1 / 25

A Firm-Based Freight Demand Modeling Framework:

A Firm-Based Freight Demand Modeling Framework:. Capturing Intra-firm Interaction and Joint Logistic Decision Making. Qi Gong and Jessica Guo, PhD. Transportation and Urban Systems Analysis Lab Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin – Madison. Outline. Introduction

sabine
Download Presentation

A Firm-Based Freight Demand Modeling Framework:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Firm-Based Freight Demand Modeling Framework: Capturing Intra-firm Interaction and Joint Logistic Decision Making Qi Gong and Jessica Guo, PhD. Transportation and Urban Systems Analysis Lab Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin – Madison

  2. Outline • Introduction • Study objectives • Logistics management framework • Intra-firm interaction • Modeling framework • Conclusion

  3. Introduction • Freight transportation as derived demand • Need to incorporate supply chain concepts in freight demand models • Limitation shared by existing supply-chain based models: • Business establishments are treated as separate and independent decision-making agents • Inter-establishment interactions considered only between agents of different roles in the supply chain • Interactions among establishments within a firm not accounted for

  4. Introduction • Prevalence and implication of multi-establishment firms on freight movement Source: Statistics of Small Business, 2007

  5. Current Study Objectives • Objectives: • To capture the philosophies in logistics management • To better represent the decision-making paradigms of establishments and firms • This study proposes a firm-based freight demand modeling framework: • Incorporates supply chain concepts • Accounts for the interdependency of establishments within a firm

  6. Logistics Management Framework • Freight transportation demand is derived from business logistics management needs • Freight patterns are determined from various business operation and logistics decisions falling within different planning areas

  7. Logistics Management Framework Transportation • Vehicle routing and scheduling (O) • Carrier selection (S) • Mode choice (T) Logistics Planning Area Facility Structure and Location • Business Economic Activity Boundary (S) • Facility number (S) • Facility size (S) • Facility location (S) Key Decisions (Planning Level) Decision Making Principles • Optimization of capital and transportation cost • Spatial interaction Customer Demand and Service Purchasing Inventory • Customer service level (S) • Inventory level (S) • Make-or-Buy (S) • Supplier selection (S) • Sourcing points (T) • Purchasing quantities (T) • Just-in-time/forward buying (S) • Inventory deployment (S) • Replenishment quantity (T) • Replenishment frequency (T) • Profit maximization • Kanban system/MRP • Push/pull approach • Economic order quantity • Reorder point model • Periodic review model • Transaction cost theory • Auction sourcing • Optimization for sourcing points • Carrier requirements minimization • Traveling salesman • Inventory routing (S): Strategic decision (T): Tactical decision (O): Operational decision

  8. Logistics Management Framework Transportation • Vehicle routing and scheduling (O) • Carrier selection (S) • Mode choice (T) Logistics Planning Area Facility Structure and Location • Business Economic Activity Boundary (S) • Facility number (S) • Facility size (S) • Facility location (S) Key Decisions (Planning Level) Decision Making Principles • Optimization of capital and transportation cost • Spatial interaction Customer Demand and Service Purchasing Inventory • Customer service level (S) • Inventory level (S) • Make-or-Buy (S) • Supplier selection (S) • Sourcing points (T) • Purchasing quantities (T) • Just-in-time/forward buying (S) • Inventory deployment (S) • Replenishment quantity (T) • Replenishment frequency (T) • Profit maximization • Kanban system/MRP • Push/pull approach • Economic order quantity • Reorder point model • Periodic review model • Transaction cost theory • Auction sourcing • Optimization for sourcing points • Carrier requirements minimization • Traveling salesman • Inventory routing (S): Strategic decision (T): Tactical decision (O): Operational decision

  9. Logistics Management Framework Transportation • Vehicle routing and scheduling (O) • Carrier selection (S) • Mode choice (T) Logistics Planning Area Facility Structure and Location • Business Economic Activity Boundary (S) • Facility number (S) • Facility size (S) • Facility location (S) Key Decisions (Planning Level) Decision Making Principles • Optimization of capital and transportation cost • Spatial interaction Customer Demand and Service Purchasing Inventory • Customer service level (S) • Inventory level (S) • Make-or-Buy (S) • Supplier selection (S) • Sourcing points (T) • Purchasing quantities (T) • Just-in-time/forward buying (S) • Inventory deployment (S) • Replenishment quantity (T) • Replenishment frequency (T) • Profit maximization • Kanban system/MRP • Push/pull approach • Economic order quantity • Reorder point model • Periodic review model • Transaction cost theory • Auction sourcing • Optimization for sourcing points • Carrier requirements minimization • Traveling salesman • Inventory routing (S): Strategic decision (T): Tactical decision (O): Operational decision

  10. Logistics Management Framework Transportation • Vehicle routing and scheduling (O) • Carrier selection (S) • Mode choice (T) Logistics Planning Area Facility Structure and Location • Business Economic Activity Boundary (S) • Facility number (S) • Facility size (S) • Facility location (S) Key Decisions (Planning Level) Decision Making Principles • Optimization of capital and transportation cost • Spatial interaction Customer Demand and Service Purchasing Inventory • Customer service level (S) • Inventory level (S) • Make-or-Buy (S) • Supplier selection (S) • Sourcing points (T) • Purchasing quantities (T) • Just-in-time/forward buying (S) • Inventory deployment (S) • Replenishment quantity (T) • Replenishment frequency (T) • Profit maximization • Kanban system/MRP • Push/pull approach • Economic order quantity • Reorder point model • Periodic review model • Transaction cost theory • Auction sourcing • Optimization for sourcing points • Carrier requirements minimization • Traveling salesman • Inventory routing (S): Strategic decision (T): Tactical decision (O): Operational decision

  11. Logistics Management Framework Transportation • Vehicle routing and scheduling (O) • Carrier selection (S) • Mode choice (T) Logistics Planning Area Facility Structure and Location • Business Economic Activity Boundary (S) • Facility number (S) • Facility size (S) • Facility location (S) Key Decisions (Planning Level) Decision Making Principles • Optimization of capital and transportation cost • Spatial interaction Customer Demand and Service Purchasing Inventory • Customer service level (S) • Inventory level (S) • Make-or-Buy (S) • Supplier selection (S) • Sourcing points (T) • Purchasing quantities (T) • Just-in-time/forward buying (S) • Inventory deployment (S) • Replenishment quantity (T) • Replenishment frequency (T) • Profit maximization • Kanban system/MRP • Push/pull approach • Economic order quantity • Reorder point model • Periodic review model • Transaction cost theory • Auction sourcing • Optimization for sourcing points • Carrier requirements minimization • Traveling salesman • Inventory routing (S): Strategic decision (T): Tactical decision (O): Operational decision

  12. Logistics Management Framework Transportation • Vehicle routing and scheduling (O) • Carrier selection (S) • Mode choice (T) Logistics Planning Area Facility Structure and Location • Business Economic Activity Boundary (S) • Facility number (S) • Facility size (S) • Facility location (S) Key Decisions (Planning Level) Decision Making Principles • Optimization of capital and transportation cost • Spatial interaction Customer Demand and Service Purchasing Inventory • Customer service level (S) • Inventory level (S) • Make-or-Buy (S) • Supplier selection (S) • Sourcing points (T) • Purchasing quantities (T) • Just-in-time/forward buying (S) • Inventory deployment (S) • Replenishment quantity (T) • Replenishment frequency (T) • Profit maximization • Kanban system/MRP • Push/pull approach • Economic order quantity • Reorder point model • Periodic review model • Transaction cost theory • Auction sourcing • Optimization for sourcing points • Carrier requirements minimization • Traveling salesman • Inventory routing (S): Strategic decision (T): Tactical decision (O): Operational decision

  13. Intra-Firm Interaction • Facility Structure and Location • In the wholesale/retail industry, consumer demand is the key determinant driving the location of retail outlets. The location decision is also affected by • cannibalization and; • market expansion • In the manufacturing industry, facility structure and location decisions depend largely on the production scheme adopted by a firm • product plant strategy • market area plant strategy • process plant strategy • general purpose plant strategy

  14. Intra-Firm Interaction Firm i Plant i1 Firm i Plant Supplier Firm a Supplier Firm a Firm i Plant i2 Supplier Firm b Supplier Firm b Firm j Plant Scenario A: Supplier selection of single-plant firm Scenario B: Centralized purchasing of multi-establishment firm • Purchasing • Centralized purchasing strategy (e.g., adopted by Whirlpool, General Motors, Dells, Wal-Mart and IBM) • Decentralized purchasing • Centralized pricing with decentralized purchasing • Supplier selection for centralized purchasing scenario

  15. Intra-Firm Interaction Firm i Plant 1 Firm a Supplier i Firm i Warehouse Firm i Plant 3 Firm c Firm i Plant 2 Firm b Scenario B: Push approach by multi-establishment firm Scenario A: Pull approach by single-establishment firms • Inventory • Push/Pull approach • Vendor-managed inventory (VMI) • Inventory replenishment behavior

  16. Intra-Firm Interaction • Transportation • A firm owning multiple establishments has more opportunities of vehicle consolidation during goods movements • The combined shipment size may also make a mode such as rail more attractive

  17. Modeling Framework • A hybrid of longitudinal and latitudinal simulation

  18. Modeling Framework • Four major modules: Firm Creation Purchasing Inventory & Ordering Transportation

  19. Firm Creation • Creates a collection of firms and member establishments located within the study region • Accounts for the effects of production scheme • Analysis unit: • A firm and all its member establishments

  20. Purchasing • Determines annual amounts of commodities to be moved between all pairs of establishments • Assumes centralized purchasing strategy • Considers the possibility of using in-house sources

  21. Inventory and Ordering • Determines the order quantity happened on an average day throughout a year • Based on the economic order quantity theory widely adopted in logistics management

  22. Transportation • Assigns shipments with modes, consolidation location, vehicles, and routes • Follows the transport chain concept developed by de Jong and Ben-Akiva (2007)

  23. Conclusion • The intra-firm interdependency in logistics decision-making is captured in the proposed framework • Explicitly represent firm-establishment structures • Consider possibility of internal sourcing within a firm • Apply the popular strategy of centralized purchasing • Consider joint ordering across establishments of the same firm • Part of this modeling system has been calibrated using readily available public data

  24. Conclusion • Remaining models to be estimated using data from ongoing firm-based surveys in Wisconsin • Limitations resulted from certain simplifications and assumptions that are incorporated in framework to assure its operational ability: • The ignorance of horizontal alliance across single-establishment firms • Implicit consideration of price policy • A constant demand pattern assumed for the modeling of ordering behavior

  25. Thank You

More Related