1 / 16

Bristol Mind

Bristol Mind. Effective involvement in mental health services: the role of assertive outreach and the voluntary sector. Aim of the study.

rrossi
Download Presentation

Bristol Mind

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Bristol Mind Effective involvement in mental health services: the role of assertive outreach and the voluntary sector

  2. Aim of the study To explore in depth how voluntary and statutory services can best work to promote effective access to services for people with severe mental illness who are perceived as being ‘hard to engage’ by those services. • Black and minority ethnic groups • Gypsies and Travellers

  3. Methodology • Qualitative interviews • Topic guide to provide some structure • Recorded and transcribed • Thematic analysis (coded using MAXqda) • Staff focus groups • Recorded, transcribed and analysed for themes (coded using MAXqda) • Mapping exercise • Questionnaires with both quantitative and qualitative questions

  4. Sample Groups Sample Groups People who • Had used assertive outreach services (AO) - 20 • Had used voluntary outreach services (VO) - 12 • Had gone out of contact with specialist mental health services (OOC) - 15 • Carers - 9 Black and minority ethnic groups – 20 of those Gypsies and Travellers - 9 Total = 64 service users/avoiders and 9 carers Plus 32 staff (in 5 focus groups)

  5. Service user focus and involvement • Shaping the proposal • Design of the research • Preliminary interviews shaped topic guide • Researchers had used services and shared this information with participants • Members of the Advisory Group and Steering Group • Dissemination of findings • Aim to improve services

  6. Most people wanted help • Most people in all sample groups wanted help for their problems • Nonetheless they had problems accessing services • People avoided services that did not respond to theirpriorities or offer what they wanted

  7. Relationships Consistent relationships with a few staff Varied views relating to professionalism/informality Participants wanted staff who were • Persistent and sought them out • Friendly, approachable and who listened and cared • Trustworthy • Offered respect and did not judge • ‘Like me’ • Willing to ‘go the extra mile’

  8. Broad range of support • Wide range of support wanted • Accommodation and money most important • Practical help with everyday living, activities and social support

  9. Informal emotional support • ‘Being there’ and listening to problems • Need for informal ‘therapeutic’ support • Talking therapies • Some people wanted more access • Some did not want them or found them unhelpful • People valued advocacy style support

  10. Medication • Significant issue – varied views • All that is on offer • Should not be the only focus of help • Staff push medication • Concern about high levels and side effects • For some medication was seen as important and/or needed • Often a reason for disengaging

  11. What undermined engagement • Having drug and alcohol problems • Mental health services intrusive and controlling • Being sectioned, forcibly medicated and inpatient stays

  12. BME Groups excluding Gypsies and Travellers • No significant differences in range of views expressed • Most people felt staff were respectful

  13. Gypsies and Travellers • Not accessing statutory or voluntary outreach services • Different approach needed to involve people in the study • Recruitment • Language • Findings have been written up separately

  14. Over-arching themes • People want help focused on their own priorities • Need for more flexible and responsive approach to relationships between users and staff • Need for both consistent relationships and a broad range of support including specialist support – significant challenge for service provision

  15. Recommendations • Avoid labelling people as ‘hard to engage’ • Focus on user priorities • Recognise the importance of relationships • Offer a range of support • Improve access to mental health care and integrated care for dual diagnosis • Maintain and develop a commitment to assertive outreach and complementary voluntary outreach provision • Address perverse incentives and reward organisations for working together in the longer term • Consider using outreach services for other marginalised and excluded groups, for example, Gypsies and Travellers

  16. Thank you Rosie Davies Assertive Outreach Research Project Bristol Mind, 35 Old Market Street Bristol BS2 0EZ assertiveoutreach@bristolmind.org.uk www.bristolmind.org.uk

More Related