190 likes | 355 Views
A Partner by Any Other Name…. Peter Scott Peter Scott Consulting. The management of change. The changing needs of clients Recruitment and retention of good people The war on talent. Partnership.
E N D
A Partner by Any Other Name…. Peter Scott Peter Scott Consulting
The management of change • The changing needs of clients • Recruitment and retention of good people • The war on talent PETER SCOTT CONSULTING
Partnership “The relationship which subsists between persons carrying on a business in common with a view to profit” Section 1 - Partnership Act 1890 PETER SCOTT CONSULTING
When does a partnership exist? • The sharing of gross returns does not of itself create a partnership Section 2(2) – PA 1890 • The receipt of a share of net profits is evidence of a partnership Section 2(3) – PA 1890 PETER SCOTT CONSULTING
Equity Partner Profits • PEP currently dominates thinking • But equity partners are also OWNERS of the firm • Trends are towards: - tighter equity - building capital values PETER SCOTT CONSULTING
Profit (and ownership) in return for …….? • What should an equity partner bring to the firm? • Each firm’s ‘values’ will be different • Trends in criteria for entry to equity partnership? PETER SCOTT CONSULTING
One firm’s criteria for equity Being an excellent lawyer is not enough – that is a given • Leadership and vision and a determination to develop the firm’s business • Wisdom and maturity of thought • Highly respected internally and externally, based upon strong reputation and judgment • Committed • Team player • Commercially astute PETER SCOTT CONSULTING
How to measure contribution? • Fairly match reward to contribution • Measure what matters – so align reward mechanisms to achieving strategic objectives • Contribution should be measured across a broad range of partner roles PETER SCOTT CONSULTING
Is there an ideal number of equity partners? Factors impacting on numbers may include: • Need to enhance PEP • Need for “human capital” • Need for financial capital • Succession planning • mergers PETER SCOTT CONSULTING
Why do firms have non-equity partners? • Desire to keep equity tight • External perception of size • A learning step PETER SCOTT CONSULTING
Fixed share partners • May involve the fiction of small investment / profit percentage, • In reality are like salaried partners but lose employment rights • May need a guaranteed floor level (equity profits abate first) • Often excluded from financial information PETER SCOTT CONSULTING
Salaried Partners • Not ‘real’ partners – unsatisfactory status • Contractually and tax status that of employees • Cost to firm of employers’ NIC PETER SCOTT CONSULTING
Members of LLPs • No difference for equity members (taxed like partners) • But no requirement that to be a member a person must be entitled to a share of the LLP’s profits • So members can be fixed share and salaried PETER SCOTT CONSULTING
Fixed share and salaried members • A member is self employed unless, if he was a partner in a partnership he would be regarded as employed by the partnership – section 4(4) LLP Act 2000 • So an LLP can have salaried members • But – are they Schedule D or Schedule E? - Revenue’s approach? - Divorce of employment law and tax law? PETER SCOTT CONSULTING
Members rights - implications for LLPs? • More regulated • Default rules • Statutory rights PETER SCOTT CONSULTING
LLP Default Rules applicable to ALL members • Rule 7 “The books and records of the LLP are to be made available for inspection ……………..and every member of the LLP may when he thinks fit have access to and inspect and copy any of them” • Rule 8 “Each member shall render true accounts and full information of all things affecting the LLP to any member or his legal representatives” But these default rules can be varied PETER SCOTT CONSULTING
But – bear in mind the statutory rights of every member Principally rights to information relating to the LLP’s accounts, its accounting records and its financial position, for example: The right at all times to inspect the accounting records of the LLP - Section 221(1) CA 1985 The right to receive a copy of the LLP’s accounts together with a copy of the auditors report – section 238(1) CA 1985 PETER SCOTT CONSULTING
Current trends? • The performance bar is being raised for each type of partner / member • Is there a need for non-equity partners? - as a learning stage / career paths - as a means of retaining good people - need to keep the equity tight to enhance PEP and to build capital values PETER SCOTT CONSULTING