1 / 41

IEEE 802.11 TGaf Meeting Plan and Agenda

IEEE 802.11 TGaf Meeting Plan and Agenda. Date: 2010-11-08. Authors:. Abstract. This presentation is the agenda and meeting plan for the meeting of IEEE 802.11 TGaf taking place the week of November 8, 2010 at the IEEE 802 Wireless Interim in Dallas, Texas. Plan for the Week.

sakura
Download Presentation

IEEE 802.11 TGaf Meeting Plan and Agenda

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IEEE 802.11 TGafMeeting Plan and Agenda Date: 2010-11-08 Authors: Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  2. Abstract This presentation is the agenda and meeting plan for the meeting of IEEE 802.11 TGaf taking place the week of November 8, 2010 at the IEEE 802 Wireless Interim in Dallas, Texas. Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  3. Plan for the Week • Approve meeting and teleconference minutes, Draft d0.06 and comment resolution spreadsheet 11-10/595r14 • Review progress from the weekly teleconferences • Plan and execute Draft cleanup • Work with 802.18 on FCC 10-174 Petition for Reconsideration • Direct the Editor to create draft 1.0 to begin first WG letter ballot • Plan for January and teleconferences • Task Group Officers • Chair: Rich Kennedy (Research In Motion) • Vice-chair: Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems) • Recording Secretary: Zhou Lan (NICT) Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  4. Monday PM1 Agenda • Meeting call to order • Administrative items including IEEE IP statement • Modify and approve the agenda • Approve meeting and teleconference minutes • Review progress from the weekly teleconferences • Plan and begin execution of draft cleanup • Recess Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  5. Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants: • “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents • “Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents orpatent claims • “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) • The above does not apply if the patentclaim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2 • Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged • No duty to perform a patent search Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  6. Patent Related Links All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources: IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6 IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3 Material about the patent policy is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee.org or visit http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/index.html This slide set is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  7. Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings • All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. • Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. • Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. • Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. • Technical considerations remain primary focus • Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. • Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. • Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. --------------------------------------------------------------- See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  8. Call for Potentially Essential Patents If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: • Either speak up now or • Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or • Cause an LOA to be submitted Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  9. Other Documents and WebPages to Review • Please review the documents at the following links:-  IEEE Patent Policy - http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt-  Patent FAQ - http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/faq.pdf-  LoA Form - http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/loa.pdf-  Affiliation FAQ -http://standards.ieee.org/faqs/affiliationFAQ.html -  Anti-Trust FAQ - http://standards.ieee.org/resources/antitrust-guidelines.pdf-  Ethics - http://www.ieee.org/portal/cms_docs/about/CoE_poster.pdf-  IEEE 802.11 Working Group P&P -https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/public-file/07/11-07-0360-04-0000-802-11-policies-and-procedures.doc • New 802 WG P&P: https://mentor.ieee.org/802-ec/dcn/09/ec-09-0007-02-00EC-draft-lmsc-wg-p-p.pdf • New 802 LMSC P&P:https://mentor.ieee.org/802-ec/dcn/09/ec-09-0005-02-00EC-draft-revised-lmsc-p-p-for-wg-p-p-ballot.pdf • New 802 LMSC OM:https://mentor.ieee.org/802-ec/dcn/09/ec-09-0006-02-00EC-draft-revision-of-the-lmsc-om-for-wg-p-p.pdf Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  10. Meeting Etiquette • IEEE 802 is a world-wide professional technical organization • Meetings are to be conducted in an orderly and professionalmanner in accordance with the policies and procedures governed by the organization. • Individuals are to address the “Technical” content of the subject under consideration and refrain from making “personal” comments to or about the presenter. Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  11. Task Group Chair’s Functions • [From the 802.11 Working Group Operations Manual] • The TG Chair may decide non-technical issues or may put them to a vote of the TG. The TG participants and the Chair decide technical issues by vote. The TG Chair decides what is non-technical and what is technical. • The TG Chair is responsible for presiding over TG sessions. • The TG Chair shall operate the TG in an unbiased fashion. To maintain impartiality, the TG Chair shall refrain from taking sides in debate on technical motions. • It is the responsibility of the TG Chair to lead the TG in producing a quality draft standard in a timely fashion as specified by the specific PAR Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  12. Introduction • WELCOME to the sixth face-to-face meeting of IEEE 802.11 TGaf! • On Friday, November 20, 2009 the IEEE 802.11 TGaf was approved by the EC (10/1/4) with this motion: • Believing that the PAR and Five Criteria contained in the document referenced below meet IEEE-SA guidelines, • Move to forward the 802.11 TVWS PAR information from 11-09/934r8 to NesCom. • On December 8th NesCom approved the formation of the Task Group for P802.11af • We are heading down the homestretch to the first WG letter ballot, needing only to clean up the draft and incorporate changes from FCC 10-174 Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  13. PAR Scope and Purpose • Approved PAR Scope: An amendment that defines modifications to both the 802.11 physical layers (PHY) and the 802.11 Medium Access Control Layer (MAC), to meet the legal requirements for channel access and coexistence in the TV White Space • Approved PAR Purpose: The purpose of this amendment is to allow 802.11 wireless networks to be used in the TV white space Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  14. Purpose, Principles and Vision/Outcome“If you don't know where you are going, you might wind up someplace else.”* • 11-06-0056-00-0000-cbp-and-david-allens-methods • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Getting_Things_Done • Purpose: the Task Group should create an amendment whose implementation in solutions is likely to receive FCC approval for operation in the TV White Spaces under the 47 CFR Part 15 subpart H rules. • Principles: • If the FCC changes the rules, the Task Group should change the amendment accordingly • The amendment should not duplicate functionality that is being standardized in other Task Groups that are likely to complete before 802.11af. • There is no need for backwards compatibility with 2.45 GHz ISM operation. • The starting point is changes to Clauses 17 and 19 and Annexes D and E • Vision/Outcome: Use the OFDM PHYs with 5-, 10- and 20-MHz channel widths to specify the basis for a system that the regulators can approve for operation in the TVWS bands. * Yogi Berra Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  15. TV Bands Regulatory Requirements • These [FCC] rules are primarily intended to ensure the efficient sharing of the TV Bands while protecting incumbent users • The FCC has enabled this band for TVBDs if and only if the licensed users’ interests are protected • We must not interfere • Mitigation of any interference issue should not increase the enforcement requirements for the Commission • There are no formal changes in regulatory status since San Diego • Expected announcement on September 23rd at FCC Open Meeting Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  16. Teleconference Minutes • Posted Minutes • September Meeting in Waikoloa • 11-10-1183-01-00af-hawaii-meeting-minutes.doc (posted 27-Sep-2010 21:40:56) • September 28th, October 12th, 19th, 26th and November 2nd teleconferences • 11-10-1187-00-00af-sep-28th-teleconference-minutes.doc (posted 30-Sep-2010 10:37:57) • 11-10-1208-00-00af-Oct-12th-teleconference-minutes.doc (posted 19-Oct-2010 14:27:30) • 11-10-1215-00-00af-october-19th-teleconference-minutes.doc (posted 25-Oct-2010 17:10:21) • 11-10-1240-00-00af-october-26th-teleconference-minutes.doc (posted 03-Nov-2010 11:42:3) • 11-10-1241-00-00af-Nov-2nd-teleconference-minutes.doc (posted 03-Nov-2010 14:55:13) Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  17. Motion #1 • Motion: • To approve the TGaf minutes from the September Interim in Waikoloa, and the September 28th, October 12th, 19th and 26th, and November 2nd teleconferences in documents 11-10/1183r1, 11-10/1187r0, 11-10/1208r0, 11-10/1215r0, 11-10/1240r0 and 11-10/1241r0 respectively • Moved by: • Seconded by: • Discussion on the motion? • Vote: Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  18. Plan and Execute Draft Cleanup • Cleanup plan • Vote on or remove un-voted resolutions (V/RUR) • Eliminate multiple solutions/comment (EMS/C) • Correct known errors (CKE) • Changes to regulatory items (REG) • Based on regulations changes • Need to move to regulatory annex to enable global applicability • Execution • Small teams to address the issues • EMS/C: • V/RUR: • CKE: • REG: • Vote on team proposals Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  19. Draft Submissions Items Never Voted • 11-10/710r4, the TV band DSE procedure and the multi-band DSE procedure • 11-10/711r5, update of the E2.4 DSE procedure • 11-10/712r4, proposed changes regarding Measurement • 11-10/813r7, enablement request/grant exchange between beaconing stations with the enabler entity • 11-10/1037r3clarify the usage of the DSE signalling methods according to the deployment scenarios. • 11-10/794r6 comment resolutions did not change text, but responds to 55 comments • 11-10/1233r0 • 1232r0 • 1040r3 • 1231r1 Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  20. Multiple Resolutions • CIDs 4, 5 Agree in Principle 11-10/737r3 Approved in July 2010, Agree in Principle 11-10/767r1 Approved in July 2010 • CID 6 Agree In Principle 11-10/737r3 Approved in July 2010, Disagree 11-10/790r2 Approved in July 2010 • CID 23 Agree in Principle 11-10/737r3 Approved in July 2010, Agree in Principle 11-10/790r2 Approved in July 2010. • CID 113 Agree 11-10/724r3 Approved in July 2010, Agree in Principle 11-10/767r1 Approved in July 2010. • CID 114 Agree in Principle 11-10/724r3 Approved in July 2010. Agree in Principle based on the discussion and editorial instructions in 11-10/1130r0 Approved in Sept 2010. Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  21. Tuesday AM1 Agenda • Meeting call to order • Modify and approve the agenda • Administrative items • Reminder and Call for essential patents • Team meetings • EMS/C: • V/RUR: • CKE: • REG: • Recess Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  22. Motion #2 • Approve Draft d0.06 • Draft d0.06 is the approved d0.05 with changes voted in Waikoloa and un-voted resolutions for the rest of the comments • Motion: To approve P802.11af draft d0.06 as the base for the P802.11af amendment • Moved by: • Seconded by: • Discussion on the motion? • Vote: Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  23. Motion #3 • Move: To accept 11-10/595r14 as the comment spreadsheet for d0.06 • Moved by: • Seconded by: • Discussion on the motion? • Vote: Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  24. Tuesday PM3 Agenda • Meeting call to order • Administrative items including IEEE IP statement • Modify and approve the agenda • IEEE 802.11af status • IEEE 802.19 status • IEEE 802.22 status • Open discussion on FCC 10-174 • Recess Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  25. Wednesday PM1&2 Agenda • Meeting call to order • Modify and approve the agenda • Administrative items • Reminder and Call for essential patents • Team meetings • EMS/C: • V/RUR: • CKE: • REG: • Recess Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  26. Thursday PM1 Agenda • Meeting call to order • Modify and approve the agenda • Administrative items • Reminder and Call for essential patents • Team meetings • EMS/C: • V/RUR: • CKE: • REG: • Recess Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  27. Thursday PM2 Agenda • Meeting call to order • Modify and approve the agenda • Administrative items • Reminder and Call for essential patents • Review results of team meetings • Vote to accept team solutions • Modify PPV/O • “It’s tough to make predictions, especially about the future.” - YB • Decide if we are ready to ask the Editor to create D1.0 • Plan for teleconferences and January meeting • Adjourn Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  28. Teleconferences • Weekly on Tuesdays • Time: xx:00 ET for 90 minutes Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  29. TGaf Timeline – Updated July 2010 • Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: November 2010 • Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot: January 2011 • Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: March 2011 • Initial Sponsor Ballot: May 2011 • Approved Sponsor Ballot: July 2011 • Final WG/EC Approval: November 2011 • RevCom/Standards Board Approval: December 2011 Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  30. Plans for Teleconferences and January • If draft cleanup was completed in November • Prepare and begin first WG letter ballot • Continue to review regulatory impact on TGaf • If draft cleanup was not completed in November • Complete the cleanup • Approve draft in Los Angeles and begin first WG letter ballot • Continue to review regulatory impact on TGaf Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  31. Any Other Business? • None heard • Motion to Adjourn • Moved by: • Seconded by: • Vote: Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  32. Process of Getting toLetter Ballot and Beyond Completed Steps | Future Steps • Adoption of PAR and 5 Criteria • Technical Presentations and Discussions • Specify Any Additional Requirements, Comparison Criteria, or Other Documents • Call For Proposals • Presentation of Proposals • Select from Submitted Complete Proposals to Produce a Draft • Refine Draft • Letter Ballot – November 2010 • Recirculation – January 2011 • Sponsor Ballot – March 2011 • Recirculation – May 2011 • Final WG/EC Approval – November 2011 • IEEE SB REVCOM Approval – December 2011 Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  33. 3 Cycles of Comments and Resolution Call for Informal Comments Comment Resolution WG Letter Ballot Comment Resolution, Recirculation Sponsor Ballot Comment Resolution, Recirculation Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  34. References • 11-09-0749-03-0000-802.11-in-the-tvws • IEEE Std 802.11-2007 IEEE Standard for Information Technology— Telecommunications and information exchange between systems— Local and metropolitan area networks— Specific requirements Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications • FCC 08-260 Second Report and Order and Memorandum and Order (http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-260A1.pdf) • 11-09-0934-09-tvws-par-nescom-form-plus-5c • 11-06-0056-00-0000-cbp-and-david-allens-methods • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Getting_Things_Done • 11-10-0021-06-00af-meeting-plan-and-agenda-los-angeles-2010 • 11-10-0210-08-000m-lb160-cid-2113-proposed-resolution • 11-10-0218-00-00af-draft-call-for-proposals • 11-10-0221-01-00af-feb-16-2010-teleconferenc-plan • 11-10-0226-00-00af-feb-16-telecon-minutes • 11-10-0238-03-00af-petere-amendment-proposal • 11-10-0248-01-00af-amendment-proposal-for-measurement-report Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  35. References [2] • 11-10-0253-01-00af-modification-on-dfs-and-dcf-procedure-adapting-to-fcc-rules-in-tvws-part-2-hidden-node • 11-10-0256-01-00af-modification-on-dfs-and-dcf-procedure-adapting-to-fcc-rules-in-tvws-part-1-synchronized-quiet • 11-10-0257-03-00af-regulatory-operating-classes-specifications • 11-10-0258-00-00af-mac-and-phy-proposal-for-802-11af • 11-10-0260-03-00af-radio-resource-measurement-type-and-procedure-for-tvws-application-under-fcc-rules • 11-10-0261-02-00af-enabling-procedure-of-communication-in-tvws-under-fcc-rules • 11-10-0262-01-00af-requirements-and-amendments-regarding-tvws-database-access • 11-10-0263-03-00af-amendment-proposal-for-tv-white-spaces-operation • 11-10-0288-00-00af-mar-9-2010-teleconferenc-plan • 11-10-0289-00-00af-summary-of-nict-fs-technical-proposals-for-tgaf • 11-10-0297-00-00af-march-9-teleconference-minutes Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  36. References [3] • 11-10-0299-02-00af-meeting-plan-and-agenda-orlando-2010 • 11-10-0405-00-00af-closing-report-orlando-2010 • 11-10-0428-00-00af-meeting-minutes-for-Orlando-2010 • 11-10-0447-01-00af-text-document-for-proposal-11-10-261 • 11-10-0448-01-00af-text-document-for-proposal-11-10-260 • 11-10-0449-03-00af-text-for-regulatory-operating-classes-specifications-proposal • 11-10-0437-01-00af-mar-30-2010-teleconferenc-plan-and-agenda • 11-10-0452-00-00af-march-30-teleconference-minutes • 11-10-0471-01-00af-apr-13-teleconference-plan-and-agenda • 11-10-0472-01-00af-normative-text-for-scanning-in-tv-whitespaces • 11-10-0475-00-00af-april-13-teleconference-minutes • 11-10-0481-01-00af-apr-27-teleconferenc-plan-and-agenda • 11-10-0512-00-00af-global-operating-channels • 11-10-0513-01-00af-relocating-3650mhz-enabling-signal • 11-10-0516-01-00af-april-27th-teleconference-minutes Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  37. References [4] • 11-10-0575-00-00af-May-11th-teleconference-minutes • 11-10-0576-00-00af-meeting-plan-and-agenda-beijing-2010 (this document) • 11-10-0595-09-00af-d0-02-comment-spreadsheet • 11-10-0608-00-00af-multi-block-ofdm-for-tvws-operation • 11-10-0633-00-00af-clause-20-changes-for-5-and-10-mhz-channel-widths-for-ht-operation • 11-10-0634-00-00af-annex-i-j-changes-considering-adjacent-channel-separation-requirement • 11-10-0635-00-00af-clause-7-changes-for-the-measurement-report-considering-adjacent-channel-separation-requirement • 11-10-0693-00-00af-jun-8-teleconference-plan-and-agenda • 11-10-0695-03-00af-normative-text-for-dse-measurement-reporting • 11-10-0700-00-00af-proposed-changes-related-to-frequency-tolerance-and-receiver-maximum-input-level • 11-10-0701-00-00af-June-8th-teleconference-minutes Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  38. References [5] • 11-10-0702-00-00af-jun-22-teleconference-plan-and-agenda • 11-10-0704-00-00af-comment-spreadsheet-with-proposed-resolution-on-phy-channelization • 11-10-0709-00-00af-normative-text-for-enablement-frame • 11-10-0710-01-00af-tv-band-and-multi-band-dse-procedures • 11-10-0711-02-00af-proposed-changes-regarding-to-dse-in-ieee-802-11af-d0-03 • 11-10-0712-03-00af-proposed-changes-regarding-measurement-in-ieee-802-11af-d0-02 • 11-10-0713-01-00af-comment-spreadsheet-with-proposed-resolution-on-enablement • 11-10-0718-00-00af-proposed-changes-related-to-dse-deenablement • 11-10-0719-00-00af-definitions-in-tvws • 11-10-0720-00-00af-tvws-enablement-scenarios • 11-10-0724-04-00af-normative-text-for-tvws-channel-enablement • 11-10-0731-00-00af-normative-text-for-dse-enablement-in-tv-white-space.doc Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  39. References [6] • 11-10-0737-03-00af-use-11u-gas-and-redefine-enabling-signal.doc • 11-10-0738-01-00af-jul-6-teleconference-plan-and-agenda.ppt • 11-10-0739-00-00af-normative-text-for-anqp-regulatory-domain-database-access.doc • 11-10-0746-01-00af-june-22th-teleconference-minutes.doc • 11-10-0757-01-00af-july-6th-teleconference-minutes.doc • 11-10-0767-01-00af-proposed-changes-related-to-dynamic-channel-power-management.doc • 11-10-0789-00-00af-comment-spreadsheet-with-proposed-resolution-on-map.xls • 11-10-0790-02-00af-normative-text-for-white-space-map.doc • 11-10-0812-01-00af-open-issues-in-tvws-enablement.ppt • 11-10-0813-01-00af-tvws-enablement-draft-text.doc • 11-10-0828-00-00af-normative-text-for-5-mhz-measurement-pilot-frame.doc • 11-10-0829-00-00af-normative-text-for-slot-time-synchronization.doc • 11-10-0852-00-00af-normative-text-for-tvws-sensing.doc Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  40. References [7] • 11-10-0877-00-00af.doc [this needs a name!] • 11-10-0908-00-00af-closing-report-san-diego-2010.ppt • 11-10-0945-00-00af-dse-status-query-response.doc • 11-10-0953-00-00af-san-diego-2010-meeting-minutes.doc • 11-10-0954-01-00af-july-27th-teleconference-plan-and-agenda.ppt • 11-10-0962-00-00af-august-3rd-teleconference-plan-and-agenda.ppt • 11-10-0971-01-00af-august-3rd-teleconference-minutes.doc • 11-10-0974-01-00af-august-10th-teleconference-plan-and-agenda.ppt • 11-10-0982-00-00af-july-27th-teleconference-minutes.doc • 11-10-0985-01-00af-august-17th-teleconference-plan-and-agenda.ppt • 11-10-0986-00-00af-august-10th-teleconference-minutes.doc • 11-10-0991-00-00af-alignment-of-RLQP-and-ANQP.ppt • 11-10-0994-01-00af-august-17th-teleconference-minutes.doc • 11-10-1000-01-00af-aug-24-teleconference-plan-and-agenda.ppt Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  41. References [8] • 11-10-1017-00-00af-august-24th-teleconference-minutes.doc • 11-10-1033-00-00af-11af-channel-numbering-comment-resolutions.doc • 11-10-1037-02-00af-normative-text-for-deployment-scenarios-and-signalling-methods-for-enablement.doc • 11-10-1040-02-00af-white-space-map-notification.doc • 11-10-1183-01-00af-hawaii-meeting-minutes.doc • 11-10-1185-01-00af-september-28-teleconference-plan-and-agenda.ppt • 11-10-1190-00-00af-802-11-summary-of-fcc-10-174-changes.doc • 11-10-1201-02-00af-october-12th-teleconference-plan-and-agenda.ppt • 11-10-1204-00-00af-october-19th-teleconference-plan-and-agenda.ppt • 11-10-1208-00-00af-Oct-12th-teleconference-minutes.doc • 11-10-1215-00-00af-october-19th-teleconference-minutes.doc Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

More Related