130 likes | 264 Views
UA Human Resources Redesign Update. May/June 2007. UNIVERSITY of ALASKA – Many Traditions One Alaska. Case for Change. Over time the University has evolved Organizational changes Procedural changes Labor agreement changes Segal Sibson Study
E N D
UA Human Resources Redesign Update May/June 2007 UNIVERSITY of ALASKA – Many Traditions One Alaska
Case for Change • Over time the University has evolved • Organizational changes • Procedural changes • Labor agreement changes • Segal Sibson Study • Three distinct HR offices • Different processes • Process inefficiencies • Decision to Proceed in November 2006 • Transition Manager Hired • Initiated the Redesign Program
The mission of UAHR UAHR MISSION STATEMENT It is the mission of the University of Alaska Human Resources to support the University’s mission of teaching, research and public service by creating and maintaining a work climate that is characterized by fair treatment of all employees, open communications, personal accountability, trust and mutual respect.
The UAHR CharterWhat we stand for … and what we’ll stand on. To deliver on our mission, UAHR will strive to attract and retain a high quality, diverse workforce; develop and reward talent and innovation; and promote academic excellence, student success and lifelong learning while adhering to the following principles for working with our customers and each other:
UAHR Design Update Reminder: We are working to… • Integrate the statewide and Fairbanks campus HR function • Define a charter for UAHR that drives our mission to help UA execute its mission through its people • Improve and streamline our HR processes and delivery of our services • Provide development opportunities for our HR leaders and staff • Identify how we will measure our effectiveness going forward An update on our progress… • We’ve built our HR Charter • We’ve identified our HR process design priorities, and have mapped our “as-is” priority processes • We conducted a workload study with Human Resources staff and key HR processes supporters working within the University • We’re in the final stages of drafting our UAHR guiding principles – with input from UA leadership, HR staff and the senior advisory group • We continue to meet with our senior advisory group, made up of key HR customers
A four-phased approach to redesign • Our “discovery” work is close to complete – we anticipate all milestones reached by June 2007.
What we completed through the “Discovery” phase To understand the “as is” condition of Fairbanks-based Human Resources functions and its processes we are: • Interviewing every Fairbanks-based HR employee – one on one • Interviewing key leadership, customers and PPAs • Prioritizing HR business processes for redesign • Establishing process design teams • Completing process mapping for priority processes • Completing an HR workload study to measure process labor
Why focus on process design? Focusing on process will: • Ensure HR understands and can support customer needs and expectations • Identify where HR has inadequate resources or can align resources more effectively • Build consistent delivery of HR practices and services to the University • Identify opportunities for improved HR and customer training and communication
Our highest priority processes for redesign HR staff and the HR redesign senior advisory group identified these processes as having the most critical need for improvement: • Recruitment – faculty (including adjuncts and post-docs), staff, students, foreign nationals and executives • “On-boarding” (i.e., bringing faculty and staff into the University after they accept a job offer) • Job classification and reclassification • Exceptional compensation • Performance appraisals and performance management • Termination and non-retention • Benefits orientation
Process design mapping sessions We facilitated intensive one-day sessions through which we inventoried and mapped the current state of each priority process: • We discussed the culture and customer perspective • We established the flow of information and coordination of process inputs • We identified exceptions and differences across the process • We identified all parties responsible for a given process • We listed all the steps for a given process • We mapped all process steps based on work performed by responsible parties • Our process mapping sessions uncovered significant differences and inconsistencies in processes across Fairbanks-based HR functions. Simplicity and standardization will be key to a successful redesign.
HR Redesign Workload Study The HR Redesign Workload Study is our final “discovery” deliverable. The study will help us to: • Identify the main Human Resources functions currently performed by staff • Identify the possible overlaps and gaps in the work each function performs • Ensure we have the resources needed to deliver HR service in the improved, future state Fairbanks-based HR staff, PPAs, and other line staff supporting HR business processes will be invited to complete the workload study. Staff input is confidential and will be reported in aggregate only. Segal/Sibson will conduct the study in May.
What’s next? • We are transitioning into the Redesign Phase • We need to redesign inefficient processes • We need to redesign an effective organization • We need to identify and develop training needs • We need to implement other improvements to HR along the way
For more information Visit the HR Redesign web site for updates and reference and background material. www.alaska.edu/hr/redesign/ The site includes: • Announcements and links to HR redesign news • Information regarding redesign committee members and process teams • Redesign documents, reports and recommendations • Answers to frequently asked questions • We encourage you to submit your HR redesign questions and feedback through the our web site. Watch for updated FAQs every two weeks.