1 / 10

Indigenous R & D efforts for HEP detectors Glass Resistive Plate Chambers for INO experiment

Indigenous R & D efforts for HEP detectors Glass Resistive Plate Chambers for INO experiment. Proposer: B.Satyanarayana Mentor: Prof Naba K Mondal Department of High Energy Physics, TIFR, Mumbai, 400005. What is the need?. Detectors form the core of scientific research!

sage
Download Presentation

Indigenous R & D efforts for HEP detectors Glass Resistive Plate Chambers for INO experiment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Indigenous R & D efforts for HEP detectorsGlass Resistive Plate Chambers for INO experiment Proposer: B.Satyanarayana Mentor: Prof Naba K Mondal Department of High Energy Physics, TIFR, Mumbai, 400005

  2. What is the need? • Detectors form the core of scientific research! • What is ‘discoverable’ in an experiment is often limited by capabilities of the employed detector • Why do we need indigenous development? • Need for large and sustained efforts • Rich experience of various detector development activities for KGF, DZERO, CMS experiments • Now, the proposed Indian-based Neutrino Observatory (INO) is looking for a new detector! DAE Vision 2020, Subtopic 3.8, May 3-4, 2004

  3. The proposed INO detector • RPC dimension: 3m X 2m • No of chambers: 11K • No of channels: 220K • No of TDC channels: 3K Magnetised iron calorimeter Iron 140 layers RPC 35KTons DAE Vision 2020, Subtopic 3.8, May 3-4, 2004

  4. Why RPCs? • Rugged, cheap and easy to produce large area cells • Good timing, counting rate, spatial resolution, large signals • Can take roles of tracking, timing, particle identification and (even) calorimeter detectors • Being used or planned for many HEP, Cosmic ray, astroparticle physics experiments: • All four LHC experiments, Belle, Babar, HARP, EAS-TOP • Choice of designs, modes of operation, gases etc DAE Vision 2020, Subtopic 3.8, May 3-4, 2004

  5. A typical RPC construction DAE Vision 2020, Subtopic 3.8, May 3-4, 2004

  6. RPC R & D infrastructure at TIFR DAE Vision 2020, Subtopic 3.8, May 3-4, 2004

  7. A few of our preliminary results DAE Vision 2020, Subtopic 3.8, May 3-4, 2004

  8. Proposal for new work • Double-gap, multi-gap and Hybrid designs • Avalanche versus streamer modes of operation • Gas mixture studies and optimization • MIP efficiency issues • Improvement of time resolution • Special RPCs for finer spatial resolution • The all important ageing concerns DAE Vision 2020, Subtopic 3.8, May 3-4, 2004

  9. Proposed plan for new work • Gases, mixing, circulation and monitoring systems • Industrial help for resistive coats on electrodes etc. • In-house development of electronics and DAQ • Simulation studies – Process, Device and Detector • Meeting INO design requirements in the process • RPC deployments beyond INO • Possible spinoffs … DAE Vision 2020, Subtopic 3.8, May 3-4, 2004

  10. A proposed spinoff • Positron Emission Tomography (PET) • A radiotracer imaging technique using positron emitting radio nuclides • Applications include: • Early detection of cancer • Neurophysiological studies • Quantification of brain functions • Natural advantages in case of RPC • Intrinsic layered structure (~100 layers) • Simple and economic construction • Time-of-Flight capability • Considerably lower radiation levels for whole-body PET DAE Vision 2020, Subtopic 3.8, May 3-4, 2004

More Related