1 / 24

High School Feedback Reports: Data for Success

Reports provide valuable insights for high schools and districts, balancing data reporting needs with student privacy protection. Enhancements planned for broader data inclusion.

ryanr
Download Presentation

High School Feedback Reports: Data for Success

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. High School Feedback Reports Tuesday, November 15, 2011 Katie Weaver Randall (WA) Kathy Gosa (KS) Christina Tydeman (HI)

  2. Katie Weaver Randall Washington Education Research & Data Center

  3. ESP-20 Spanning the Sectors

  4. Overview Overview of Reports - The purpose of producing the reports is twofold – provide useful information to high schools and school districts and help inform and support our P-20 data warehouse implementation. Surprises • Audience for reports extends beyond K-12 sector • Enthusiasm and interest Challenges One report doesn’t meet all needs – communicating purpose and utility Balancing reporting needs and protection of student privacy Communicating difference between P-20 and single sector perspective Next Steps Develop reports for legislative district Develop additional data displays, different aggregations of data, and tools so schools and districts can conduct meaningful comparisons. Incorporate stakeholder feedback into next iteration of reports Feedback reports for other sectors Reports available - http://www.erdcdata.wa.gov

  5. Kathy Gosa Kansas State Department of Education

  6. Background • HSFB Reports are a “byproduct” of SFSF C(11) and C(12) metrics. • Provided by KSDE and accessed via the existing authenticated BI solution for school and district administrators. • Customizable view based on parameter selection • Presents charts and data • Exportable as Excel, PDF • Initial design / content based on • research of what other states are doing • available data

  7. Data Sources In Progress • SAT / AP Potential / Planned • Dept of Labor • Dept of Defense? Current • KSDE SLDS • Kansas Board of Regents • National Student Clearinghouse • ACT

  8. High School Feedback

  9. Kansas HSFB Dashboards Postsecondary Enrollment Rates - lists the percentage of high school graduates who enrolled in a postsecondary institution by building, grouped by high school graduation year with comparative values for district, state, and national averages. Parameter selections for Time Elapsed until Enrollment in Postsecondary, Student Subgroup, Postsecondary Institution Location, and Institution Type. ACT Scores – shows the average ACT scores by building with comparative values for district, state, and national averages. Parameter selections for Student Subgroup, ACT Subject Area, and Postsecondary Enrollment are available.

  10. Kansas HSFB Dashboards Postsecondary Retention Metrics - lists the percentage of high school graduates by building who enrolled in a public postsecondary institution in Kansas, grouped by high school graduation year, with comparative values for district and state averages Parameters include Student Subgroup, and High School Graduation Year Postsecondary Enrollment Locations - lists by relative frequency, IHEs where high school graduates enroll for postsecondary education, grouped by high school graduation year. Parameters include building and HS graduation year.

  11. Kansas HSFB Dashboards Postsecondary Remedial Coursework - lists the percentage of high school graduates enrolled in a public postsecondary institution in Kansas who enrolled in remedial coursework, with comparative values for district and state averages. As second dashboard lists the percentage of students who passed the remedial coursework. Parameters include Student Subgroup and High School Graduation Year.

  12. Planned / Potential Enhancements • Acquisition and Inclusion of SAT data (In Progress) • Acquisition and Inclusion of Department of Labor (DOL) data – (Career Readiness Metrics) • Inclusion of High School Course data (SCRS) • Construction of Cross Indicator/Predictive Analytics • Inclusion of Postsecondary Completion Metrics (In Progress) • Inclusion of State Assessment data • Acquisition and Inclusion of Advanced Placement data (In Progress) • Acquisition and Inclusion of Department of Defense (DOD) data (Career Readiness)

  13. Christina Tydeman Hawaii Department of Education

  14. Career and College Readiness Indicator Reports Christina Tydeman, PhDData Governance DirectorHawaii Department of Education808-586-3228christina_tydeman@notes.k12.hi.us

  15. Background Developed by Hawaii P-20 Partnerships for Education • Hawaii Department of Education • University of Hawaii How well are Hawaii graduates prepared to meet the HDOE’s Vision of a High School Graduate? Three annual reports: 2008, 2009, 2010

  16. Data Sources National Student Clearinghouse University of Hawaii System College Board Hawaii P-20 Partnerships for Education Hawaii Department of Education The full technical report is available at http://p20hawaii.org/indicators_report.html

  17. Selecting Indicators Availability • Currently being collected Accessibility • Readily available for all HDOE high schools Actionable • Impact on improving student readiness for the workforce or postsecondary education Additional measures to be added as available • School specific measures

  18. School Reported College and Career Indicators Opportunity for schools to report school-specific indicators Examples: Senior Exit Survey results • Self-reported by seniors during spring semester Military AVID

  19. Major Challenges Differences between self-reports by seniors and NSC data Non-participating universities/colleges Military • FEDES Overall differences in perceptions regarding what constitutes college readiness Strategically timing the release of the reports

  20. Page/Presentation Title Here Contact Info and Resources: Katie Weaver Randall, Katie.Weaver-Randall@OFM.WA.GOV Kathy Gosa, kgosa@ksde.org Christina Tydeman, christina_tydeman@notes.k12.hi.us To Request SST Support: Fill out a TA Request Form on GRADS

More Related