90 likes | 253 Views
Latest Results on Variational Soil Moisture Initialisation. Martin Lange and Christoph Schraff martin.lange@dwd.de christoph.schraff@dwd.de. ELDAS experiments for May – December 2000. model setup LM version 3.15 ELDAS configurations, 2-layer soil model
E N D
Latest Results on Variational Soil Moisture Initialisation Martin Lange and Christoph Schraff martin.lange@dwd.de christoph.schraff@dwd.de 05.08.2005 - 1 -
ELDAS experiments for May – December 2000 • model setup • LM version 3.15 • ELDAS configurations, 2-layer soil model • continuous assimilation cycle, 00-UTC forecasts • parameters setup related to soil moisture initialisation (SMA) for 4 experiments • variables in cost function precipitation fields used to update • (for which prediction should soil moisture from one day to next • be improved by design) (evaporation always from model) • ‘SMA-T2m’ T2m precipitation of model forecast • ‘SMA-T2m+Rh2m’ T2m + RH2m precipitation of model forecast • ‘SMA-T2m+Rubel prec.’ T2m observed (‘Rubel’) precipitation • ‘SMA-T2m+Rh2m+Rubel’ T2m + RH2mobserved (‘Rubel’) precipitation • ‘no SMA’ - - 05.08.2005 - 2 -
ELDAS domain average of soil moisture increments in bottom layer time series of running monthly mean model increments SMA increments evaporation > precipitation in summer SMA increments have more variability top-layer mean increments are much smaller (not shown) 05.08.2005 - 3 -
root mean square over ELDAS domain of bottom-layer soil moisture increments time series of running monthly mean model increments SMA increments SMA increments >> model increments, further increased if RH2m in cost function 05.08.2005 - 4 -
root mean square over ELDAS domain of top-layer soil moisture increments time series of running monthly mean model increments SMA increments ( model increments smaller if observed precipitation used ) SMA increments < model increments, yet increased if RH2m in cost function 05.08.2005 - 5 -
T2m forecasts for 12 and 15 UTC (ELDAS domain and time average for 00-UTC LM runs) time series of running monthly mean bias r m s e SMA reduces bias in warm season SMA reduces rmse by ≥10% in warm season, use of RH2m slightly beneficial use of observed precip slightly beneficial 05.08.2005 - 6 -
RH2m forecasts for 12 and 15 UTC (ELDAS domain and time average for 00-UTC LM runs) time series of running monthly mean bias r m s e use of RH2m reduces bias in May - July SMA reduces rmse by 10 – 30 %, use of RH2m beneficial use of observed precip beneficial 05.08.2005 - 7 -
6- to 30-hour precipitation forecasts(ELDAS domain average for 00-UTC LM runs) time series of running monthly mean frequency bias 5 mm threshold TSS SMA strongly reduced bias, increases TSS by about 5 – 10 % use of RH2m : neutral impact use of observed precip : beneficial 05.08.2005 - 8 -
Conclusions • current implementation of soil moisture initialisation is strongly beneficial for prediction of daytime T2m and RH2m, and also beneficial for precipitation forecasts • inclusion of RH2m in addition to T2m in cost function further improves predicted RH2m • use of observed precipitation to update soil moisture in time further improved prediction of daytime RH2m and of precipitation • best results with both modifications Note • the soil moisture initialisation adapted to the multi-layer soil model is running in the pre-operational LME suite Further Plan • investigation to replace the variationally derived relationship between 2-m temperature (+ 2-m humidity) and soil moisture by a parameterized regression. • this would render obsolete the extra model forecast integrations required in the current SMI implementation 05.08.2005 - 9 -