1 / 29

SBAS Satellite Selection & Monitoring: Ensuring Optimal Performance in GNSS

Explore the challenges and criteria for selecting SBAS satellites in GNSS systems to enhance navigation accuracy. Learn about the importance of monitoring satellite performance in various regions and airspace.

rubio
Download Presentation

SBAS Satellite Selection & Monitoring: Ensuring Optimal Performance in GNSS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ION GNSS+ 2014 Tampa, FL Sept. 8-12, 2014 SBAS Satellite Selection and Performance Monitoring at the Region Where Multiple SBAS are Available Takeyasu Sakai, Kazuaki Hoshinoo, and Ken Ito Electronic Navigation Research Institute

  2. Introduction • SBAS Selection Problem: • We already have four operational SBAS served by the US, Japan, Europe, and India; • A possible issue for users in Enroute to NPA flight modes: An SBAS does not broadcast any information on the service area of SBAS nor information on which SBAS should be used; The current SBAS specifications do not define any procedure, or satellite selection criteria, to be used by receivers to choose SBAS satellites for use; • In order to investigate the situation, the authors considered the expected NPA (or RNP0.3) availability for some SBAS selection criteria based on the actual broadcast message of MSAS and GAGAN. • Necessity of Monitoring: • Monitoring the performance of the system operated by other Statesin a specific airspace as a responsibility of ANSP for the airspace; • As an example, a result of evaluation of the performance of GAGAN in Japanese territory is shown.

  3. Motivation Geostationary Satellites: MSAS MTSAT-1R @140E MTSAT-2 @145E GAGAN GSAT-8 @55E GSAT-10 @83E GSAT-8 MTSAT-1R GSAT-10 MTSAT-2 • India began the operation of GAGAN in Feb. 2014 by removing MT0; • In Japan, we can receive GAGAN signals in addition to MSAS signals; • Which SBAS does the SBAS-receiver use for augmentation? • Likely MSAS, but using GAGAN is allowed and possible; • There is some reports on observation of some receivers using GAGAN.

  4. MSAS NPA-Mode Availability Available Without GPS Outage 1 Critical GPS Out • NPA mode (RNP0.3 for Enroute) availability for 3 days of May 25 to 27, 2014; • MSAS has been serving NPA mode horizontal navigation with 100% availability over almost whole of Fukuoka (Japanese) FIR; • In condition of 1 critical GPS out, the area with NPA service is largely reduced and roughly half of the FIR is supported with 100% availability.

  5. GAGAN NPA-Mode Availability Available Without GPS Outage 1 Critical GPS Out • For GAGAN, the area with NPA service is larger than MSAS; • Without any GPS satellite outage, NPA mode availability is 100% over almost whole of India FIR, while the area with NPA service is largely reduced if 1 critical GPS is out; • In Japan, GAGAN can provide NPA service with 95 to 100% availability.

  6. Other Systems • Russian SDCM (System for Differential Corrections and Monitoring): • Already broadcasting test signal from their geostationary satellites. • Consists of 3 geostationary satellites: • Luch-5A launched in 2011 at 167E • Luch-5B launched in 2012 at 16W • Luch-5V to be launched in 2014 and placed at 95E • In Japan, signals from Luch-5A and Luch-5V are possibly received; We have already received PRN140 signal from Luch-5A. • Chinese SNAS: • Served as a part of BeiDou Satellite Navigation System; • Consists 3 Geostationary satellites at 80E, 110E, and 140E; All signals can be received in Japan. • Korean K-SBAS: • Potentially 1 or 2 more SBAS geostationary satellites by around 2020.

  7. SDCM SNAS Operational Operational Operational Operational Since 2003 Since 2011 Since 2007 Since 2014 SACCSA SBAS in the World

  8. SBAS Selection Issue • SBAS does not broadcast any information for selection: • No information on the service area of SBAS and no information on which SBAS should be used by a user in NPA mode; • For PA mode, FAS (Final Approach Segment) data specifies SBAS to be used. • SBAS specifications: • The ICAO SBAS SARPS and RTCA WAAS MOPS do not define the specific procedure, or satellite selection criteria, to be used by receivers. • The RTCA MOPS states an option for SBAS selection as a note: “Selecting the SBAS satellite with the highest elevation angle that is broadcasting applicable ionospheric corrections is normally sufficient.” • Receiver manufacturers have no restriction on the algorithm for the selection; Each user receiver has its own satellite selection scheme if it is tracking multiple SBAS signals; The situation depends on the implementation. • What are possible criteria for SBAS selection?

  9. Possible Criteria • SBAS Satellite Selection Criteria: • In the literature by Jed Dennis at the ION ITM 2014, some possible criteria are listed and evaluated; • Here we consider possible criteria which do not need human interaction and/or database information. • Elevation Angle [EL]: • Selects SBAS signal coming from the highest elevation angle; • SBAS selection becomes a function of longitude of receiver location only; • No direct relationship with distribution of SBAS ground network which dominates the spatial extent to which the augmentation information can be applied.

  10. Possible Criteria • Elevation Angle and Ionosphere [ELi]: • Selects SBAS signal coming from the highest elevation angle and providing the applicable ionospheric correction information; • Straightforward implementation along with the note of MOPS; • Here we assume the determination if the applicable ionospheric information is or not is done by testing the availability of IGPs at the user location; • This option does not directly reflect the distribution of ground network, but ionosphere information cannot be obtained at the location far away from the service area. • Protection Levels [HPL] [VPL]: • Selects SBAS signal giving lower protection level (HPL or VPL) which means better performance; • In the NPA mode, it is natural to employ HPL for the selection because SBAS gives just a horizontal navigation; Selection based on VPL is also possible; • Advantage: Reflects the performance of each SBAS in real time. • Computational load inside the receiver is relatively high.

  11. Possible Criteria • Number of Satellites [NSV]: • Selects SBAS signal which gives the largest number of GPS satellites available; • Reflects the spatial relationship between each GPS satellite and the ground network in real time. • Degradation of Correction [dUDRE]: • Selects SBAS signal giving less dUDRE; • The dUDRE indicates spatial degradation of the accuracy of correction information for each GPS satellite; Basically dUDRE grows larger if the GPS satellite goes away from the ground monitoring network; • This criterion is computed for each individual GPS satellite, not for the SBAS itself; Here we assume that the receiver compares the number of GPS satellites which gives lower dUDRE than the other SBAS, and selects the SBAS which have the largest number of such GPS satellites. • Reflects the spatial relationship between each GPS satellite and the ground network in real time. • The computational load would be medium.

  12. Possible Criteria • Here we assume GAGAN-preferred receiver: It is assumed that GAGAN is selected in case of the equal evaluation between two SBAS for [NSV] and [dUDRE].

  13. SBAS Selection [EL] [ELi] Selection by [EL] Selection by [ELi] • GAGAN selection rate for [EL] and [ELi]; • SBAS selection is a function of longitude of user location; • The border is 111.5E = mean of 83E (GSAT-10) and 140E (MTSAT-1R); • This option has the temporal invariance: The result is simply 0% or 100%; • With ionosphere option, the spatial relationship is reflected a little.

  14. SBAS Selection [HPL] [VPL] Selection by [HPL] Selection by [VPL] • GAGAN selection rate for [HPL] and [VPL]; • Show which SBAS gives the lower HPL/VPL between MSAS and GAGAN as a function of user location. • The performances of MSAS and GAGAN are different; At the transition region, GAGAN likely provides the better performance than MSAS.

  15. SBAS Selection [NSV] [dUDRE] Selection by [NSV] Selection by [dUDRE] • GAGAN selection rate for [NSV] and [dUDRE]; • [NSV] Smooth and linear characteristics along with a line connecting the centroids of ground networks of both SBAS. • [dUDRE] Possibly remote monitor stations of MSAS in Hawaii and Australia contribute to the better orbit determination and thus to provide the lower dUDRE.

  16. NPA Availability: GAGAN Only GAGAN Only GAGAN Only (1 GPS OUT) • Baseline GAGAN NPA availability with no SBAS selection: A case that MSAS is not available.

  17. NPA Availability [EL] Selection by [EL] Selection by [EL] (1 GPS OUT) • NPA availability with SBAS selection of the option [EL]; • Switching two SBAS improves availability largely and expand the area where NPA mode is available; Navigation is available if either two SBAS is available; • But this option is not the optimum solution.

  18. NPA Availability [ELi] Selection by [ELi] Selection by [ELi] Selection by [ELi] (1 GPS OUT) Selection by [ELi] (1 GPS OUT) • NPA availability with SBAS selection of the option [ELi]; • Ionosphere restriction reduces availability at the edge of the service area of either SBAS.

  19. NPA Availability [HPL] Selection by [HPL] Selection by [HPL] (1 GPS OUT) • NPA availability with SBAS selection of the option [HPL]; • This option gives the best availability characteristics among candidate criteria; This option is the optimum solution giving the largest area of 100% NPA availability.

  20. NPA Availability [VPL] Selection by [VPL] Selection by [VPL] (1 GPS OUT) • NPA availability with SBAS selection of the option [VPL]; • The characteristics is similar to [HPL] but sub-optimum because availability of NPA mode is determined based on HPL.

  21. NPA Availability [NSV] Selection by [NSV] Selection by [NSV] (1 GPS OUT) • NPA availability with SBAS selection of the option [NSV]; • Availability is similar to [HPL] and [VPL] in case of no GPS outage; • In case of 1 critical GPS out, availability is better than [EL] and [ELi], but lower than [HPL] and [VPL], somewhere for example Philippine Sea.

  22. NPA Availability [dUDRE] Selection by [dUDRE] Selection by [dUDRE] (1 GPS OUT) • NPA availability with SBAS selection of the option [dUDRE]; • Availability degrades from [NSV] although this option requires more computational load.

  23. Combined Use of SBAS • Simultaneous usage of multiple SBAS: • The MOPS allows receivers in the NPA mode to use multiple SBAS simultaneously; • The receivers have an option to use a combination of GPS satellites augmented by an SBAS and other GPS satellites augmented by another SBAS which may be operated by a different service provider; • Ionosphere correction is made by GPS navigation message other than SBAS; • In the current situation, receivers in South East Asia receiving MSAS and GAGAN may operate in such a way. • Computation of availability achieved by multiple SBAS: • Assumed procedure in the receiver: (i) Determine the primary SBAS based on one of the selection criteria; (ii) Apply augmentation information provided by the primary SBAS to GPS satellites augmented by the SBAS; (iii) For remaining GPS satellites, apply augmentation information provided by the other SBAS with consideration of time offset by adding 100ns to uncertainties of range measurements of these GPS satellites as described in the MOPS.

  24. Baseline: SBAS Selection [HPL] Selection by [HPL] Selection by [HPL] (1 GPS OUT) • NPA availability with SBAS selection of the option [HPL]; • Investigates if combined use of SBAS improves availability from this baseline or not; In other words, identifies advantage of receivers which have the algorithm of combined use of multiple SBAS.

  25. Combined Use Combined Use: GAGAN+MSAS Combined use: GAGAN+MSAS (1 GPS OUT) • Combined use of SBAS based on [EL] achieves availability better than the result of single SBAS selection by option [HPL]; • Results of other options are very similar.

  26. Combined Use Select GAGAN or MSAS Combined use: GAGAN+MSAS • Comparison of NPA availability between single SBAS and combined use of SBAS in case of 1 critical GPS out; • Combined use of SBAS even based on selection option [EL] achieves availability better than the result of single SBAS selection by option [HPL].

  27. Monitoring SBAS • Monitoring SBAS: • Another issue might be the necessity of monitoring the performance of the system operated by other States; • SBAS is used as a primary means of navigation; Is it allowable to fly in the airspace of a State dependently upon a primary means of navigation provided by another State? • A possible way to relax legal issues caused by using SBAS operated by another State is to monitor the performance of the SBAS; If necessary, warn to users in the airspace in case that the SBAS should not be used; • Actually, in Spring, MSAS has broadcast messages with illegal preambles. • GNSS Monitor System: • In order to monitor an SBAS, one also needs to monitor GPS satellites augmented by the SBAS to check correctness of augmentation information; • Japan intends to implement monitor systems for GNSS including GPS and SBAS whose signal can be received in Japanese territory.

  28. GAGAN Integrity at Tokyo All-in-View Mode All Possible Combinations • Triangle chart comparing HPL and the associated position error provided by GAGAN GSAT-10 in Tokyo, Japan; • The availability of NPA mode is 97.8% for all-in-view receivers; • In terms of safety assurance, all possible combinations should be tested like the chart at the right; Unsafe condition that the error exceeds HPL did not occur for this period; • Furthermore, all possible combinations of active SBAS messages should be tested.

  29. Conclusion • SBAS Selection Problem: • The current SBAS specifications do not define any procedure, or satellite selection criteria, to be used by receivers to choose SBAS satellites for use; • The expected NPA (RNP0.3 for Enroute) availability for some SBAS selection criteria is computed based on the actual broadcast message of MSAS and GAGAN; • Criteria based on HPL or NSV have advantage to other options like a selection by elevation angle; • Combined use of SBAS also improves availability. • Necessity of Monitoring: • Monitoring the performance of the system operated by other States; • As an example, a result of evaluation of the performance of GAGAN in Japanese territory was shown; • It is necessary to test all possible combinations of ranging sources and augmentation information for integrity assurance.

More Related