1 / 16

Joseph A. Brobst & Eric M. Eslinger School of Education, University of Delaware

Characterizing middle school science teachers’ informal formative assessment strategies and their effects on student inquiry skills . Joseph A. Brobst & Eric M. Eslinger School of Education, University of Delaware. Introduction.

royce
Download Presentation

Joseph A. Brobst & Eric M. Eslinger School of Education, University of Delaware

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Characterizing middle school science teachers’ informal formative assessment strategies and their effects on student inquiry skills Joseph A. Brobst & Eric M. Eslinger School of Education, University of Delaware School of Education

  2. Introduction • Formative assessment – assessment for learning / during the learning process • Informal formative assessment (IFA) – “on the fly” formative assessment during classroom conversations • Student self-regulation / self-assessment • Influenced by & connected to feedback / informal formative assessment • Metacognitive by nature School of Education

  3. Research Question & Hypothesis • RQ: What types of informal formative assessment are used by middle school science teachers during a computer-based inquiry intervention, and how does this IFA influence development of student inquiry skills? • RH: Some of the IFA used will be metacognitive in nature; students often engaged in this type of IFA will show gains in understanding of scientific inquiry. School of Education

  4. Study Context / Participants • University-affiliated laboratory school for students with identified learning disabilities • Two classroom teachers, one reading specialist • 12 students per classroom • “grades” 5-6; 7-8 • Students worked in pairs on laptop computers • Genetics curriculum incorporated into Inquiry Island software program School of Education

  5. Inquiry Island School of Education

  6. Data Sources • Ubiquitous Data Collection • Webcam video captured via Inquiry Island • Two class weeks of video analyzed (approx 32 hours) • Transcribed all assessment interactions • Inquiry Skills Measurement • The Inquiry Test School of Education

  7. Informal Formative Assessment Types Identified • Mechanical “Might want to put a period in there.” • Procedural “These actually go in the evaluate section. You might want to move that stuff.” • Content “What was different about this dark green cross compared to the first one?” • Metacognitive “How do you know?”; “Isn’t that a better question?” School of Education

  8. Case Study Selection • “Ms. Green’s” classroom • Significantly more IFA interactions identified vs. other teacher (n = 91 versus n = 69) • More IFA interactions were metacognitive in nature • Number of students with highest individual Inquiry Test gain scores School of Education

  9. Findings from Case Analysis • Purposes of Metacognitive Informal Formative Assessment • Prompting student assessment of existing science content knowledge • Prompting student assessment of own experimental designs • Accessing students’ nascent knowledge of science content & scientific inquiry School of Education

  10. Prompting student assessment of existing content knowledge • Ms. Green: Well, what about, maybe the color of your eyes is luck and you just got lucky and had the same one that your mom and dad have. • Lisa: No, no. • Ms. Green: How do you know that? • Lisa: Because, they, when, you usually look like your parents 'cause of like genes or...like DNA... • Ms. Green: Well how do you know eye color is a gene, DNA? • Lisa: I don't know! But I just, I know! School of Education

  11. Prompting student assessment of experimental designs • Ms. Green: But back to my question. Can you take the patterns you see here; do you think this is going to be the same for the whole world? Did you test enough... • Lisa: No, not exactly, but... • Ms. Green: Did you test enough people to be able to say your patterns are going to be the same for the whole world? • Lisa: No, we only tested two. If we could get the whole class, then maybe we'd get a little more. • Ms. Green: So how, howwould you rate your sample then? • Lisa: Ehh, I really think we did the best we could do. • Ms. Green: Right, you did what I asked you to do. • Lisa: Yeah, very limited. School of Education

  12. Accessing students’ nascent knowledge • Ms. Green: So what did you get? What answers did you not expect? • Lisa: Um... • Ms. Green: Talk about it first, don't type it. • Lisa: When we had dark green plus dark green we got, um, light, we got two light greens and when we did dark green plus light green...when we did dark green… • Ms. Green: So get all of the things that you learned now into that screen. OK. You should've learned so much that you could fill it up a whole bunch of times if you wanted to. • Lisa: I think we're done. • Ms. Green: OK. You read over it and make sure that you didn't learn anything else in these experiments. OK, 'cause I think you probably learned more than is written. School of Education

  13. Explicit Scaffolding of Student Metacognition • 1 Ms. Green: OK, I know you know a lot. But tell me what you know. • 2 Eddie: Yeah. • 3 Ms. Green: I'm not that little man living inside your head talking to you all the time. Am I? • 4 Phillip: I wish you were, at points. • 5 Ms. Green: Yeah, so you didn't have to do your work, right? • 6 Phillip: [laughs] • 7 Ms. Green: So delete that, and put down what you know. Hang on a second - take turns. Phillip, when you're writing something you know, say it out loud and let Eddie type it so that you can think about your thoughts and not the typing part. And then Eddie, when you're thinking you can let Phillip type for you. School of Education

  14. Additional Finding: Role of Support Personnel in Informal Formative Assessment • Reading Specialist (“Ms. Oliver”) • Focused efforts on Mechanical IFA • Presence “freed” classroom teacher “Ms. Green” to: • Engage in more instances of IFA than other teacher • Focus more on IFA types besides mechanical (including metacognitive) School of Education

  15. Future Work • Investigate informal formative assessment interactions in traditional classroom context • Identify factors that lead to teacher use of metacognitive IFA & explicit, non-evaluative metacognitive scaffolding School of Education

  16. Questions? • Acknowledgments • NARST • University of Delaware School of Education • Teachers, staff, & students of TCS • For their help & insight regarding this presentation & the accompanying paper: Eric Eslinger, Nicole DiGironimo, Bridget Brennan • Paper available at: http://udel.edu/~joebro/narst2009.pdf School of Education

More Related