1 / 15

Joint IO Task Analysis Advancing IO Force Development The overall classification of this brief is Unclassified

Joint IO Task Analysis Advancing IO Force Development The overall classification of this brief is Unclassified. Ms. Jocelyn Bundrum JS J7 JCW 757 203-7869. Purpose. Provide a summary of the IO task analysis effort in support of Information Operations Force Development Background

salaam
Download Presentation

Joint IO Task Analysis Advancing IO Force Development The overall classification of this brief is Unclassified

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Joint IO Task AnalysisAdvancing IO Force DevelopmentThe overall classification of this brief is Unclassified Ms. Jocelyn Bundrum JS J7 JCW 757 203-7869

  2. Purpose Provide a summary of the IO task analysis effort in support of Information Operations Force Development • Background • Task Overview • Results / Findings • Proposed Way Ahead UNCLASSIFIED

  3. UNCLASSIFIED Background • 31 Aug 2010 – Joint IO Force Optimization Study (JIOFOS) documented that IO professionals operating in joint commands are inadequately trained and educated • 25 January 2011 – SecDef memorandum directed CJCS to evaluate joint IO training & education to ensure CCMD requirements are met • March 2011 - Joint Training Integration Group for IO (JTIG-IO): • 5 March 2011 - Documented IO community top five training priorities for FY 12 – Joint IO Planning ranked #1 • 30 March 2011 - Identified collective/individual tasks have not been defined for joint IO • September 2011 - OSD(P) sponsored analysis to support documenting individual and collective tasks “In their communication with me, Combatant Commanders continue to stress the lack of adequately-trained IO personnel.” SecDef, 25 Jan 2011 UNCLASSIFIED

  4. UNCLASSIFIED OVERVIEW Task/Purpose/Objective: Document joint IO collective and individual tasks and supporting knowledge, skills and attitudes (KSAs) in order to establish joint IO task standards to be used for standardization and alignment of Joint IO workforce training and education requirements Methodology: • Discovery • OPLANS / CONPLANS / Org Charts / Policy / UJTL / JMETL / Doctrine / DRRS / JLLS / JTS • Documentation/Analysis • Surveys, Interviews and / or observations • Validation of captured tasks • Tasks reviewed by 9 CCMD and JIOWC • Population Dynamics: • 49SurveyRespondents – 63% Mil, 19% Civ, 18% Contr • 64 Verbal Job Interviews • 9 Work Observations during CCMD Exercises • IOWG, JCMB, JTWG, CIWG, CUA, OPT, JPG, etc. Oct Nov Dec Jan 12 Feb Mar Apr May Jul Aug Sep Jun Sep 11 Final report AFRICOM ISAF JIOWC CENTCOM Initiate IO Task Analysis Discovery Phase EUCOM SOUTHCOM PACOM AFGHANISTAN RETURNEE Validation of Tasks via JSAP SOCOM JTF HOA 4 OSD(P) funded, Joint Staff J7 & J39/JIOWC managed, Scientific Research Corporation contracted UNCLASSIFIED

  5. UNCLASSIFIED Results Results: Initial Joint IO Standards • Documented 73 IO Task statements with Performance Measures (metric criteria) • 25 Collective Tasks subordinate to UJTs - ST 5.5.1 (Coordinate Theater IO) , ST 5.5.4, (Plan Trans-regional or Cross-core IO Capabilities) and ST 7.1.1 (Provide OPLANS) • 48 Individual Tasks • Validated tasks– All CCMDs reviewed the data and concurred these were the tasks they performed • 189 comments - only 14 adjudicated without work beyond scope of this study • Aligned KSA’s to task based on current references/ guidance Recommendation: • Align Service and joint IO training and education to CCMD requirements through: • Continued refinement of Tasks / Standards • Increased fidelity of measurement criteria • Evaluate individual joint IO training • Assess organizational joint IO readiness (e.g. JTIMS, DRRS) • Provide quantitative standards for Joint Course Certification • Analysis of training gaps • Improved policy • Development of a Work Force optimization strategy UNCLASSIFIED

  6. UNCLASSIFIED Results Results: Joint IO Roles • Documented 27 specific IO roles w/associated competencies • Competencies mapped to roles, establishing the relationship between the roles performing the tasks and competencies necessary for performance • Observed five IO related functions (Planning, Targeting, Operations, Training, Watch Officer) Recommendation: • Establish definedjoint IO work roles (i.e., IO Chief, IO Planner, IO assessor, IO targeteer, IO trainer, IO program manager (e.g. Voice) by mapping documented roles to observed functions • Aid in the identification of shortfalls in capability function, manpower, personnel, and training • Refine billet/position descriptions and/or joint individual qualification task list* • Adjust policy • Influence a work force optimization strategy *CJCSM 3500.03C JOINT TRAINING MANUAL FOR THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES, 15 Jan 2011 UNCLASSIFIED

  7. UNCLASSIFIED Key Finding Finding: Disunion between current manpower, personnel and training policy* and practice based on respondent population** MILDEC Only 21% • 67% of respondents listed no formal training • 63% of the current workforce falls under manpower, personnel, and training (MP&T) policy • 65% of interviewees were occupationally appropriate by MP&T policy • No respondents met all requirements of the Joint IO Force for MP&T policy • <41% of the interviewees were assigned to eJMAPS billets requiring joint IO education and training • 10% of respondents were JIOPC trained • No respondents were IO GLE graduates OPSEC Only 2% JIOPC & MILDEC 6% MILDEC Only 21% No Formal Training 67% JIOPC Only 4 % * DODD 3600.01, CJCSM 1630.01 **Statistics here represent a sample size of forty-nine respondents UNCLASSIFIED

  8. UNCLASSIFIED Advancing IO Force Development Way Ahead Recommendations: • Continue refinement of Tasks / Standards • Adjudicate CCMD comments outside the scope of the study ( refine the “As Is”) • Further analyses (identify the “To Be”) • Increase fidelity of measurement criteria • Evaluate/assess effectiveness of updated training / readiness / certification • Analysis of training gaps • Course content mapping • Implement Force Development training/education changes • Improve policy • Incorporate, as appropriate, into Doctrine & Policy (Training / Education / Force Management) • Development of a Work Force optimization strategy • Recommend overall training concept/COAs IOT enhance Joint IO work force development & professionalization Inform the IOFD Summitand support IOFD way ahead decisions/actions 8 UNCLASSIFIED

  9. UNCLASSIFIED Proposed Timeline Refine Task List 15 Feb 13 Improved Measurement Criteria Training Gaps Analysis JFCOM/JS J7 IO Training Studies KSA Final Brief Recommend Overall Training Concept Update Training Requirements/ Standards* Improved Doctrine and Policy JIOFOS SecDef MEMO KSA Study Conclusion Implement Approved Concept Evaluate/Assess Updated Training IOFD Summit Apr13 Optimize Work Force Development NOTES * - AO Level Product from IOFD Summit Apr2013 9 UNCLASSIFIED

  10. Discussion

  11. Backup

  12. UNCLASSIFIED Develop Commander’s Estimate UNCLASSIFIED

  13. UNCLASSIFIED Develop Rules of Engagement (ROE) Supplement UNCLASSIFIED

  14. UNCLASSIFIED Develop Targets in support of IO Concept of Support UNCLASSIFIED

  15. UNCLASSIFIED Develop MOE UNCLASSIFIED

More Related