680 likes | 969 Views
TESOL Dallas March 2013 . Academic Vocabulary What is it and how can it be incorporated into a language teaching program?. Diane Schmitt . Vocabulary has traditionally been divided into four main types:. General Academic Technical Low Frequency (Nation, 2001). General Vocabulary.
E N D
TESOL Dallas March 2013 Academic VocabularyWhat is it and how can it be incorporated into a language teaching program? Diane Schmitt
Vocabulary has traditionally been divided into four main types: • General • Academic • Technical • Low Frequency (Nation, 2001)
General Vocabulary • the 2000 most frequent words of English • provide 80% coverage of most texts arrive, discuss, follower, impossible, leader, message, repeat, story
Academic Vocabulary • a list of 570 frequently occurring words in academic texts • provides approximately 8-12% coverage of academic texts attribute, category, environment, function, internal, monitor, perspective, widespread
Technical Vocabulary • words that occur with very high or moderate frequency level within a limited range of texts • provides 5% coverage of most texts audit, capital, distribution, metrics, principal agent, shareholder, supply
Low Frequency Vocabulary • words at the 2,000 - 20,000 frequency level and beyond • provides 5% coverage of most texts abject, credentials, genealogy, geomorphic, incarcerate, palpitate, rupture
Relevance for teaching EAP • Teach the most frequent 2000 words • Teach the AWL/sub-technical vocabulary, if students are going on to academic study • Teach the technical words of a subject after the first two sets of words have been learned • Or learners can/will learn technical words once they begin their subject studies or enter their field of work • Teach strategies for low-frequency words
It’s more complicated than that! • Challenges to the AWL • Alternative Definitions of Academic Vocabulary • Mutual Exclusivity of Vocabulary Categories • Lexical Validity
Challenges to the AWL (Hyland and Tse, 2007) • One word list cannot serve students of different disciplines equally well • Disciplines have their own preferred patterns of use for words – meaning sense, form, lexical and grammatical patterning • Homographs and word families distort the usefulness of the AWL and create an extra learning burden for no discernable gain • Vocabulary is not always acquired in the teaching sequence proposed by Nation
Critiques of the AWL • “[General academic word lists fail] to engage with current conceptions of literacy and EAP, ignore important differences in the collocational and semantic behavior of words, and do not correspond with the ways language is actually used in academic writing. [They] …could seriously mislead students.” (Hyland and Tse, 2007: 236-237)
Discipline specific behaviour of words Inflectional forms display distinctly different distributional profiles across disciplines (or sub-disciplines) (Ward, 2009) Different meaning senses will be differentially preferred across disciplines (Hyland and Tse, 2007) Collocational patterning differs from discipline to discipline. This affects word meaning. marketing strategy, learning strategy, coping strategy - Hyland and Tse, (2007) blueberry cell culture, cultures were grown - Martinez et al, (2009)
Discipline specific behaviour of words/or shared qualities(Granger and Paquot, 2010) Disciplinary differences for the use of analyze VESPA Corpus developed at CECL University of Louvain, Belgium Definitions of analyze from Hyland and Tse (2007) Hard Sciences–methods of determining the constituent parts or composition of a substance Social Sciences -consider something carefully
Discipline specific behaviour of words/or shared qualities(Granger and Paquot, 2010) Disciplinary similarities for the use of analyze VESPA Corpus developed at CECL University of Louvain, Belgium Core meaning –to examine data using specific methods or tools in order to make sense of it
Alternative definitions of academic vocabulary • Items which express notions shared by all or several specialised disciplines – factor, method • Items which have a specialised meaning in one or more disciplines – bug, solution • Items which are not used in general language but which have different meanings in several specialised disciplines - morphological • Items which are traditionally viewed as general language vocabulary but which have restricted meanings in certain specialised disciplines – “genes are expressed” • General language items which are used, in preference to other semantically equivalent items, to describe or comment on technical processes and functions – “digestion takes place”
Alternative definitions of academic vocabulary • Items which are used in specialised texts to perform specific rhetorical functions – explanation, pointed out (Baker, 1988) • Words that “have in common a focus on research, analysis and evaluation” (Martin, 1976) • Vocabulary that serves specific rhetorical and organisational functions in expert academic writing (Paquot, 2010)
Traditional vocabulary categories are not mutually exclusive • The GSL/2000 most frequent words of English tend to have multiple meaning senses. Some of which are academic/sub-technical or technical in nature • AWL vocabulary occurs outside of academic contexts • ‘Technicalness’ is a functional aspect of a word so words can only usefully be categorized in light of the context of use • Frequency is relative and depends on the size and specificity of a domain. Sub-technical and technical vocabulary may be ‘high frequency’ in a particular domain, but ‘low frequency’ in a general corpus • “Disciplines are lexically idiosyncratic” (Ward, 2009: 173)
Four step rating scale for identifying technical words (Chung and Nation, 2004) • Step 1 – Words such as function words that have no particular relationship with a field of study • amount, common, early • Step 2 – Words that have a meaning that is minimally related to a field of study • superior, supports, protects • Step 3 – Words that have a meaning closely related to the field of study, but which also occur in general language • abdomen, cavity, muscles • Step 4 – Words that have a meaning specific to a field and are not likely to be know in general language • thorax, periostuem, viscera
Coverage of technical words in specialized texts (Chung and Nation, 2003)
Coverage of technical words in specialized texts (Chung and Nation, 2003) GSL/AWL vocabulary
Development of ESP/EAP word lists • 2000 word Engineering list – Ward, (1999) – corpus of engineering textbooks – foundation level students • 1200 word Engineering list – Mudraya (2006) – corpus of basic engineering textbooks – university students • 623 word Medical AWL – Wang et al (2008) – corpus of research articles – for learners and users of English for Medical Purposes • 123 word Agricultural list – Martinez et al (2009) – corpus of research articles – experienced in discipline • 970 word Academic Keyword List – Paquot (2010) – general academic word list
Issues with word lists for specific purposes Level of specificity • Academic Study • Science and Technology • Discipline or Field - Engineering • Subject – Mechanical engineering • Occupational/Work • Airline Industry • Flight • Pilots, Air Traffic Controllers
Issues with word lists for specific purposes Learners in academic study • Level of existing knowledge of the field • Foundation, upper undergraduate, graduate • Immediate and long term goals • Current level of language proficiency • Acquisition patterns • Do ESP learners follow the norms of general English learners? “Our learners are clear examples of learners who acquire their English as they need it for their specific purpose…although they are usually unaware of even basic grammatical rules” (Martinez et al, 2009)
‘lexical validity’ (PTE Academic) • the extent to which the vocabulary occurring in, and elicited by, the test is representative of the vocabulary that test takers will encounter and be expected to produce, in real-world academic contexts. • “According to Paul Nation, authentic academic English texts typically contain at least 4% of AWL words. The results show that, according to this criterion, the test is academic in quality, both in respect of the language that it presents to test takers, and the language which it elicits.” http://www.pearsonpte.com/research/Documents/RS_InvestigatingLexicalValidityOfPTEAcademic_2010.pdf
Are these academic? B A C D
A sample essay prompt for students of media studies • How does the media influence the immigration debate? (asylum, refugees, migrant workers)
A sample essay prompt for students of media studies • How does the media influence the immigration debate? (asylum, refugees, migrant workers)
Purpose • The purpose for which a text is used (rather than for which it was originally written) will determine whether or not a text is “academic” or not • This will impact on which vocabulary words students will need to know (at least receptively)
What do we mean when we say something is academic? Fiction News/ Textbooks Journals Magazines EFL EAP Freshman Disciplinary Exams Writing Comp Writing
Relationship between vocabulary size and text coverage (Schmitt, Jiang & Grabe, 2011)
General guidance for independent use • Nation (2006) analyzed nine written and spoken corpora. He used the 98% figure to calculate vocabulary size requirements: • 6,000 - 7,000 word families for spokendiscourse • 8,000 - 9,000 word families for written discourse 95% coverage (Laufer and Ravenhorst-Kalovski,2004) • 4,000-5000 word families for written discourse Instructional Contexts
Vocabulary coverage for business texts (Hsu, 2011)
How much coverage do our categories provide? • High frequency + AWL + technical often ≠ 95%-98% coverage (Chung and Nation, 2003; Fraser 2005; Wang, Liang and Ge, 2008; Lessard-Clouston, 2010;)
Coverage of technical words in specialized texts (Chung and Nation, 2003) 96% coverage 88.2% coverage
Vocabulary size targets If language teachers/materials teach and use… • high frequency vocabulary: 2000 word families + • academic vocabulary: 570 word families Coverage shortfall • 6000 – 2570 ≈ 3500 word families listening • 8000 – 2570 ≈ 5500 word families reading
Considering the role of mid-frequency vocabulary (Schmitt and Schmitt, 2012) Hi-frequency Low frequency vocabulary vocabulary Mid-frequency 3,001 – 8,999 3,000 9,000 families families
Mid-frequency vocabulary • Words at the 3000-9000 frequency levels • provides 98% coverage of most texts Subsumes the AWL and much technical vocabulary
Words work together • “Technical vocabulary ‘is dependent for a full appreciation of its meaning on the meaning of the other terms in the cluster of which it is a member.’” (Godman and Payne, 1981:37 in Coxhead and Nation, 2001) • Academic discourse contains large amounts of deliberate definition. • Thus, it is important to ensure that learners recognize that definition is occurring and have mastery of the vocabulary used in the definitions.
What can learners do with any particular vocabulary size? • 250 words or fewer – read graded readers • 2-3,000 words - understand defining vocabulary of learner dictionaries • 2-3,000 words – participate in daily conversation • 3,000 – use TV and movies for teaching/learning • 5,000 words – read authentic texts w/assistance • 6-7,000 words – understand a wide range of oral discourse without assistance • 8-9,000 words – understand a wide range of written discourse NOT total vocabulary size, but mastery of each of these frequency bands
Grading learning materials • Control vocabulary at the lower levels to ensure that coverage levels for texts do not fall below 95% • Seed materials at middle and upper levels with mid-frequency vocabulary to ensure that there are enough recurrences for learning to take place
Academic Learning Materials Sample for Writing with Sources
Writing from sources begins with reading Reading Constructs • Reading for basic comprehension • recall • summarization • text-based multiple choice questions • Reading to learn – connecting new information with background knowledge • recognition of text structure • create a representation of content knowledge • Reading to integrate • link texts with regard to their individual text structure • link content knowledge from a single text with that from one or more texts (Trites and McGroarty, Language Testing, 2005)
Sample Task - Lying • Syllabus Goal: • Students will write an essay where they are required to incorporate information from source texts • Learning focus: • Students are not blank slates. Raise students’ awareness that they do hold views on academic topics. • Reading around a topic to gain new information and integrate it into existing knowledge/understanding base • Oral reporting and summarizing • Introduction and recycling of mid-frequency vocabulary • Fluency practice