200 likes | 279 Views
Students learning together from video recorded professional practices. Enhancing the quality of online peer feedback. Janneke van der Hulst Els Scheringa VU University Amsterdam The Netherlands. The “cast” of the presentation …. Janneke van der Hulst. Els Scheringa. and virtual….
E N D
Students learning together from video recorded professional practices Enhancing the quality of online peer feedback Janneke van der Hulst Els Scheringa VU University Amsterdam The Netherlands
The “cast” of the presentation ….. Janneke van der Hulst Els Scheringa
and virtual….. Claudine Janneke Geursen Paul
Contents of the Presentation • Introduction (DiViDU and DiViDossier) • Exchange of visions and experiences in the Reflection Model • Demonstration: • student looking back with DiViDU • feedback on own behavior and peer feedback • Students’ evaluation • Teacher’s evaluation • Special focus on (online) feedback
Introduction (DiViDU and DiViDossier) DiViDU: Online Learning Environment Using streaming video Some of the advantages we expected: Time and place independent learning In-depth learning through repetitive reflection Collecting feedback from different perspectives
One of our first experiments with DiViDU Stimulate the use of English in the lessons. • http://dividu.du.nl
Looking back lloo Demonstration: student looking back in DiViDU Looking back Motivation of the selection by Claudine
What did students say about DiViDU? • The selection of critical moments of a lesson were very helpful • It was fascinating to get a glimpse of peers in ’real practice’ • Feedback most helpful when teacher or peers ask reflective questions • Giving online feedback is time-consuming
Teacher’s evaluation • The description of the task is very critical. • Students generally make no link between sources/theory and picture. • For diverse feedback peers should give feedback before tutors do. • Students frequently ask for tips and tricks in stead of feedback
Feedback: open feedback (vs. pre-structured) • Students formulate personal feedback questions • Peers construct own answers • Students may ask for clarification of feedback
Face-to-face feedback Verbal and non-verbal communication Two-way interaction with direct response Transitory feedback Online feedback Verbal (written) Well-considered feedback Feedback collected from different persons Recorded for future reference Face-to-face feedback vs. online feedback Therefore: Suitable to care for personal experience, emotional release, etc. Therefore:: Suitable for in-depth analysis of a situation, for linking practical situations to theoretical concepts, etc.
Some guidelines for instuctors: • Organize feedback process carefully • Communicate expectations explicitly • Moderate feedback process actively • Give feedback after peers have given feedback
Contents of feedback in DiViDU • Students find it difficult to pose feedback questions • Students tend to ask for advice • Students tend to depart from video • Students hardly refer to theory • Differences in feedback: • Students’ feedback: offering peer support • Teachers’ feedback: containing reference to theoretical concepts • Students can not question their blind spot
Re-thinking the value of online feedback Learning task is more focussed • on interaction shown on the video • toward theory Feedback criteria-led: use of rubrics
DiViDossier • Overzicht van Paul laten zienl
Thank you for being with us! Further information: e.scheringa@ond.vu.nl j.vanderhulst@ond.vu.nl