530 likes | 703 Views
TRENDS AND BENCHMARKS. Michigan State University. Summer 2005. TABLE OF CONTENTS. TRENDS 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS 3. TABLE OF CONTENTS PEER INSTITUTIONS 4. PUBLIC BIG TEN 4. PUBLIC LAND-GRANT AAU PREPARATION/CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS 6. PREPARATION OF ENTERING CLASS
E N D
TRENDSANDBENCHMARKS Michigan State University Summer 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS TRENDS 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS 3. TABLE OF CONTENTS PEER INSTITUTIONS 4. PUBLIC BIG TEN 4. PUBLIC LAND-GRANT AAU PREPARATION/CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS 6. PREPARATION OF ENTERING CLASS 7. ENTERING CLASS HIGH SCHOOL STANDING 8. ENTERING CLASS ADMISSIONS STATISTICS 9. ENTERING CLASS PROFILE 10. ENTERING CLASS PROFILE 11. UNDERGRADUATE PROFILE 12. UNDERGRADUATE PROFILE 13. GRADUATE STUDENT PROFILE 14. GRADUATE STUDENT PROFILE 15. GRADUATE PROFESSIONAL PROFILE 16. GRADUATE PROFESSIONAL PROFILE 17. TOTAL STUDENT PROFILE 19. TOTAL STUDENT HEADCOUNT 20. TOTAL STUDENT HEADCOUNT FINANCIAL AID 21. TUITION AND SCHOLARSHIPS 22. TUITION AND SCHOLARSHIPS SECTION SIZE 23. SECTION SIZE RETENTION AND GRADUATION RATES 24. SIX YEAR GRADUATION RATE 25. FIRST YEAR RETENTION DEGREE PROFILE 26. DEGREES 27. DEGREES RESEARCH ACTIVITY 28. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 29. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 30. FACULTY RESEARCH DOLLARS 31. RESEARCH LAB SPACE
TABLE OF CONTENTS RESEARCH ACTIVITY (CONTINUED) 32. RESEARCH LAB SPACE 33. RESEARCH LIBRARY RANKING FUND RAISING 34. LICENSING REVENUES & PATENT ACTIVITY 35. LICENSING REVENUES & PATENT ACTIVITY 36. FUND RAISING 37. FUND RAISING TYPES OF EMPLOYEES – FACULTY, GRAD ASSISTANTS & SUPPORT STAFF 38. FACULTY COMPOSITION BY APPOINTMENT 39. FACULTY COMPOSITION BY GENDER & ETHNICITY 40. FACULTY COMPOSITION BY GENDER & ETHNICITY 41. FACULTY COMPOSITION 42. GRADUATE ASSISTANTS 43. GRADUATE ASSISTANTS 44. GRADUATE ASSISTANT COMPENSATION 45. GRADUATE ASSISTANT COMPENSATION 46. SUPPORT STAFF MISSION BASED EXPENDITURES TO SUPPORT ACTIVITIES 47. EXPENDITURES BY MISSION COMPONENT 48. EXPENDITURES BY MISSION COMPONENT 49. ACADEMIC SUPPORT PER FTE STUDENT 50. PHYSICAL PLANT EXPENDITURES EXTERNAL RANKINGS 51. EXTERNAL RANKINGS (INC. STUDENT FAC RATIO) 52. EXTERNAL RANKINGS (INC. STUDENT FAC RATIO)
PUBLIC BIG TEN INSTITUTIONS University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Indiana University-Bloomington University of Iowa University of Michigan-Ann Arbor Michigan State University University of Minnesota-Twin Cities Ohio State University Pennsylvania State University Purdue University University of Wisconsin-Madison
PUBLIC LANDGRANT AAU INSTITUTIONS University of Arizona University of CaliforniaRepresentative Median: Berkeley Davis Irvine Los Angeles San Diego Santa Barbara University of Florida University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Iowa State University University of Maryland-College Park Michigan State University University of Minnesota-Twin Cities University of Missouri-Columbia University of Nebraska at Lincoln Ohio State University Pennsylvania State University Purdue University Rutgers University-New Brunswick Texas A & M University University of Wisconsin-Madison
MSUTrend MSUTrend PREPARATION BIG TEN MSU Low Median High High School GPA ACT Composite 25% ACT Composite 75% 3.6 22 27 3.5 22 27 3.6 23 28 3.7 26 31 Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High High School GPA ACT Composite 25% ACT Composite 75% 3.6 22 27 3.3 21 26 3.7 23 28 3.9 26 31 Big Ten and AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for class entering Fall 2003.
HIGH SCHOOL STANDING MSUTrend MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Freshmen Top 10% Freshmen Top 25% 28% 67% 21% 48% 33% 71% 90% 98% Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Freshmen Top 10% Freshmen Top 25% 28% 67% 24% 53% 39% 79% 97% 100% Big Ten and AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for class entering Fall 2003.
ADMISSIONS STATISTICS MSUTrend MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High % Admit Ratio* % Yield Ratio* 79.4% 42.5% 62.5% 34.8% 75.6% 40.8% 83.2% 49.3% Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High 47.4% 23.6% % Admit Ratio* % Yield Ratio* 79.4% 42.5% 73.9% 45.1% 90.2% 63.8% *Calculations use IPEDS data. Big Ten and AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for class entering Fall 2004.
ENTERING CLASSPROFILE MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Total First-Time Students % Minority % International % Female % Full Time % First-Time UG Resident 7,607 17.1% 2.5% 54.8% 97.6% 91.4% 4,017 8.6% 0.7% 41.1% 99.1% 45.2% 6,037 14.0% 2.5% 50.5% 99.5% 67.0% 7,237 25.9% 5.1% 56.0% 99.9% 92.8% Big Ten figures do not include MSU. Data for class entering Fall 2004.
ENTERING CLASSPROFILE MSUTrend Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Total First-Time Students % Minority % International % Female % Full Time % First-Time UG Resident 7,607 17.1% 2.5% 54.8% 97.6% 91.4% 3,266 8.4% 0.6% 41.1% 94.5% 36.5% 5,641 18.3% 1.5% 50.4% 99.5% 79.3% 7,237 57.6% 3.9% 57.0% 99.9% 96.6% AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for class entering Fall 2004.
UNDERGRADUATE PROFILE MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Undergraduates Minority International Female 79.0% 17.2% 3.2% 53.1% 62.8% 8.6% 1.7% 40.2% 72.8% 13.1% 4.0% 50.8% 84.3% 26.0% 6.1% 54.1% Big Ten figures do not include MSU. Data for Fall 2004.
UNDERGRADUATE PROFILE MSUTrend Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Undergraduates Minority International Female 79.0% 17.2% 3.2% 53.1% 64.2% 7.4% 1.1% 40.2% 77.3% 16.0% 2.8% 49.2% 84.3% 54.5% 6.1% 54.7% AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Fall 2004.
GRADUATE STUDENT PROFILE MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Graduate Students Minority International Female 17.9% 12.6% 26.8% 55.8% 15.7% 8.3% 19.8% 37.4% 21.7% 9.1% 27.0% 49.0% 30.8% 19.6% 42.4% 54.1% Big Ten figures do not include MSU. Data for Fall 2004.
GRADUATE STUDENT PROFILE MSUTrend Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Graduate Students Minority International Female 17.9% 12.6% 26.8% 55.8% 15.7% 5.5% 19.8% 37.4% 20.0% 10.6% 25.0% 48.6% 28.6% 23.0% 42.4% 62.6% AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Fall 2004.
GRADUATE PROFESSIONAL PROFILE MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Graduate Professionals Minority International Female 3.1% 19.6% 0.9% 63.2% 2.3% 9.6% 1.3% 46.0% 6.2% 14.8% 1.8% 53.4% 7.5% 31.1% 3.7% 69.7% Big Ten figures do not include MSU. Data for Fall 2004.
GRADUATE PROFESSIONAL PROFILE MSUTrend Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Graduate Professionals Minority International Female 3.1% 19.6% 0.9% 63.2% 0.3% 2.0% 0.0% 45.5% 2.9% 14.5% 1.3% 56.1% 7.7% 58.1% 3.7% 87.8% AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Fall 2004.
TOTAL STUDENT PROFILE MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Total Headcount Minority International Female 44,836 16.5% 7.4% 53.9% 28,442 9.0% 6.4% 40.4% 40,455 12.4% 8.5% 49.1% 50,995 23.9% 12.3% 53.7% Big Ten figures do not include MSU. Data for Fall 2004.
TOTAL STUDENTPROFILE MSUTrend Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Total Headcount Minority International Female 44,836 16.5% 7.4% 53.9% 21,792 7.4% 5.2% 40.4% 40,108 15.0% 7.8% 49.1% 50,995 47.6% 12.3% 54.2% AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Fall 2004.
TOTAL STUDENT HEADCOUNT MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Total Headcount Minority International Female 44,836 7,393 3,315 24,163 28,442 2,563 1,825 15,263 40,455 5,126 3,663 19,168 50,995 9,440 4,927 26,999 Big Ten figures do not include MSU. Data for Fall 2004.
TOTAL STUDENT HEADCOUNT MSUTrend Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Total Headcount Minority International Female 44,836 7,393 3,315 24,163 21,792 1,614 1,400 10,403 40,108 7,056 3,197 19,137 50,995 13,584 4,927 26,999 AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Fall 2004
TUITION AND SCHOLARSHIPS MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Student Tuition & Fees (thousands) Scholarship Allowances (thousands) Scholarships as a % of Total $354,053 $49,803 14.1% $230,046 $23,935 8.9% $372,132 $50,259 15.6% $647,845 $121,304 22.0% Note: Corrections made to values since 7/27/2005. Big Ten figures do not include MSU. Data for Fiscal Year 2003-04.
TUITION AND SCHOLARSHIPS MSUTrend Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Student Tuition & Fees (thousands) Scholarship Allowances (thousands) Scholarships as a % of Total $354,053 $49,803 14.1% $115,745 $23,935 8.9% $269,262 $48,102 16.5% $486,492 $78,689 30.3% Note: Corrections made to values since 7/27/2005. AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Fiscal Year 2003-04.
SECTION SIZE MSUTrend MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High US News Classes Under 20 US News Classes Over 50 21% 23% 30% 11% 42% 18% 50% 20% Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High US News Classes Under 20 US News Classes Over 50 21% 23% 19% 11% 36% 18% 51% 25% Big Ten and AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Fall 2004.
SIX YEAR GRADUATION RATE MSUTrend MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Predicted 6 yr. Grad Rate* Actual 6 yr. Grad Rate Value Added** 54% 69% +15 58% 54% -5 61% 72% +7 75% 85% +14 Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Predicted 6 yr. Grad Rate* Actual 6 yr. Grad Rate Value Added** 54% 69% +15 59% 54% -5 68% 70% +6 80% 82% +11 *US News & World Report calculation. **Values reflect differences for individual Big Ten institutions and not between figures given above. Big Ten and AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for 2002-03 graduating class.
FIRST YEAR RETENTION MSUTrend MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Undergraduate Rate 89% 83% 89% 96% Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Undergraduate Rate 89% 77% 89% 94% Big Ten and AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for class entering Fall 2002.
DEGREES MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Baccalaureate Masters Doctoral Graduate Professional Total Awards 73.1% 19.6% 4.0% 3.2% 10,832 55.2% 11.4% 4.4% 2.3% 6,220 65.9% 21.1% 4.9% 6.2% 10,245 82.9% 32.1% 6.6% 8.8% 12,585 Big Ten figures do not include MSU. Data for Academic Year 2003-04.
DEGREES MSUTrend Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Baccalaureate Masters Doctoral Graduate Professional Total Awards 73.1% 19.6% 4.0% 3.2% 10,832 60.3% 11.4% 4.1% 0.4% 4,336 70.4% 19.9% 5.1% 4.1% 9,371 82.9% 26.7% 6.6% 7.1% 13,669 AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Academic Year 2003-04.
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT:NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION SURVEY2001-02 MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High $289,787 36 52.4% $285,778 39 36.1% $432,387 18 49.1% $673,724 3 81.0% Expenditures ($ in Thousands) Ranking 5 yr. Increase Big Ten figures do not include MSU. Data for Fiscal Year 2001-02.
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT:NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION SURVEY2001-02 MSUTrend Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High $289,787 36 52% $171,431 75 5.0% $390,827 26 41.8% $662,101 4 63.1% Expenditures ($ in Thousands) Ranking 5 yr. Increase AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Fiscal Year 2001-02.
FACULTY RESEARCH DOLLARS MSUTrend MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High $164 $166 $224 $336 $ Per Tenure System Faculty* (Thousands) Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High $164 $108 $209 $353 $ Per Tenure System Faculty* (Thousands) *Limited to NSF Selected disciplines in Science & Engineering (does not include business, education, communications, etc.) Big Ten and AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Fiscal Year 2001-02.
RESEARCH LAB SPACE MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Square Footage Square Footage per Full-Time Tenure System Faculty Research Expenditures* per Square Foot of Lab Space 1,085,898 562.4 $267 477,701 344.7 $252 1,350,807 639.8 $334 1,640,898 832.9 $451 *Expenditures for Fiscal Year 2001-02 Big Ten figures do not include MSU. Data for Fall 2003.
RESEARCH LAB SPACE MSUTrend Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Square Footage Square Footage per Full-Time Tenure System Faculty Research Expenditures* per Square Foot of Lab Space 1,085,898 562.4 $267 452,412 422.8 $204 1,114,597 639.8 $320 1,640,898 914.1 $578 *Expenditures for Fiscal Year 2001-02 AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Fall 2003.
RESEARCH LIBRARY RANKING MSUTrend MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High ARL Ranking* 39 76 14 6 Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High ARL Ranking* 39 85 33 6 *Based on an index developed by the Association of Research Libraries to measure the relative size of university libraries. Big Ten and AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Fiscal Year 2003-04.
LICENSING REVENUESAND PATENT ACTIVITY MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Licensing Income – Adjusted Gross ($ in Thousands) Licenses and Options: Yielding Income* Executed Start-up Companies U.S. Patent Applications Filed U.S. Patents Issued $24,500 7728 1 64 39 -- 6219 0 35 21 $7,400 15456 4 97 39 $37,600 245177 9 146 87 *Trend not available. Big Ten figures do not include MSU. Data for Fiscal Year 2002-03.
LICENSING REVENUESAND PATENT ACTIVITY MSUTrend Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Licensing Income – Adjusted Gross ($ in Thousands) Licenses and Options: Yielding Income* Executed Start-up Companies U.S. Patent Applications Filed U.S. Patents Issued $24,500 7728 1 64 39 $3,700 10149 3 87 33 $37,600 437187 10 192 87 -- 28 9 0 17 12 *Trend not available. AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Fiscal Year 2002-03.
FUND RAISING MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High $1,207,13133.3% $208,844 15% Endowment (in Thousands)1 5 yr. Change Annual Giving (in Thousands) US News Average Alumni Giving Rate2 $705,85747.0% $110,785 16% $737,704-1.2% $86,582 11% $4,163,38264.8% $262,826 20% 1MSU: Traditional Endowment ($422 M) + MSU Foundation ($284 M) 2US News Survey 2004 Big Ten figures do not include MSU. Data reported as of June 30, 2004.
FUND RAISING MSUTrend Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Endowment (in Thousands)1 5 yr. Change Annual Giving (in Thousands) US News Average Alumni Giving Rate2 $705,85747.0% $110,785 16% $184,187 -1.2% $53,981 8% $959,86128.6% $111,725 16% $1,542,86350.4% $262,826 23% 1MSU: Traditional Endowment ($422 M) + MSU Foundation ($284 M) 2US News Survey 2004 AAU figures do not include MSU. Data reported as of June 30, 2004.
FACULTY COMPOSITION BY APPOINTMENT MSUTrend MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Full-Time Tenure System Full-Time Fixed Term Total Ranked Faculty 80.1% 19.9% 2,322 60.7% 6.7% 1,523 82.5% 17.5% 2,223 93.3% 39.3% 3,468 Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Full-Time Tenure System Full-Time Fixed Term Total Ranked Faculty 80.1% 19.9% 2,322 60.7% 6.5% 1,334 75.8% 24.2% 2,038 93.5% 39.3% 2,996 Big Ten and AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Fall 2003.
FACULTY COMPOSITIONBY GENDER & ETHNICITY MSUTrend Big Ten MSU Low Median High Full-time Tenure System Women as percent of total Full-time Tenure System Minorities as percent of total 536 28.8% 278 15.0% 356 23.1% 161 12.3% 510 27.9% 287 14.5% 726 29.0% 451 19.2% Big Ten figures do not include MSU. Data for Fall 2003.
FACULTY COMPOSITIONBY GENDER & ETHNICITY MSUTrend Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Full-time Tenure System Women as percent of total Full-time Tenure System Minorities as percent of total 536 28.8% 278 15.0% 244 17.5% 118 12.3% 418 27.7% 229 14.8% 726 31.9% 367 18.4% AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Fall 2003.
FACULTY COMPENSATION MSUTrend MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Average Faculty Salary Average Faculty Compensation $83,424 $111,477 $81,791 $104,676 $85,979 $108,478 $95,113 $117,217 Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Average Faculty Salary Average Faculty Compensation $83,424 $111,477 $70,286 $86,916 $85,203 $108,385 $94,221 $122,718 Big Ten and AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Academic Year 2004-05.
GRADUATE ASSISTANTSFTE MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Teaching Assistant Research Assistant Other Assistant Total Grad Assistant 532 922 0 1,445 687 496 0 1,316 913 988 22 2,035 1,129 1,415 437 2,640 Big Ten figures do not include MSU. Data for Fall 2004.
GRADUATE ASSISTANTSFTE MSUTrend Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Teaching Assistant Research Assistant Other Assistant Total Grad Assistant 523 922 0 1,445 267 336 0 685 670 871 22 1,594 1,129 1,415 437 2,640 AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Fall 2004.
GRADUATE ASSISTANTCOMPENSATION MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Teaching Assistant Average Cash Stipend Teaching Assistant Cash + Paid Healthcare Research Assistant Average Cash Stipend Research Assistant Cash + Paid Healthcare $13,004 $14,377 $13,467 $14,840 $9,478 $11,638 $10,734 $11,478 $12,050 $13,379 $13,584 $14,482 $13,893 $16,360 $14,879 $17,346 Big Ten figures do not include MSU. Data for Academic Year 2004-05.
GRADUATE ASSISTANTCOMPENSATION MSUTrend Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Teaching Assistant Average Cash Stipend Teaching Assistant Cash + Paid Healthcare Research Assistant Average Cash Stipend Research Assistant Cash + Paid Healthcare $13,004 $14,337 $13,467 $14,840 $9,478 $11,638 $10,189 $11,810 $12,574 $13,513 $13,882 $14,492 $16,218 $19,653 $17,874 $21,309 AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Academic Year 2003-04.
SUPPORT STAFF MSUTrend MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Total Support Staff Professional Support Full-Time Support Staff/ Ranked Faculty Ratio 7,130 3,849 3.1 5,747 2,168 3.0 8,616 3,847 3.5 16,354 7,549 5.8 Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Total Support Staff Professional Support Full-Time Support Staff/ Ranked Faculty Ratio 7,130 3,849 3.1 3,766 1,668 2.8 7,398 3,242 3.1 16,354 7,549 5.8 Big Ten and AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Fall 2003.
EXPENDITURES BY MISSION MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Instruction Research Public Service Mission Subtotal 32% 17% 12% 61% 16% 8% 2% 32% 21% 15% 6% 43% 34% 34% 8% 62% Big Ten figures do not include MSU. Data for Fiscal Year 2003-04.
EXPENDITURES BY MISSION MSUTrend Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Instruction Research Public Service Mission Subtotal* 32% 17% 12% 61% 15% 12% 2% 31% 24% 21% 7% 56% 34% 34% 16% 65% AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Fiscal Year 2003-04.
ACADEMIC SUPPORTPER FTE STUDENT MSUTrend MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High Dollars per Student $1,469 $1,036 $2,817 $5,794 Land Grant AAU MSU Low Median High Dollars per Student $1,469 $1,036 $2,333 $5,794 Big Ten and AAU figures do not include MSU. Data for Fiscal Year 2002-03.
PHYSICAL PLANT EXPENDITURES MSUTrend BIG TEN MSU Low Median High $1.49 $2.14 $1.97 $3.74 $8.65 $0.35 $0.96 $0.87 $1.21 $3.75 Physical Plant Unit Costs Administrative/Engineering Custodial Maintenance Utilities Total Cost per Square Foot $0.27 $0.84 $0.79 $1.43 $3.33 $0.65 $1.14 $0.92 $1.75 $4.76 Big Ten figures do not include MSU. Data from 2001-02 APPA Survey.