610 likes | 637 Views
Biology 331 Genetics. Population Genetics (Microevolution). Introduction to Evolution:. Population Genetics (Microevolution): Evolution occurring at and below the species level Macroevolution: Evolution occurring at and above the species level
E N D
Biology 331 Genetics Population Genetics (Microevolution)
Introduction to Evolution: • Population Genetics (Microevolution): • Evolution occurring at and below the species level • Macroevolution: • Evolution occurring at and above the species level • Outgrowth of agricultural revolution in the 20's-40's
Modern importance of population genetics: • Agriculture • Other genetic engineering • Forensics • Medicine • Conservation • "Pure" Science • speciation, systematics, evolution of behaviors etc.
Variation • Qualitative • Quantitative
Evolution: • What is it? • Means Change • Biological/Organic Evolution Change in an organism over time • Change in allele frequency over time • Not = Natural Selection
Natural Selection: How does it work? • More offspring are produced than can survive (Species could reproduce at an exponential rate) • Most populations have a stable size • Therefore: There is a struggle for existence • Members of a population vary in their characteristics • (short, tall, fast, slow) • Much of this variation is heritable • Therefore: Struggle for existence is not random. It depends on individual characteristics • (which are heritable)
Natural Selection Continued • Those which are best adapted to the environment survive and reproduce (Differential Reproduction) • Over time this process brings about changes in populations with favorable changes accumulating. • Examples: • Cheetah's Speed, Cow's Milk etc. • Fitness: • The ability of an organism to leave offspring in a given environment • Genetics: • Darwin lacked a method. Mechanism provided by the monk Gregor Mendel. 1932-1953 modern synthesis
Items of note: • Selection on individuals, but individuals do not evolve, populations do • Natural selection acts on phenotypes but evolution is change in gene frequency • Natural selection does not "think ahead". Selects organisms adapted to past environments. But, some traits may be • favorable in new environments • human bipedalism • Natural Selection acts only on existing traits, variation is crucial • Natural selection results in organisms better adapted for an environment...NOT optimally designed • human bipedalism • Natural selection normally acts on individuals not groups/species.
Hardy-Weinberg: An introduction
Hardy-Weinberg Theorem: • Allele frequencies stay constant if there is no selection and it's other assumptions are met • Thus if we have 25% green eye genes, 25% blue eye genes, and 50% brown eye genes it will stay that way. • Heterozygosity will also stay the same
Two allele equation: • p2 + 2pq + q2 = 1 • p= frequency of allele A • q = Frequency of allele a • p + q = 1. • So p2 = AA, q2 = aa, and pq = Aa
Assumptions: • Random mating • Very large Population size • Diploid • Sexual • Non-overlapping generations • No migration • No mutation • No selection.
So what good is it? • Provides an evolutionary baseline • Calculate deviations from the H.W. Ideal
Hardy-Weinberg and Selection: • Problem #1 • Assume a population has two co-dominant alleles for a gene (B, B') • Assume there are 1000 individuals, 250BB, 500BB', and 250B'B' • So: Freq. B = 500+500/2000 = .5; B'= 500+500/1000 = .5 • Assuming H.W. BB = p2 = .25; BB'= 2pq = .5; B'B'= q2 = .25 (No Change)
Add Selection: • Fitness = Survival (for this example) • BB = 1; BB'= 0.9, B'B'= 0.8 • BB = 250; BB'= 0.9(500) = 450; B'B'= 0.8(250) =200 • Frequency BB = 250/900 = .278; BB'= 450/900 = 0.5; B'B'= 200/900 = .222 • Frequency B = .278+1/2(.5) = .528, B' = .472 • Deviation From H.W.!
Frequency dependant selection • Fitness of an allele depends upon its frequency
Mutation and Hardy Weinberg: • Assume p has a frequency of 1 • What is the frequency of q ? • Now allow a mutation to occur from p to q • Instant evolution! • But is this a "strong" evolutionary effect? • Highest rate of mutation recorded is 0.0007/mutant cells/cell division • Result....no real effect over one generation • Over time? • Mutation alone is typically a weak evolutionary force
So why does in matter? • Raw material for evolution • Creates new genes • Mutation selection balance
Migration: Transfer of alleles from one gene pool to another
One island model: • Assume you have genotypes A1A1, A1A2, A2A2 • frequencies p2, 2pq, and q2 • A1 is fixed on the continent; A2 is fixed on the island • N on the island is much smaller than on the continent • Migration (m) from the continent to the island is more important than vice versa (Why?) • m=20% of the island population/generation • A1A1 = 0.2 after migration (was 0) • A2A2 = 0.8 after migration (was 1.0) • Not H.W. equilibrium • Both allele frequencies and genotype frequencies changed
Long term effect?? • The general effect of migration is homogenization • This effect is proportional to m, and the difference between Pc and PI • Migration selection balance • Migration as mutation
Genetic Drift: • Random variation in allele frequencies due to sampling error • Yields evolution but not necessarily adaptation • Drift more important in small populations • Coin flipping/beanbag examples
Absorbing States: • The random fixation of alleles • The frequencies of alleles vary through time • Eventually alleles go to either fixation or loss • Assumes no Migration, mutation, selection etc. • Probability of loss or fixation proportional to initial frequency • "C" allele example
What determines probability of loss? Probability of loss or fixation proportional to initial frequency So why does population size matter? "C" allele example
Bottle Necks: • "Random" reduction in population size (Disasters) • Only a fraction of the alleles in the initial population survive • "Instant" Evolution (sampling error) • Small population size after the bottleneck enhances drift • Repeated bottlenecks have huge effect! • European Jews, Lynx, Whales • S. African Cheetahs and Northern Elephant seals almost "Clones"
Bottlenecks • "Instant" Evolution (sampling error) • Small population size after the bottleneck enhances drift • Repeated bottlenecks have huge effect! • European Jews, Lynx, Whales • S. African Cheetahs and Northern Elephant seals almost "Clones"
Founder Effect: • Genetic drift in a new colony • May be only one gravid female • Sampling error can result in "instant" evolution • Very much like a bottleneck • Extreme sampling error possible
Examples • Tristan da Cunha (Classic Example) • Founded by a small number of colonists (15) • Retinitis Pigmentosa (one founder was a carrier) • Amish in PA • Founded by 200 people • 1-2 founders have Ellis-van Creveldsyndrom • Frequency 0.07 in Amish, 0.001 in the population as a whole
Village of Salinas:In the remote mountains of the Dominican Republic:
One village founder Altagracia Carrasco • Several children with at least 4 women • Large contribution to a small population
Mutant for 5-alpha reductase-2 gene • Low catalytic activity • He was a heterozygote • Enzyme responsible for conversion of testosterone to DHT • Required for full masculinization of external genitalia • Results in XY “females”
What happens at puberty? • Guevedoces (penis at twelve)
Effective Population Size: • Theoretical "ideal" population having the same magnitude of drift as the "Real"(tm) population • Census size: • All the individuals in a population • Assume No selection, No migration, No mutation, Non overlapping generations, Diploid, Sexual • No population obeys the rules so we need a "fudge factor" • Effective population size almost always smaller than the census size
Example: • Assume 500 individuals • 250 breeding age • Only 5 "dominant" males breed • EPS = 130
Drift and selection: • Can allow selection to act • "C" allele again!