1 / 17

Reforming Undergraduate STEM Education The AAU Initiative

Reforming Undergraduate STEM Education The AAU Initiative. Tobin Smith AAU Vice President for Policy NSF S-STEM Projects Meeting Crystal Gateway Marriott, Arlington, Virginia October 16, 2012.

sabin
Download Presentation

Reforming Undergraduate STEM Education The AAU Initiative

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reforming Undergraduate STEM Education The AAU Initiative Tobin Smith AAU Vice President for Policy NSF S-STEM Projects Meeting Crystal Gateway Marriott, Arlington, Virginia October 16, 2012

  2. - Boyer Commission Report, 1998 “Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America’s Research Universities” - Undergraduate Research Pilot Study, 2001 - Standards for Success, 2003 “Understanding University Success" - Informal Survey of STEM Retention Programs at AAU Universities, 2010 - AAU Undergraduate STEM Initiative, 2011 AAU & its History in STEM Education

  3. President’s Council of Advisors on Science & Technology (PCAST): Engage to Excel Report • National Research Council (NRC): Discipline-Based Education Research Report Recent Reports

  4. The goal of the AAU Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative is to help influence change in the culture of STEM departments at AAU universities so that they will use evidence-based, student-centered, active, sustainable pedagogy in their classes, particularly at the freshman and sophomore levels. Mission Statement

  5. Workforce needs → Competitiveness • Desire for a scientifically-literate population • New scholarship on what works in the classroom: evidence-based teaching methods • Several AAU institutions are already at the forefront of improving STEM undergraduate education Rationale

  6. STEM completion rates not good • Research universities don’t produce as many STEM majors as other colleges and universities • Evidence-based teaching methods are not widely adopted. Why? • Teaching (and learning) are not effectively evaluated and rewarded Problems

  7. Framework (Goal #1) • Demonstration Projects (Goal #2) • Incentives (Goals #3 and #4) • Promising Practices (Goal #5) Key Components

  8. What is the Framework? A menu of evidence-based practices that can be used to improve STEM teaching and to measure these improvements. Core Component  Pedagogy Who will use it? The framework is designed to be used by several different stakeholders including: • Faculty • Administrators • Departments • Institutions How will it be used? The framework is usable along several dimensions: • To improve teaching and learning in the classroom • To coordinate courses within the department • To determine how broadly evidence-based techniques are being used Framework [Goal #1]

  9. Out with the old…

  10. In with the new…

  11. A subset of AAU institutions will be identified to serve as demonstration sites that will implement the framework. Activities will include implementing practices to: • Improve the quality of teaching and learning in STEM classes • Determine if and how evidence-based teaching methods are being used • Measure the effects of using improved teaching methods on STEM and Non-STEM majors Vs. Demonstration Projects [Goal #2]

  12. Presidents/Chancellors must make a public commitment to serving as a demonstration site. • Institutions must contribute substantial resources to the demonstration project and provide a plan for sustainability. • Institutions must include at least 3 departments with some rational connection within their demonstration projects. • Respected senior faculty within participating departments must be engaged. • Institutions must include assessment within their demonstration projects. Preliminary Demonstration Site Criteria

  13. Federal Institutional • Work with federal agencies on mechanisms to encourage good teaching Explore institutional and departmental incentives for good teaching Including: • Working with Cottrell Scholars, HHMI professors and others on identifying and disseminating promising practices for evaluating teaching in promotion and tenure PULSE Partnership for Undergraduate Life Science Education Incentives [Goals #3 and#4]

  14. To develop effective means for sharing information about promising & effective undergraduate STEM programs, approaches, and methods. Key Projects • Promising Practices Resource Booklet& Workshop • Program Evaluation Techniques Promising Practices [Goal #5]

  15. Course Content/ • Curriculum • Recruitment/Retention of Women and URM • Graduate Student Training • Pedagogy • Faculty Development • Future Faculty Development (graduate student training) • Institutional/State/Federal Policy • Course content/curriculum • K-12 Teacher Development • Workforce Development • Recruitment/retention of underrepresented student populations in STEM (including women and minorities) • Undergraduate STEM Education Reform Areas of STEM Reform

  16. Association of Public Land-grant Universities (APLU) • K-12 Teacher Development • Business Higher-Education Forum (BHEF) • Workforce Development • Project Kaleidoscope (PKAL) • Faculty Development and Policy • Association of American Universities (AAU) • Pedagogy • Disciplinary Societies • Faculty development and curriculum • Many others… Organizations Addressing These Areas of Need:

  17. Thank you Tobin Smith Vice President for Policy Association of American Universities toby_smith@aau.edu Phone: 202-408-7500 Website: www.aau.edu

More Related