1 / 39

Branching ratio and helicity amplitudes for L b  L (pK) g decays ( L spin = 3/2)

Theoretical physics for experimentalists:. Branching ratio and helicity amplitudes for L b  L (pK) g decays ( L spin = 3/2). Combined work of: Gudrun Hiller (Dortmund UNI), the Bearer of the Light Thomas Schietinger (PSI), the Scholar

sadie
Download Presentation

Branching ratio and helicity amplitudes for L b  L (pK) g decays ( L spin = 3/2)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Theoretical physics for experimentalists: Branching ratio and helicity amplitudes for Lb L(pK) g decays (L spin = 3/2) Combined work of: • Gudrun Hiller(Dortmund UNI), the Bearer of the Light • Thomas Schietinger(PSI), the Scholar • Mathias KnechtandFederica Legger (EPFL), the water Carriers

  2. Outline • Once upon a time: • the electromagnetic penguin bsg • the photon polarization (theory and experiment) • my thesis results & open questions • The mighty quest for L spin = 3/2: • Branching ratio for Lb L(pK) g • the tools: Mathematica • Helicity amplitudes • Sensitivity to photon polarization • Summary and outlook

  3. u d c s t b Motivations • Standard Model (SM): best description of known elementary particles and their interactions: • passed all experimental tests up to now; • still one missing particle, the Higgs boson. However... • 19 (!!!) free parameters; • gravity is not included. • Quest for new physics in the quark sector: • CKM picture is very successful • but we still know little about b  s, d transitions ! leptons e ne m nm t nt quarks

  4. The electromagnetic penguin bsg g u,c,t b W s • New physics in the decay rate : • are there any contribution from supersymmetric particles? • the measured bsg branching fraction is compatible with SM prediction • Theory:BF(bsg) [10-6]= 357 ± 30 • Experiment:BF(bsg) [10-6]= 355 ± 24 +9-10 ± 3 • from HFAG (combined measurements by Belle, BaBar, CLEO) • Need other observables to test the SM... Gambino, Misiak, NPB 611 (2001) 338 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag/rare

  5. The electromagnetic penguin bsg g • The W boson only couples to a left-handed s quark • Left-handed photon (to conserve ang. momentum) u,c,t b W s Photon polarization: “Naïve” SM • pure 2-body decay: right-handed components of the order ofr = ms/mb Atwood, Gronau, Soni, PRL 79, 185 (1997) SM + QCD • when considering bsg + gluons • right-handed components may be up to10-15% • explicit calculations only for BK*g, Brg Grinstein, Grossman, Ligeti, Pirjol, PRD 71, 011504 (2005)

  6. Photon polarization measurements Exp. status Theor. Refs. e+e- conversion First measurements of K* polarization in B->K*l+l- by Belle/Babar Grossman, Pirjol, JHEP06, 029 (2000) Melikov, Nikitin, Simula, PLB 442, 381 (1998) Latest world average sin2b = 0.0 ± 0.3 Atwood, Gronau, Soni, PRL 79, 185 (1997) B-B interference B factories Difficult to disentangle resonance structure (Babar, hep/0507031) Gronau, Pirjol, PRD 66, 054008 (2002) Higher K* resonances Gronau, Grossman, Pirjol, PRL 88, 051802 (2002) Charmonium res. interference No results so far... Knecht, Schietinger, PLB 634, 403 (2006) Mannel, Recksiegel, JPG: NPP 24, 979 (1998) Exploit ang. correlations between polarized initial state and final state. Under study at LHCb (F.Legger, M. Knecht) LHCb b-baryons Hiller, Kagan, PRD 65, 074038 (2002) Legger, Schietinger, PLB 644 (2007) xxx

  7. Polarized b baryons decays • If initial state is polarized: • exploit angular correlations between initial and final states • only possible with b baryons • feasible at hadron colliders Case study: Lb (L(1115)  pp) g g Long distance contributions from internal W exchange, or vector meson cc contributions are expected to be small b s Lb L d d u u Mannel, Recksiegel, JPG: NPP 24, 979 (1998) Hiller, Kagan, PRD 65, 074038 (2002)

  8. Polarized Lb L(1115) g decays • Angular distributions: depend on photon polarization ag • PB = Lb polarization • ap = weak decay parameter Lb L(1115) g Lb L(1115) g Evtgen ag = 1 PB = 1 ag (fit) = 1.036 ag (theory) = 1 ap (fit) = 0.679 ap(theory) = 0.642 cosqg, Lb rest frame cosqp, L rest frame

  9. However... • From the experimental point of view the decay Lb L(1115) g is quite hard to observe (ct = 7.89 cm) • Can we probe the photon polarization in heavier L resonance decays? • Lb (L(X)  pK) g • what do we need? • Branching ratios for Lb L(X) g • Angular distributions for L spin = 1/2, 3/2 • spin > 3/2: helicity states > observables g b s K u Lb u p d d u u

  10. L(X) resonance spectrum 1520 L spin = 3/2 L spin = 1/2 1690 1670 PDG 2004 • Invariant pK mass spectrum obtained with: • BR(Lb L(X) g ), calculated rescaling BR(Lb L(1115) g ) with a kinematical factor, assuming the same form factors and no spin dependencefor allL(X) resonances. Legger, Schietinger, PLB 644 (2007) xxx

  11. Helicity formalism for Lb L(pK) g JL = 1/2 JL = 3/2 • Photon helicity = ±1, • L helicity = ±1/2 • 2 helicity amplitudes • Photon angular distribution • Proton angular distribution flat because of P conservation • Photon helicity = ±1, • L helicity = ±1/2, ±3/2 • 4 helicity amplitudes • Photon angular distribution Legger, Schietinger, PLB 644 (2007) xxx

  12. Lb L(pK) g decays(JL = 3/2) • ag,3/2 depends on the asymmetry of Lb spin with respect to photon momentum • and can be factorized into the photon helicity parameter ag and the strong parameter  •  can be extracted from the proton angular distribution Legger, Schietinger, PLB 644 (2007) xxx

  13. Open questions • The photon helicity can be probed in decays involving L resonances of spin 3/2 by measuring ag,3/2 and  • Can we get a better estimate of the BR ? • Include at least the spin dependence • Form factors will have to be measured • Can we get an estimation of ?

  14. Decay amplitude for Lb L(1520) g The effective hamiltonian: • Electromagnetic dipole operators: • long distance effects • non perturbative approach (HQET) • Wilson coefficients: C7, C7’ • short distance • Fermi theory (point-like interactions)

  15. Decay amplitude for Lb L(1520) g The effective hamiltonian: The matrix element: (q, e) g L(1520) (p´,s´) Lb (p, s)

  16. Decay amplitude for Lb L(1520) g The effective hamiltonian: u(p,s) = Dirac spinor to describe the Lb (spin 1/2) Rarita-Schwinger (RS) spinor to describe the L (spin 3/2) The matrix element: Rarita, Schwinger, Phys Rev 60(1941) 61 Dirac spinor Polarization vector 1/2  1 = 3/2 Find Gan and G(5)an!!

  17. Conditions Equations of motion (EOM) On-shell photon RS spinors Gauge invariance Main actors:

  18. Gan and G(5)an We define the tensor Gamn(antisymmetric in m and n): Ansatz:

  19. Gan and G(5)an We define the tensor Gamn(antisymmetric in m and n): Ansatz: On-shell photon! Reabsorbed in B and C using EOM

  20. Gan and G(5)an We define the tensor Gamn(antisymmetric in m and n): Ansatz: On-shell photon! Reabsorbed in B and C using EOM Contracting with qm

  21. Gan and G(5)an Form factors G(5)an is related to G(5)an through the identity: it is straightforward to obtain (ask Mathias) :

  22. Spin averaged matrix element To evaluate the BR we need: Writing explicitely the spinor indices! where

  23. Spin averaged matrix element Sum over spins: Aliev, Ozpineci, hep-ph/0406331 We finally obtain: To calculate the trace we use: with the TRACER package

  24. Trace evaluation

  25. Trace evaluation

  26. Branching Ratio In the limit BR (Lb L0g ) ~ 7·10-5 f2

  27. HFAG ICHEP 2006 From B+ and B0 radiative decays, and dedicated form factors studies, BR should have the same order of magnitude K*(892) = vector K1(1270) = axial vectorK1(1400) = axial vector K2*(1430) = tensor S. Veseli, M.G. Olsson, Z. Phys. C 71 (1996) 287

  28. Helicity amplitudes We use the Lb rest frame: Lb L(1520) z g p´=(E´,0,0,E) q=(E,0,0,-E)

  29. Helicity amplitudes The amplitudes A3/2 (A1/2 ) result from aLb-baryon with h = 1/2 (h = +1/2) and a photon with Jz= +1 Dirac spinor RS spinor L polarization vectors: Photon polarization vectors: Jz in Lb rest frame: L helicity

  30. Helicity amplitudes: results Right-handed photon In the limit and f1~f2

  31. Helicity amplitudes: naïve picture b Left-handed photon = SM Quark level: g Spin flip b vs s s b Lb Spin flip Lb vs L s g L(1520) b Opposed b and Lb spin -> suppressed ~ O(1/mb) Lb s g L(1520) M. Suzuki, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 31 (2005) 755

  32. Sensitivity to the photon polarization LbPolarization = 20% 10k L(1520) events (~3 yrs LHCb running) 3ssignificance Photon polarization:

  33. Conclusions and outlook • The BR(Lb L(1520) g) has been calculated in the framework of HQET • form factors will need to be measured • Helicity amplitudes for the decay Lb L(1520) g have been evaluated • straightforward extension to decay involving JP = 3/2+ resonances, by replacing C ’7-> -C ’7 • Still to do: work out a better estimate of the Lb polarization • (Some) theoretical models and calculations are (also) accessible to experimentalists!

  34. Backup slides

  35. Lb production at LHC: • bb cross section in pp collision =500 mb • 10% of produced bb hadronize in baryons • Lb dominates (90%) • Lb produced with transversal polarization • Expectations are PB~ 20% • ATLAS plans to measure it with a statistical precision better than 1% n Lb p1 p2 Ajaltouni, Conte, Leitner,PLB, 614 (2005) 165 Feasibility of Beauty Baryon Polarization Measurement in Lb J/Y L decay channel by ATLAS – Atlas note 94-036 PHYS

  36. Photon polarization • Lb L(1670) g selected evts. (transversally polarized Lb) • efficiency corrected (from unpolarized decays) • from data, the correction can be obtained from B  K*g decays ag

  37. Sensitivity on |r| measurement 1 year, 3s 5 years, 3s SM naive SM naive SM + QCD SM + QCD Lb Polarization = 20% • Values of |r| that can be probed from single measurements • Getting close to the SM expected range, becomes interesting if NP!

  38. Combined measurements 1 year, 3s 5 years, 3s SM + QCD SM + QCD SM naive SM naive Lb Polarization = 20% • Combining measurement increases range by a few percent at most • L(X) measurements have good sensitivity (in case L(1115) turns out to be difficult)

  39. Dependence on Lb polarization 1 year Lb L(X) g Lb L(1115) g • If only the photon asymmetry is measured, a polarization of at least 20% is needed to have good sensitivity

More Related