1 / 22

Oana Ganea CRPE Research 2 June 2014

Oana Ganea CRPE Research 2 June 2014. Bla bla bla. Local Action Groups perception and recom m endations for agricultural association. SUMMARY : Research objectives and methodology Data analysis Most important results Data conclusions Data on respondents.

roza
Download Presentation

Oana Ganea CRPE Research 2 June 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Oana Ganea CRPE Research 2 June 2014 Bla bla bla Local Action Groups perception and recommendationsfor agricultural association

  2. SUMMARY: • Research objectives and methodology • Data analysis • Most important results • Data conclusions • Data on respondents CRPE Research

  3. Objectives and research methodology(1/3) The current research is part of the project “Advocacy for measures supporting the development of sustainable agricultural associations in Romanian Rural Development Program 2014-2020”, implemented by CRPE, in the framework of the “Rural development through entrepreneurship and association” program. The overall objective of the project is to provide expertise to the Romanian Government regarding the public policies that aim to support the economically-driven association processof small and medium farmers in Romania. In the current NRDP (National Rural Development Program) 2014-2020 draft, projects aiming atcreatingassociative entities (cooperatives and agricultural associations) are financially supported, through the measures: a) Cooperation – sub measure Short SupplyChains b) Advisory services- as described in the EC Regulation nr 1305/2013, Art 151, the measure could include the sub-measure proposed by CRPE - „Advisory services for the establishment, registration and support for producer groups”, which provides for financing for the following: 1. Establishing a new entity– up to 200.000 Euros for 5 years; 2. Existing organizations – up to 200.000 Euros for train the trainers activities; 3. 1.500 Euro per advice service (there is no „advice” number limits) c) LEADER axis CRPE Research

  4. Objectives and research methodology(2/3) • The current research is complementary to the studies conducted so far, examining the way Local Action Groups relate to the issue of agricultural association (referring both to the past National Rural Development Program, but also to the next one). • The research results will be used in the following studies and activities organized by the CRPE within the project. • The specific objectives of the research are: • Probing the understanding and attitude of Local Action Groups’ representatives on the issue of farmers association; • Identifying existing associative forms and the extent to which they engage in the functioning of the Local Action Groups (membership) • The extent to which LAGs financed the creation/development of associative forms in the current NRDP; • Collecting Local Action Groups’ proposals to improve the new NRDP, in order to increase the efficiency of projects establishing and supporting the functioning of agricultural associative entities; • Research tool: • Standardized questionnaire, 18 questions CRPE Research

  5. Objectives and research methodology (3/3) • Data collection method: • Self-administered questionnaire, online. • Target population: • Representatives of the 163 Local Action Groups in Romania • Sample • 49 LAGs representatives with key positions (Executive Director, President, Manager, Technical Expert) answered the questionnaire (their geographical distribution in the following slides) CRPE Research

  6. Geographical distribution of the respondents CRPE Research

  7. Geographical distribution of the respondents CRPE Research

  8. Local Action Groups in Romania • In Romania there are currently 163 Local Action Groups, covering a total population of 6.77 million inhabitants and a surface of 141.000 square kilometres (it is estimated that 70% of Local Action Groups geographical expansion potential has been reached) • Based on the approved strategies of NRDP 2007-2013, until nowLocal Action Groupsfinanced 3 645 projects, worth 167.3 mil EURO. • The financial allocation for the LEADER Axis has been doubled in the current NRDP draft (approx. 625 mil EURO) • From the perspective of the association process – it is extremely important for LAGs to include in their strategies innovative and atypical measures (RAF intervention-like), which can include a mix of community animation activities, training, advisoryetc CRPE Research

  9. Economically -driven association– beneficial initiative? Q1. From your perspective, is economically - driven association (agricultural associations, cooperatives, producer groups)a beneficial initiative, meant to increasee competitiveness of small and medium farmers in Romania? Please motivate your answer. Sample: All the respondents, 49, % Only 4% of the respondents believe that economically-driven aassociation is not beneficial CRPE Research

  10. The existence of associative entities across the LAGs 1/2 Q2. Are there any established agricultural associative forms (eg: associations, cooperatives) across the teritory of your LAG? Sample: all respondents, N=49, % Across most of the Local Action Groups teritory (37 out of 49), there are associative forms CRPE Research

  11. The existence of associative entities across the LAGs 2/2 Q3. Are these associative entities members of your Local Action Group? Q5. Do they benefit within the Local Action Group from European financing? Sample: Only respondents from LAGs whose territory include agricultural associative entities (eg: associations, cooperatives). N=37, % Most of the associative forms are members of the Local ActionGroups, but they do not benefit from LAG-managed European funding 30 CRPE Research

  12. Perceptions regarding producers’ intent to create associations Q6. As far as you know, are farmers in your LAG willing to associate? Sample: All respondents, N=49, % More than 50% of the farmers declared that, within their Local Action Groups, producers are willing to associate CRPE Research

  13. Measure establishing associative entities in the Local Action Groups’ strategies Q7. In your current Local Action Group strategy, is there a measure financing the establishment of producer groups? Q8. If Q7=YES: Until now, have you financed the establishment of associative forms (eg: the current Measure 142 - Setting up groups of producers)? Sample: All respondents, N=49, % In almost half of the surveyed Local Action Groups , the strategy included the measure establishing producer groups, but until now, no Local Action Group financed the establishment of any associative entity No funding for the associative forms 23 CRPE Research

  14. Opportunities to finance the establishment and functioning of associations in LAGs. Q12. Do you consider advisable financing the establishment and functioning of agricultural associative entities (agricultural associations, cooperatives, producer groups) in your Local Action Group in the next 7 years (the new NRDP)? Q13. Why would you not include such projectsin your Local Action Group strategy? Sample: All respondents, N=49, % Almost all the respondents consider financing the establishment and functioning ofassociative entities advisable CRPE Research

  15. The attitude of various Local Action Groups entities towards the establishment of producer groups Companies have been reported as the most skeptical as to the establishment of producer groups Q14. What is the attitude ofvarious Local Action Groups entities towards the establishment of producer groups? Sample: All respondents, N=49, % CRPE Research

  16. Improvements of the current situation Q15. Taking into consideration the last EU funds programming period, what do you think should be changed in terms of the support for establishing and financingassociation in agriculture, in order for these entities to become operational? Sample: all respondents, N=40, % CRPE Research

  17. NGOs standing within the Local Action Groups Q16. How many NGOs are members of your Local Action Group? Q17. How many of these would you assess having managed to coagulate the community around common/public interest? Sample: all respondents, N=49, % CRPE Research

  18. Most important results (I) • Across the territory of most of the Local Action Groups (76%) there are established associative entities – most of them are represented by livestock farms and forest/meadow associations – therefore, associations that do not conduct economic activities in common. Few vegetable or cereals associations were nominated; • These associations are members of the Local Action Groups (76%), but haven’t received European financing via the Local Action Group; • More than half of the LAG representatives say that, on the territory of their respective LAG, there are producers who wish to associate  they are aware of the resources and the local vectors that can coagulate around them associative entities; • Half of the surveyed Local Action Groups included in their initial strategies the measure aiming at supporting producer groups, but until now, no LAG has financed any such associative entity. The reasons why these measures failed could make the object of an in-depth study (interviews); • At the same time, the study revealed that the LAGs are willing to finance associative forms in the next seven years (only 3 LAGs said they do not wish to take on such a measure due to the lack of interest on behalf of the farmers). CRPE Research

  19. Most important results (II) According to the respondents, the highest degree of skepticism regarding the establishment of associative entities comes from companies; local authorities have a positive attitude towards associative forms, as 49% of the Local Action Groups representatives declared. Regarding the measures that should be included in the new NRDP, the respondents consider that: Grants made available to associative entities should be bigger, especially for investments; Associations should be assisted in the first three years of functioning (validation of the RAF model); Grants should support the establishment of associative entities, not only their functioning (second validation of RAF program); Associative entities need dedicated tax incentives; Legislation should be simplified and clarified, as most of the time is inconsistent; The salary of a sales agent should be considered as an eligible cost; The financing rate for the projects with a processing component, accessible to producer groups, should be increased; The application form should not require a title property, but the right of usufruct on that respective land. CRPE Research

  20. Conclusions – from the point of view of the RAF program • Logistics centers (food hubs) are extremely necessary (with sorting, packing, minimum processing facilities) • “The group could set up centers for storing and packaging the products; thus, it could become a serious competitor for importers” • Focus points: • Particular attention to the LAGs that declared there are no producers willing to associate within their territories; • The survey may represent a starting point in determining the areas best suitable to finance the associative projects (eg: by establishing a set of indicators targeting specific categories: Q1,Q6,Q7,Q12) – the LAGs aggregating the biggest number of positive answers are the most suited to be included in a project stimulating the creation of associations; • Reflection points: • The topic of investments necessary to support associative entities is part of most of the answers offered by the LAGs. Are the new structures ready to support investment projects from the very establishment? • Ways to include atypical measures (following a similar methodology to the one proposed by the RAF program) in the new LAGs strategies. CRPE Research

  21. Data about the respondents CRPE Research

  22. We would like to thank the National Federation of Local Action Groups for their support in applying this survey! CRPE Research

More Related