210 likes | 228 Views
This presentation by Mark Heath provides an overview of MBH Management's approach to managing projects and how to measure their strategic value through NPV. It covers topics such as negative NPVs, payback and investment time horizons, and the use of IRR. The presentation also introduces MBH Management, its frustrations with modern consulting practices, and its vision and mission. Attendees will learn about the Managing by Project approach, its selection and prioritization processes, and the benefits of using this approach. The presentation concludes with insights on how to calculate NPV, understand strategic value, consider options, and avoid common pitfalls.
E N D
NPV and Strategic Value Presented by Mark Heath
Overview • Who is MBH Management? • Managing by Project • NPV as a black box • Measuring strategic value • Negative NPVs • Payback and investment time horizons • Using IRR
MBH Management Pty Ltd • Founded in November 1999 • Frustrations of modern consulting practices • Strong growth potential in project management consulting industry
MBH Vision To be an Australian leader in business, environmental and socio-political change management following a Managing by Project approach.
MBH Mission To position the MBH brand as the leader in facilitating business growth and change
What is Managing by Project? • Vision – How a company should look in the long term • Strategy – Approach to achieve the vision • Project selection – Based on the strategic alignment and value created by a project • Project Management – The delivery mechanism for each project selected
MbP – How does it work? • Selection process • Prioritisation process • Directly involves the customer • Use of cross functional teams • Utilises a facilitated workshop approach
MbP – Why use this approach? • Fewer resources (time, money, people) • Fluid structure • Short life • Integrates multiple functions • Minimises non value-adding work • Delivers vision
Project Life Cycle PLAN ACCOMPLISH SOFT HARD PHASE 1 CONCEPT PHASE 2 DEVELOPMENT PHASE 3 IMPLEMENTATION PHASE 4 TERMINATION LEVEL OF EFFORT TIME
Removing the black box • Understand where +ve NPV comes from • Articulate benefit drivers (EVA) • Align project to business strategy
Only NPV is relevant • Not a black box • Measures strategic value • Incorporates risk • Creates instant priority process
Calculating NPV • Benefit drivers • Cost of the project • Ongoing costs • WACC • DCF = NPV
What is strategic value? • Project must be more than “Strategic” • Must add strategic value • Results in competitive advantage • Competitive advantage = +ve NPV • Competitive advantage = strategic value
How is strategic value achieved? • Build on existing strengths • Reduce weaknesses • Create new businesses • Create new options/opportunities • Reduce risk
Negative NPV project • Gut feel says yes • Appears to have competitive advantage • Time horizon is long • Possibilities of follow-on investments • Need to value options
Option pricing and NPV • Value option of follow-on investment • Estimate volatility of forecasts • Estimate time to investment decision • Plug into Black-Scholes formula • Add option value to NPV value • Positive number means project has value
The danger of payback • Short term investment horizons • The need for EPS growth now • Forced by investment analysts time horizons • Investment horizons need to change • Focus on 10 - 15 years rather than 1 - 3. • Remove going concern assumption!
Other assessment tools used • IRR • ROI • Payback • Gut feel • Political decision • CEO says so
Why not IRR • Negative IRR for positive NPV projects • Multiple rates of return possible • Excluding the wrong mutually exclusive project • IRR means NPV = 0 • Prefer NPV > 0!
Conclusion • Utilise MbP approach to business management • NPV & option pricing only for project selection • Understand where the value comes from