210 likes | 336 Views
Review and developments. Course review FAQs Development How did we address your needs?. Airworthiness codes. ATM Safety codes. Airport Safety codes. Flight Operations Certification codes.
E N D
Course review • FAQs • Development • How did we address your needs?
Airworthiness codes ATM Safety codes Airport Safety codes Flight Operations Certification codes ToTal System Approach For a consistent set of requirements to be developed and collected across aviation codes ICAO Annex 11 and associated doc ICAO Annex 8 and associated doc ICAO Annex 14 and associated doc ICAO Annex 6 and associated doc
ToTal System Approach For a consistent set of requirements to be developed and collected across all parts of the system
Operational environmentboundary The ATM system and supporting services (THE TOTAL SYSTEM APPROACH) CNS/ATM systemboundary ATSU Aircraft People Flight Operations procedures ATC Procedures Pilot training Ground Equipment Aircraft equipment Airspace CNS/ATM Procedures
ToTal System Approach For a consistent set of requirements to be implemented across national boundaries
Relative Minima Absolute Minima ECAC Safety Minimum-ATM Absolute Number 0,623 4,38 10-8 Progressive Increase (6,7% per year ) 1,55 10-8 1999 Year 2015
Work done so far SEVERITY OFEFFECTS ON AIRCRAFTOPERATIONS PROBABILITY OFTHE HAZARDLEADING TO ACCIDENT/INCIDENT PROBABILITY OFOCCURRENCE OFTHE HAZARD SAFETYOBJECTIVE ? ? ? ? LIMITATIONS…. ESARR2 collection MAXIMUM PROBABILITYOF OCCURRENCE OF HAZARD FAILURE HAZARD INCIDENTOR ACCIDENT SRC POL DOC 1 ECAC ATM Safety Minima SEVERITY OF EFFECTSINDUCED BY THE HAZARD CLASS 1Accidents CLASS 2SeriousIncidents CLASS 3MajorIncidents CLASS 4SignificantIncidents CLASS 5No ImmediateEffect on Safety 1,55x10-8 ?? ?? ?? MAXIMUM PROBABILITYOF OCCURRENCE OF HAZARD EFFECTS
Once tolerable risks have been agreed... LIFECYCLE ASSURANCE FHA How safe does the system need to be, to achieve tolerable risk? System Definition PSSA System Design Is the proposed design able to achieve tolerable risk? System Implementation SSA Integration Does the system achieve tolerable risk? Operation
Or we can define a tolerable rate of occurrence for each severity in a table.
Or we can turn this into what is called the pyramid graph Severity Rate of occurrence
Determine requirements Coordinated Requirements Determination ATS provider safety requirements Aircraft safety requirements Aircraft Operations safety requireemtns ATS provider operational approval Aircraft type design approval Operator operational approval Entry into Service (Coordinated) Planning, Development & Qualification Monitor system Operations
Initiation and update of safety arguments must be undertaken according to the stages of life cycle Safety Argument collects evidence that safety is maintained during all stages of life cycle Planning Design Implementation Integration Transfer to Operation Operations and Maintenance Decommissioning
Boundaries, scope and interfaces of system Risk Mitigation strategy Safety Requirements • And finally to document everything! Environment of operations System Safety Objectives Safety requirements allocated to domain Identify system hazards Safety requirement verification Apportionment Identify ATM hazards Safety requirement validation Tolerability Severity classification Safety Monitoring requirements
FAQs See http://www.eurocontrol.int/src/index.html then ‘src deliverables’ then ‘ESARR 4’ then ‘safety awareness package on ESARR 4’
ESARR 4 development This is just the beginning!!!!
The first holes? • Where are the numbers for the maximum tolerable probability for severity categories 2 through 5? • How do we apportion? • How do I regulate this? • Is it ICAO compliant?
Existing development • Development • Apportionment EAM 4 GUI 3 • Guidance • on rational EAM 4 GUI 1 • on safety oversight EAM 4 GUI 2 • ICAO compliance SRC DOC 19 • Setting national maximum tolerability of hazard severity 2 - 5 SRC DOC 15 • Ask to attend the groups developing the material
Future development • ESARR Implementation support and monitoring
HELP!! • Regulators can approach the SRU for support through their SRC commissioner. • ANSP can approach the Support To State unit of EUROCONTROL. Kenneth.EIDEBERG@eurocontrol.int • For interpretations contact the focal point in SRU gary.morton@eurocontrol.int • For latest documents see the web site! • Http://www.eurocontrol.int/sru