1 / 18

HIPSSA Project

HIPSSA Project. Support for Harmonization of the ICT Policies in Sub-Sahara Africa. Tanzania Computer Crime and Cybercrime Bill - Basic Principles. Introduction:

rumer
Download Presentation

HIPSSA Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HIPSSA Project Support for Harmonization of the ICT Policies in Sub-Sahara Africa Tanzania Computer Crime and Cybercrime Bill - Basic Principles

  2. Introduction: Cybercrime is the fastest growing crime in the world with millions of people affected every day. The effects of one successful attack on a country or corporation can have far-reaching implications, including threat to country’s security and economy to financial losses at the corporate level, stock losses and money lost for consumers or stock holders. Laws have been swiftly put into place to halt these types of attacks, but criminals find haven in countries with lax cybercrime laws. Computer crimes

  3. International Conventions and Treaties on Cybercrime: • Criminalize Crimes related to computers and the Internet [Cybercrime] • Provisions for investigating cyber crime • International legal cooperation • Protection of human rights and liberties International Standards

  4. Domestic laws: • Establish cyber crime offenses • Enable successful investigation and prosecution • Provide for Procedural laws • Improve international legal cooperation Domestic Laws

  5. Offences against the confidentiality, integrity and availability of computer data and systems, that is: • offences against computer data and systems, including illegal access, • illegal interception, data and system interference, misuse of devices. Computer Crimes Bill: Silent Features

  6. Offences committed by means of computer systems. This list is limited to those “old” forms of crime that obtain a new quality through the use of computers, that is: computer-related forgery and fraud, child pornography and offences related to infringements of Intellectual Property Rights on a commercial scale. • An additional set of crimes covers the criminalization of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems Silent Features

  7. Cybercrimes: • Offenses against computer data and systems • Offenses related to computers and the Internet • Content-related offenses • Intellectual property offenses • Ancillary liability and sanctions Computer crimes

  8. What evidence does using computers, cell phones, and the Internet create? • Copies (Content Data) • Logs (Traffic Data) • Metadata (Traffic Data) Where is this evidence located? • In the file • On the device • With the service provider Investigation of Computer Crimes

  9. Short term • RAM • Cache Long term • Hard drives • Backups Computer Data Storage

  10. RAM (Random Access Memory) • Where the magic happens • Only exists when the device is on • SWAP File • Not enough RAM on most computers • Write some data to the hard drive in temporary data files • Often still there when the computer turns back on Cache • “Temporary” local storage of data • Often in temporary folders in long term data storage devices • May still be there after computer restarts • Temporary Internet Files • Local backups Short Term Data Storage

  11. On the computer • Usually hard drives, sometimes flash • Content data in files • Some metadata • Table of contents • Shows where the data is • Deletes only from contents unless overwritten Long Term Data Storage

  12. Backups • On variety of media • Tape • DVD • CD • Remote server (backup service, email, drop box) • Floppy disks • Thumb drives • Often off site Long Term Data Storage

  13. Content Data • Most files have timestamps and author information • Similar to traffic data • Some files, such as documents and pictures, may have more detailed information about the file (metadata), • Author’s name • Author’s company • Computer name • Where the file was created (or picture was taken) • When the file was created and changed • Name of the network server where the file was saved • Revisions • Previous versions • Hidden text/objects • Comments • Other file properties and summary information Data Files

  14. Challenges to law enforcement: • Identifying the perpetrator and extent of the crime • Volatility of electronic data • Need for fast and confidential investigations • Need for successful prosecutions Law Enforcement

  15. Trust Bank Ltd. v. Le-marsh Enterprises Ltd., Joseph Mbui Magari, Lawrence Macharia [The High Court of United Republic of Tanzania (Commercial Division) at Dar es Salaam Commercial case No.4 of 2000 (Unreported)] Tanzania Case Law

  16. Onel de Guzman (a former computer science student) was identified as the person responsible for creating and disseminating the 'love bug' virus. However, Philippine law did not criminalize hacking or the distribution of viruses. The Philippine officials struggled with the question of how to prosecute De Guzman. They finally charged him with theft and credit card fraud but the charges were dismissed. De Guzman could not be extradited for prosecution in other countries such as the US (which has cybercrime laws) because the conduct attributed to De Guzman was not a crime in the Philippines. Extradition treaties require 'double criminality', namely the act for which a person is extradited must be a crime in both the extraditing country and the country seeking the extradition. De Guzman could not be charged for disseminating the 'love bug' virus. No one was prosecuted for the 'love bug' virus. Love Bug Virus

  17. Director of Public Prosecution v Sutcliffe an Australian citizen, Brian Sutcliffe, was accused of stalking a Canadian actress who lived in Toronto. The charges were based on Sutcliffe's having telephoned the victim and written to her repeatedly over several years. The Australian prosecutor charged Sutcliffe with stalking but the magistrate dismissed the charges. The magistrate found that she lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter because the crime of stalking occurred in Canada, where the victim was located. However, the Supreme Court of Victoria reversed the decision. The Court found that Sutcliffe was a resident of Australia and had committed all of the ingredients of the crime "save for the harmful effect" in Australia. Therefore, it was held that his conduct and presence in Australia established a "sufficient connection" to allow the court to exercise jurisdiction over the proceedings. Case Law-Jurisdiction

  18. Asante… Saidi M. Kalunde ITU LOCAL EXPERT saidimj@gmail.com Union Internationale des Télécommunications International Telecommunication Union

More Related