1 / 30

High Fidelity! Corporate Theft and Recovery

High Fidelity! Corporate Theft and Recovery. Geoff Harrold , The Gavilon Group Alex Lathrop, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP. Section I. Introduction. Employee Crime Statistics. $50B stolen by employees of US businesses (2013) An increase of 7% from 2011

rozene
Download Presentation

High Fidelity! Corporate Theft and Recovery

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. High Fidelity!Corporate Theft and Recovery Geoff Harrold, The Gavilon Group Alex Lathrop, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP

  2. Section I Introduction

  3. Employee Crime Statistics • $50B stolen by employees of US businesses (2013) • An increase of 7% from 2011 • 75% of employees have stolen at least once from their employer • 5% of annual revenues are lost to theft or fraud • Theft is conducted by: • Men: 59.1% of the time • Women: 40.9% of the time

  4. Employee Crime Statistics • Employee theft occurs most often at: • Convenience stores • Truck stops • Apparel stores • Office supply/stationery stores • Small businesses also are prone to employee theft as internal controls are not as established

  5. Employee Theft Schemes • As the usage of cash decreases, employees have shifted to stealing material/physical items (inventory) • Corporate credit cards make it easier for employees to disguise charging personal expenses to the company • Employees often falsify time records and number of hours worked in order to be paid more by the company

  6. Detecting Employee Theft • Tips are the most common method of initial detection • Top three sources of tips • Employee tips (51%) • Customer tips (22%) • Anonymous tips (12.4%) • Organizations that use a hotline experience a 44.4% lower median fraud loss

  7. Take Away • Employee theft presents a substantial loss exposure to most companies • Risk Managers must have effective loss control measures in place and be sure the Company is adequately insured

  8. Section II The Case of the Stolen Grain

  9. Background • Gavilon • Managing Essential Ag Commodities on a Global basis • Second largest grain handler based on licensed storage • The Case Study location • Storage capacity of 7.5M tons of grain • Trucks enter the facility, weigh in empty, truck is filled with grain, weigh out full, and depart • Entire process takes about 12 minutes per truck

  10. The Case Study Facility

  11. Discovery of the Loss • First Evidence of the Loss • Tip from customer • Confirming the Loss • Conducted Internal Audit of Inventory • Confirmed missing stock

  12. Investigating the Loss • Hired third-party surveillance company • Observed trucking operations for several nights • During certain periods, trucks would enter and exit with full loads in less than four minutes • Local Law Enforcement • Interviewed night crew • Thefts took place when one employee went on breaks • Remaining employee was colluding with truck drivers

  13. Insurance Issues – Employee Requirement • Must be an employee • Insuring Agreement • Loss must result from dishonest or fraudulent acts “committed by an Employee acting alone or in collusion with others” • Had to show that truck drivers were in collusion with storage facility employee

  14. Insurance Issues – Inventory Computation Exclusion • Missing inventory cannot be the sole evidence of the loss • Evidence of loss included customer tip and surveillance • Inventory audit confirmed the quantity of the loss

  15. Quantifying the Loss • Bulk Commodities • Challenge of bulk commodities • Physical Dimensions • Size – Angle of Repose - Expertise • Weight of Product • The Storage Barn is Seldom Empty • Accounting records • Scale Tickets • Invoices

  16. Quantifying the Loss • Accounting records • Historical throughput • Seasonal adjustments • Historical pricing • Traded on an exchange? • Independent Verification • Profit Margin • Accounting systems

  17. Insurance Issues – Proof of Loss • Describe all facts establishing that loss occurred, nature of the theft, that employees participated • Interviews/testimony of employee in underlying matter may include denials inherently in tension with coverage claim • Provide an accounting of the loss—quantum, dollar value • Statement must be sworn • Deadline is condition precedent to coverage—but insurer will grant extension on reasonable request • Important to involve professional support immediately

  18. Insurance Issues – Documenting the Loss • Forensic Investigation • Interviews • Law Enforcement and Prosecutorial Authorities • Outside Evidence

  19. Lessons Learned • An ounce of prevention • Frequent and unscheduled audits • Use of a third party for unscheduled audits • Rotate employees and shifts worked • Manager present during all shifts • Criminal Background Checks • Engage a Forensic Accountant before a loss • Endorse Crime Policy to include fees • Think like a criminal • Contemplate the records and documents needed before a loss

  20. Preventing a Loss • Physical Deterrents • Fencing, lighting, gates • CCTV and Security Cameras • Security Staff • Restrict Access • Vulnerability Assessment • Metaphysical Deterrents • Local Authorities – Fire and Law Enforcement • Be a good neighbor

  21. Section III Coverage for Employee Theft

  22. Fidelity Bond Components • Insuring Agreement • Employee Involvement • “Manifest Intent” • To Gain and/or Cause Loss • Exclusions • Conditions

  23. Insuring Agreement • We will pay for loss resulting directly from dishonest or fraudulent acts . . . committed by an Employee acting alone or in collusion with others . . . with the manifest [or specific] intent to: • Cause you to sustain such loss; [and/or] • Obtain an improper financial benefit for the Employee or another person or entity.

  24. Manifest Intent • Must be discernible intention (objective/subjective) • to cause Loss to Company and/or benefit to employee or others • Does not include Employee Compensation (per insuring agreement or by exclusion) • Loss must be direct result of employee acts

  25. Some Common Exclusions • Inventory computation exclusion • Timing of loss and claim • Directors and officers • “Damages” or indirect or consequential losses • Losses resulting exclusively from acts of non-employees

  26. Limitations on Recovery • Timing related limitations • Variable limits/sublimits related to type of loss • Non-cumulation provisions

  27. Tendering and Supporting Your Claim • Deadlines • Policies are “claims made and reported” • Provide prompt notice of claim • Provide proof of loss • Engage forensic accountant, investigator and/or counsel, if required, early!

  28. Litigation Considerations • Documentation of claim (causation, participants, quantum of loss) must be well developed • Supporting experts lined up • Witnesses lined up/credible • Anticipate and prepare responses to insurer coverage arguments • What is the cost-benefit analysis for litigation? • Would compromise make sense?

  29. Negotiated Settlements • Insurers may dispute coverage because they do not agree with proof that (1) an employee was involved; (2) there was manifest intent; (3) that proof was consistent with conditions and exclusions; or (4) quantum of loss was proved • Such disputes often can be compromised in a direct meeting with the insurer • Be prepared to (1) lay out the factual case for coverage; (2) demonstrate quantum; (3) address legal issues head-on; and (4) compromise weaker points • Involve your forensic accountant, investigators, and counsel

More Related