jupiters'': The key role of magnetodisks in scaling of a planetary magnetospheric obstacle. M. L. Khodachenko 1 , I. I. Alexeev 2 , E. Belenkaya 2 , H. Lammer 1 (1) Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, Austria,

rosine
Download Presentation

Magnetospheric protection of ``Hot Jupiters'': The key role of magnetodisks in scaling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Magnetospheric protection of ``Hot Jupiters'': The key role of magnetodisks in scaling of a planetary magnetospheric obstacle M. L. Khodachenko 1, I. I. Alexeev 2, E. Belenkaya 2, H. Lammer 1 (1) Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, Austria, (2) Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia,

  2. Exoplanet – Status Jun. 2011 usual Giants Hot Jupiters >0.2 MJ < 0.3 AU 165 (29%) • • Solar system planets • • • ? Evolution of planets ? Formation of terrestrial type worlds • 33 planets, <10 mEarth • 11 planets, < 5 mEarth • 465 Exoplanetary systems • 556 Exoplanets • 57 Multiple Planetary systems Super-Earths ?

  3. Exoplanet evolution – mass loss EXOBASE ●Stellar X-ray and EUV induced expansion of the upper atmospheres Stellar XUV luminosity energy deposition to upper atmospheres

  4. Exoplanet evolution – mass loss Magnetically protected planet Early Earth present Earth present Venus, Mars, or Titan Magnetically non-protected planet ●Soft X-ray and EUV induced expansion of the upper atmospheres high thermal & non-thermal loss rates The size of magneto- sphere is a crucial parameter Thermal escape: particle energy > WESC  Jeans escape–particles from “tails”  hydrodynamic escape – all particles Non-thermal escape:  Ion pick-up  Sputtering (S.W. protons & ions)  Photo-chemical energizing & escape  Electromagnetic ion acceleration

  5. Exoplanet magnetic fields – role in planet protection Busse, F. H., Phys. Earth Planet. Int.,12, 350, 1976 Interval of possible values for planetary magnetic dipole: Mmax … Mmin J.-M. Grießmeier, A&A, 2004, 425, 753 J.-M. Grießmeier,Astrobiology, 2005,5 Stevenson, D.J., Rep. Prog. Phys., 46, 555, 1983  Mizutani, H., et al., Adv. Space Res., 12, 265, 1992 Mizutani, H., et al., Adv. Space Res., 12, 265, 1992 Sano, Y., J. Geomag. Geoelectr, 45, 65, 1993 ●Magnetic moment estimation from scaling laws  range for possible M rc - radius of the dynamo region (“core radius”): rc ~ MP0.75 RP-0.96 c - density in the dynamo region - conductivity in the dynamo region  - planet angular rotation velocity

  6. Exoplanet magnetic fields – role in planet protection ●Magnetic moment estimation from scaling laws  range for possible M  Limitation of Mby tidal locking [Grießmeier, J.-M., et al., Astrobiology, 5(5), 587, 2005] Tidal locking strongly reduced magnetic moments HD 209458b : M = (0.005 … 0.10) MJup

  7. Exoplanet magnetic fields – role in planet protection ●Non-thermal mass loss of a Hot Jupiter with a dipole type magnetosphere (a problem of protection against of strong atm. erosion) Khodachenko et al., PSS, 55, 631, 2007; Khodachenko et al., Astrobiology, 7, 167, 2007 CME induced H+ ion pick-up loss at 0.05 AU for ‘Hot Jupiters’  HD209458 b Mass loss ~1011 g/s even for weak CMEs & Mmax strong magn. protection in reality

  8. Exoplanet magnetospheres – importance of magnetodisk J.-M. Grießmeier, A&A, 2004, 425, 753 Relatively large amount of observed Hot Jupiters (29%): ”survival” of close-in giants indicates their efficient protection against of extreme plasma and radiation conditions All estimations were based on too simplified model Magnetospheric protection of exoplanets was studied assuming a simple planetary dipole dominated magnetosphere  dipole mag. field B = Bdip ~ M / r3 balances stellar wind ram pressure  big M are needed for the efficient protection (but tidal locking  small M  small Rs) Specifics of close-in exoplanets  new model  strong mass lossof a planet should lead to formation of a plasma disk (similar to Jupiter and Saturn)  Magnetodisk dominated magnitosphere  more complete planetary magnetosphere model, including the whole complex of the magnetospheric electric current systems

  9. Exoplanet magnetospheres – importance of magnetodisk • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ●Paraboloid Magnetospheirc Model (PMM) for ‘Hot Jupiters’ Semi-analytical model. Key assumption: magnetopause is approximated by paraboloid of revolution along planet-star (VSW) line PMM considers mag. field of different currentsystems on the boundaries and within the boundaries of a planetary magnetopause:  planetary magnetic dipole;  current system of magnetotail;  magnetodisk;  magnetopause currents;  magnetic field of stellar wind, partially penetrated into the magnetospheric obstacle. I.Alexeev, 1978, Geomag.&Aeronomia, 18, 447. I.Alexeev et al., 2003, Space Sci. Rev., 107, 7. I.Alexeev, E.Belenkaya, 2005, Ann. Geophys., 23, 809. M.Khodachenko et al., ApJ, 2011 (submitted)

  10. Exoplanet magnetospheres – importance of magnetodisk ●Paraboloid Magnetospheirc Model (PMM) for ‘Hot Jupiters’ Formation of magnetodisk  “sling” model: dipole mag. field can drive plasma in co-rotation regime only inside “Alfvenic surface” (r < RA); Centrifugal inertial escape of plasma for r>RA  “material-escape driven” models:  Hydrodynamicescape of plasma (a) Fully ionized plasma outfow – Similarity with heliospheric current sheet (disk) (b)Partially ionized material outflow Background magn.field (dipole), charge separation electric field, ambipolar diffusion, azimuth.Hall current in equator.plane

  11. Exoplanet magnetospheres – importance of magnetodisk RA dΘ ●Paraboloid Magnetospheirc Model (PMM) for ‘Hot Jupiters’ Formation of magnetodisk – “sling” model (analogy with the Jupiter):  “Alfvénic surface” radius RA Co-rotation until = , RA:  is estimated from thermal mass loss Increase of and  decrease of RA 

  12. Exoplanet magnetospheres – importance of magnetodisk scaled in Jovian parameters  Increase of ωp , dMp(th) /dt  increase of RS ●Paraboloid Magnetospheirc Model (PMM) for ‘Hot Jupiters’ Magnetic field structure in PMM with magnetodisk  r < RA: magnetic field of dipole (~R-3)  r > RA: conservation of m.flux reconnected across the disc  m.field of the disk (and current density)~R-2 Determination of sub-stellar magnetopause distance: pressure balance condition   Decrease of RA increase of RS

  13. Exoplanet magnetospheres – importance of magnetodisk ●Paraboloid Magnetospheirc Model (PMM) for ‘Hot Jupiters’ Magnetosphere at 0.045 AU, RS = 8.0 RJ (tidally locked) Magnetosphere at 0.3 AU, RS = 24.2 RJ (tidally un-locked)

  14. Exoplanet magnetospheres – importance of magnetodisk ●Paraboloid Magnetospheirc Model (PMM) for ‘Hot Jupiters’  magnetospheric parameters (estimated and calculated) (Jupiter)

  15. Conclusions Magnetodisks of close-in giant exoplanets (Hot Jupiters) influence the structure and character of their manetospheres, leading to a new type of „magnetodisk dominated“ magnetosphere. Extended up to (40 – 70) % magnetodisk magnetospheres, as compared the to dipole type ones, may efficiently protect planetary environments, even close to a host star.

More Related