310 likes | 479 Views
CHAPTER EIGHTEEN. EARNINGS. STOCK VALUATION BASED ON EARNINGS. THE DIVIDEND V EARNINGS CONTROVERSY How important is the dividend decision made by management?. THE DIVIDEND V EARNINGS CONTROVERSY. Miller & Modigliani (M&M) argue that the underlying source of value for a share is earnings.
E N D
CHAPTER EIGHTEEN EARNINGS
STOCK VALUATION BASED ON EARNINGS • THE DIVIDEND V EARNINGS CONTROVERSY • How important is the dividend decision made by management?
THE DIVIDEND V EARNINGS CONTROVERSY • Miller & Modigliani (M&M) argue that the underlying source of value for a share is earnings
THE DIVIDEND V. EARNINGS CONTROVERSY • M&M: the dividend decision is relatively unimportant
THE DOLLAR AMOUNT OF A FIRM’S INVESTMENT • has two flows • the stream of expected earnings • the expected net investment required to produce such earnings
THE DOLLAR AMOUNT OF A FIRM’S INVESTMENT • earnings are exactly equal to dividends and investment E = D + I
THE DOLLAR AMOUNT OF A FIRM’S INVESTMENT • earnings are exactly equal to dividends and investment E = D + I unless E < D + I
THE DOLLAR AMOUNT OF A FIRM’S INVESTMENT • which implies the firm obtained additional funds such as from the sale of stocks
THE DOLLAR AMOUNT OF A FIRM’S INVESTMENT • ISSUING STOCK • rather than debt ( which increases the D/E ratio), stock allows greater dividends to the stockholders
THE DIVIDEND DECISION • WHAT LEVEL OF DIVIDENDS WILL MAKE THE CURRENT STOCKHOLDERS BETTER OFF?
THE DIVIDEND DECISION • EXAMPLE: • Consider Mr. Jones who ownes 1% of a firm A’s common stock • Assume the firm follows the policy E = D + I • then, Jones dividend = .01D
THE DIVIDEND DECISION • EXAMPLE: • Consider Mr. Jones who ownes 1% of a firm A’s common stock • But: if the firm follows the other policy E < D + I Jones must invest additional funds to maintain his 1% ownership in Firm A
THE DIVIDEND DECISION • EXAMPLE: • Let F = the additional funding obtained by the firm E + F = D + I • then .01F is required. • Implication: the amount of the extra cash dividend is exactly offset by the amount Jones needs to spend to maintain his 1% ownership in Firm A.
THE DIVIDEND DECISION • EXAMPLE: • but if the firm follow the policy E > D + I Jones must sell back stock to the firm or else end up with more than 1% ownership • Key Idea: • No matter what the firm’s dividend policy, Jones is still able to spend the same amount on consumption
THE DIVIDEND DECISION • EARNINGS DETERMINE MARKET VALUE • the aggregate market value of equity is equal to • Present Value of expected earnings • less investment (E - I) • the size of the dividend is not important • market value of stock is independent of the dividend decision and • related to earnings prospects of the firm
DETERMINANTS OF DIVIDENDS • DIVIDEND POLICY • most firms keep dollar amount of dividends constant over time • larger earnings may increase dividends
DETERMINANTS OF DIVIDENDS • DIVIDEND POLICY • Lintner Model: • models behavior implied by a constant long-run target payout ratio of dividends
DETERMINANTS OF DIVIDENDS • DIVIDEND POLICY • Lintner Model: • Let P = payout ratio goal of the firm • total dividends paid in year t is D = p * E where D is the target dividends in year t E is the amount of earnings annually
DETERMINANTS OF DIVIDENDS • DIVIDEND POLICY • Lintner Model: • the larger the current earnings, the larger the change in dividends, but • the larger the previous period’s dividends, the smaller the change in dividends
THE INFORMATION CONTENT OF DIVIDENDS • DIVIDEND CHANGES MAY BE A SIGNALING DEVICE • Signaling • an increase means management is optimistic about future earnings • investors raise their earnings expectations
THE INFORMATION CONTENT OF DIVIDENDS • DIVIDEND CHANGES MAY BE A SIGNALING DEVICE • changes in dividends may be more important that the level of dividends decision
PRICE TO EARNINGS RATIOS • HISTORICAL RECORD • ratio varies individually on a year to year basis • general trend • for the S&P 500 both EPS and prices show general increases over time • EPS and prices do not parallel each other
PRICE TO EARNINGS RATIOS • HISTORICAL RECORD • Permanent and Transitory Components of Earnings • reported total earnings may two components: • transitory: the increase or decrease is not repeated • permanent: means the change may be ongoing
PRICE TO EARNINGS RATIOS • transitory: the increase or decrease is not repeated • varies in size from negative to positive • leads to a range of different P/E ratios over time • not correlated to a stock’s intrinsic value
PRICE TO EARNINGS RATIOS • permanent: means the change may be ongoing • changes over time and investors revise their forecasts • leading to change in stock price • leading to change in the P/E ratio • therefore, the P/E ratio varies over time • correlated to the stock’s intrinsic value
PRICE TO EARNINGS RATIOS • permanent: means the change may be ongoing • over time P/E ratios tend to revert to an average ratio for the whole market
RELATIVE GROWTH RATES OF A FIRM’S EARNINGS • EARNINGS GROWTH RATES • Historically • no reliable predictor of future growth • annual reported earnings follow a random walk • quarterly earnings may have a seasonal component
EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENTS AND PRICE CHANGES • ANNOUNCEMENTS • stock prices tend to correctly anticipate earnings announcements beforehand • prices react correctly but not fully afterward • prices continue to move in a direction similar to their initial reaction for sever months afterward
EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENTS AND PRICE CHANGES • ANNOUNCEMENTS • analysts do better than sophisticated mechanical models in forecasting • analysts tend to overestimate when forecasting