220 likes | 435 Views
E N D
2. Demonstrate the importance of a thin aquitard in a regional flow system
Show how regional and local characterizations differ
Purpose of this talk…
4. Units in the “sandstone” aquifer
6. Eau Claire aquitard is not the same as Eau Claire Formation
8. Aquitard presence indicated by gamma signature and head drop
9. Is the aquitard continuous?
10. Thickness of “shale” facies ranges from 50 meters to absent in Dane County
11. Hydraulic conductivity Kh= 6 x 10-5 m/day (packer/slug tests)
Kv = 2.2x10-4 m/day (regional model calibration)
12. Eau Claire aquitard
13. Pumping has caused significant drawdown in the deep sandstone aquifer and steep vertical hydraulic gradients across the aquitard
15. Regional conclusion Eau Claire is a “good” aquitard, and is a key part of the regional groundwater system
In general, water beneath the aquitard should be quite old (100’s-1000’s of years)
16. Profiles of head in the interior of aquitards are critical for understanding and evaluation Hydrostratigraphy often does not match “classic” rock stratigraphy
Hydraulic properties not always apparent from lithology
Aquitards are rarely monolithic or uniform
17. Packer results – aquitard interval
18. Aquitard characterization:
19. Locally, viruses detected in deep groundwater in two city wells
21. Human enteric viruses were detected in two wells cased below the aquitard
23. Implications Describing the three-dimensional spatial distribution and hydrogeologic properties of aquitards at all scales is essential for proper understanding and predictive simulation of groundwater systems.
Aquitards should receive the same attention as aquifers in groundwater investigations
Regional- and local-scale properties may differ
The roles of heterogeneities, fractures, and well construction should not be ignored