290 likes | 316 Views
Explore the historical, governmental, and ideological factors influencing the Great Irish Famine of 1845-51. Understand the expectations and actions of the government and the impact of policies on mass mortality and the Irish society.
E N D
Government Relief Policy and the Great Irish Famine1845-51 Prof Peter Gray Queen’s University Belfast
Key questions • What was the governing context? Britain and Ireland in 1845 • What could government have done? • What expectations were there of government action? • What did government do? • What role did ideology play in shaping policy? • What evidence is there for ‘genocide’? • What responsibility did the state play for mass mortality?
Governing Context • A colonial context? A hybrid constitutional position • From 1801 Ireland part of UK unitary state in theory • Ireland represented in Westminster Parliament – 105 MPs and 32 peers • Since 1829 Catholics admitted to Parliament; but property qualifications for vote and seats • Separate executive for Ireland at Dublin Castle under Lord Lieutenant, Chief Secretary and Under-Secretary • Separate legislation and legal structure for Ireland • Nationalist movement (Repeal) active under Daniel O’Connell from 1830
What could government have done? • Contrast government action in 1740-1 and 1845-50 • Developing financial power of state, bureaucratic organisation and reach of state agencies: - Commissariat (1809) - Census of Ireland (1821) / Ordnance Survey (1824) - Irish Board of Works (1831) / National Education Board (1831) - Irish Constabulary (1836) - Irish Poor Law (1838) / Dispensaries and fever hospital network • But no separate Irish Treasury: financial power in London
Expectations of state action • Little expectation of central state intervention in 18th century • Government intervention in crises from 1816-17 creates expectations • Robert Peel’s experience as CSI 1816-17, Home Secretary 1822 • Whig experience of regional crises 1831, 1835, 1839 • Small-scale intervention in west to keep down prices, provide employment • Relief directed from Dublin Castle • Debate about relationship between poor law to relief
Areas of possible state intervention • Food availability / price - export/import policy - price control policy (2) Employment - public employment (3) Direct aid - food rationing - provision of shelter - provision of medical aid (4) Assisted emigration Soup ration tickets, 1847
Peel’s government (1841-July 1846) • Conservative Party administration 1841-6 • Faces limited crisis of 1845-6 • Experienced in dealing with Irish famine • Anxious not to concede political ground to Daniel O’Connell • Response to Irish crisis interconnected with repeal of UK Corn Laws • Political constraints: split in Conservative party early 1846 and denial of Irish crisis by ‘Protectionists’ • Charles Trevelyan (Assistant Secretary to Treasury, 1839-58 – civil servant) Sir Robert Peel (1788-1850)
Peel’s policy Organisation: Relief Commission established to co-ordinate response 1846, chaired by Sir Randolph Routh • Food policy • Secret purchase of £100,000 of maize from US • Lodged in Irish depots run by Army Commissariat for release to depress grain prices • No other interference with grain trade • Hoped repeal of Corn Laws 1846 would stimulate ‘natural’ trade in maize to Ireland
Food riot at Dungarvan, ILN, 1846 (2) Employment: • Public Works legislation 1846 allocates funds for employment on roads and drainage works • Terms were relatively favourable to Irish landowners; half of costs of road works granted in aid • Works put into operation spring 1846 under Irish Board of Works • Pressured by food riots and disturbances; Irish political pressure
(3) Direct aid: • Government prefers to co-operate with local ‘Relief Committees’ (c.650) of private individuals and clergy • Aids local subscriptions with grants in aid • Relief committees expected to buy grain and sell at cost price; & select persons deserving relief • Govt attempts to keep relief separate from poor law (fears of outdoor relief becoming permanent)
Success of Peel’s policy? • Relatively low excess mortality 1845-6 • Contains political or peasant insurgency backlash in Ireland • But calculated on basis of single year of famine; no contingency plan for 1846-7 • Provoked a political backlash in GB against ‘over-generosity’ to Irish landlords and peasants • Government falls end June 1846 on revolt against Irish Coercion Bill (Whig-Protectionist- O’Connellite alliance vs Peel) Punch on Peel’s Coercion Bill,Apr. 1846
Russell’s government (July 1846-52) • Whig-Liberal Party administration • Faces much more serious and prolonged crisis in Ireland 1846-51 • Has to deal with banking crash and recession in Great Britain, 1847-9; revolution in Europe 1848-9 • A minority government 1846-7; party divided after 1847 election – Radical revolt over taxes • Weak leadership from Lord John Russell (PM); factionalism in government • Charles Trevelyan (Asst Sec to Treasury – civil servant) 3 phases in relief policy: Lord John Russell (1792-1878)
Policy phase 1: Aug 1846-Mar 1847 Organisation: Drops Relief Commission; policy conflict between Dublin Castle and Treasury Food policy: • Abandons any new interference in food trade or pricing policy – minimal new purchases of grain • Residual use of remaining food depots in west until stocks run out • Reliance on ‘market forces’ for private imports of grain • Context of international shortages of grain 1846-7 (bad harvests and lack of imports) • Contributes to ‘hunger winter’ in Ireland 1846-7 • But has the role of food policy been exaggerated in causing famine? Charles Trevelyan (1807-86). Assistant Secretary to the Treasury
Irish grain exports/imports (000s of tons grain equivalent) - after Bourke (1976) exports . imports
. • Employment: • Revives public works employment under ‘Labour Rate Act’ August 1846 • Insists on greater Treasury control over works projects and reduces ‘grant in aid’ • Vetoes works of ‘permanent improvement’ • Sets public works wages below level for private employment; later adopts ‘piece work’ scale of payments to labourers • Introduces ‘half-day’ wages in harsh winter of 1846-7 when work impossible • Wages did not keep pace with food price increases • Over 700,000 workers on public works by March 1847 Board of Works tools, 1846
. (3) Direct relief: • Cuts grants in aid to relief committees • Numbers of inmates in workhouses rise – many full and turning people away by late 1846 • Emphasis on private charity – promoted by government (British Association) • Limited response to medical crisis (4) No assisted emigration or interference with Canadian passenger trade despite high mortality Relief Committee ticket for relief, c.1846 (NMI)
Policy phase 2: Apr-Sept 1847 Organisation: Relief Commission re-established under Sir John Burgoyne • Food policy: • No dramatic change, but food prices falling by early summer • US maize surplus reached Europe • Imports outstrip exports from late spring 1847 Gen. Sir John Burgoyne
. (2) Employment: • Public works rapidly phased out from March 1847 • Absence of private employment or other forms of relief in many areas • Some very limited state employment on railway and drainage schemes • Half of public works debt commuted to grant • Thousands left destitute during ‘transition’; some rioting against closure of works Proportion of population supported by public works March 1847
. (3) Direct relief: • Government follows Quakers in establishing extensive network of soup kitchens providing free rations under ‘Temporary Relief Act’ of Feb. 1847 • Lengthy bureaucratic and financial delays in setting up system – govt insists on local financial responsibility • At peak in July 1847 more than 3m daily rations doled out • Funded by loans; comes in under budget • Weak soup later replaced by ‘stirabout’ porridge • Minimum nutrition given, but has effect in lowering famine mortality in summer 1847 • Temporary fever act April 1847 allows for temporary hospitals
Soup Kitchens Soyer’s model soup kitchen, Dublin (ILN, 1847) % of population on soup rations, July 1847 Drawing of soup queue, 1847
Policy phase 3: Sept 1847-1851 Organisation: Relief Commission wound up; responsibility passed to Irish Poor Law Commission, Sept 1847 • Food policy: • All remaining food depots wound up by 1848 • Imports continue to outstrip exports; prices remain relatively low • But food distribution limited in west and many lack ability to consume what food is available • Employment: - Despite debates on new public works, no serious employment policy in 1848-51
. (3) Direct aid: • Soup kitchens wound up by Sept 1847 • Responsibility for relief placed on Poor Law (Poor Law Extension Act introduced Aug. 1847) • Some residual aid to ‘distressed unions’, but this was exhausted by mid-1848 • ‘Irish property must pay for Irish poverty’ • ‘Rate in Aid’ imposed on north and east, in spring 1849 – regional tax to pay for western distress (4) Assisted emigration: • Proposals 1848 and 1849 come to nothing • Only small-scale assistance to workhouse inmates to emigrate (Australian workhouse girls scheme) Notice of end of Soup Kitchen relief, Aug. 1847
Poor Law Irish workhouse plan (1839)
The Irish Poor Law • 1847-9 headed by Irish Chief Commissioner Edward Twisleton • 130 Unions each governed by part-elected Board of Guardians • Funded by rates on local property • Half of rates to be paid by landowner; also all for holdings valued under £4 pa • Quarter-acre clause of 1847 facilitates evictions • Crisis of union bankruptcy, workhouse overcrowding and disease in west • Corruption a significant problem in many unions late 1840s • Inspection regime fails to stop this • Twisleton resigns as Commissioner Mar. 1849 Londonderry Union workhouse (now museum) Dublin workhouse scene, c.1895
Failure of Russell’s policy • Mass famine mortality 1846-51 (c 1.1m excess deaths) • Failure to ensure adequate food supplies and equitable distribution to those who needed food • But capacity of state to act demonstrated under soup kitchen regime of summer 1847 • False belief that famine was ‘over’ by autumn 1847 • Withdrawal from state responsibility with reliance on locally-funded poor law relief only in 1847-51 • Failure to introduce ‘comprehensive measures’ (development works, emigration) to relieve pressure on the poor law Punch imagines the Famine over, 1847
Reasons for failure? 1. Constraints on government: • Scale of food crisis, especially in 1846-7 • International food shortage in 1846-7 • Political weakness in parliament and internal divisions within government • British recession 1847-9 and financial difficulties; growing public opposition to Irish aid • Problems of agency in Ireland (corruption, administrative inefficiency) • Lack of co-operation from local elites in Ireland
2. Ideology • No evidence for genocide (deliberate killing) • But considerable evidence of responsibility by omission and neglect. Shaped by: - Laissez-faire – reliance on market forces • Providentialism – belief that famine divinely- ordained for good • Moralism– concern to force the Irish (landlords and peasants) to help themselves • Racism? – evident in some press coverage; less so in government – but concern with English opinion • Pre-occupation with permanent ‘improvement’ over immediate aid: e.g. Encumbered Estates Act 1849
Punch, 1849 ‘Moralism’ represented in visual form.