440 likes | 643 Views
MFIX Overview. M. Syamlal, Fluent, Inc. Federal Energy Technology Center Morgantown , WV 26507-0880. Outline. Multiphase Theory Validation Studies Bubbling Fluidized Bed Circulating Fluidized Bed Turbulent Gas-solids Jet Carbonizer Gasifier Application. Multiphase Theory.
E N D
MFIX Overview M. Syamlal, Fluent, Inc. Federal Energy Technology Center Morgantown , WV 26507-0880
Outline • Multiphase Theory • Validation Studies • Bubbling Fluidized Bed • Circulating Fluidized Bed • Turbulent Gas-solids Jet • Carbonizer • Gasifier Application
Multiphase Formulation • Two Phases • Three phases Fluid Solids Fluid Char Solids - 1 Solids - 2 Coal
Multiphase Formulation • Details of flow field and particle interaction have been averaged out. • Account for the information lost due to averaging -constitutive equations • Constitutive equations specify how the phases interact with themselves and with each other1 1. Drew and Lahey (1993)
Momentum Equation • Interaction within the phase - stresses • collisions, sliding or rolling friction • electrostatic, van der Waals, capillary
Momentum Equation Interaction between phases - interphase forces
Momentum Equation Interactions with rest of the universe - body forces
Energy Balance originates from a work term for e changes
Energy Balance Viscous dissipation
Energy Balance Energy sources; e.g..., radiation
Energy Balance heat conduction
Energy Balance Interphase heat transfer
Energy Balance Energy transfer with mass transfer
Species Mass Balance • Multiphase chemical reactions are described by tracking chemical species in each of the phases
Fluidized Bed with Jet • Gidaspow (1994)1 • 500 & 800 mm sand (2610 kg/m3) • Jet velocities: 3.5, 5.77, 9.88 m/s • 2D bed with a central jet • 0.39 m width x 0.58 m height • 124 x 108 cells a 1. Sec.7.8.1; Syamlal (1997)
Bubble Size and Shape Gidaspow (1994) Fig. 7.10
Bubble Size and Shape Gidaspow (1994) Fig. 7.11
Voidage Contourstime average 3.55 m/s 5.77 m/s Data - Gidaspow, Lin, and Seo (1983)
Centerline Voidagetime average Data -- Gidaspow and Ettehadieh (1983)
Bubble Rise Velocity Rowe and Partridge (1962), Davidson and Harrison (1963), Syamlal and O’Brien (1989)
Uniform Fluidization • Halow and Nicoletti (1992) • 700 mm plastic (1460 kg/m3) • Uniform flow 1.04 Umf -air • 3D cylindrical bed • 0.15 m diameter x 0.25 m height • 30 x 100 x 16 cells a
Bubble PropertiesAverage of 9 bubbles Data -- Halow and Nicoletti (1992)
Bubble Rise Velocity Data -- Halow and Nicoletti (1992)
Gas + solids Solids Gas Circulating Fluidized Bed • Bader, Findlay, and Knowlton (1988) • 76 mm FCC catalyst (1714 kg/m3) • Solids flux: 98 and 147 kg/m2.s • Vg0 : 3.7 - 9.1 m/s • 0.305 m dia x 12.20 m height • 2-D, cyl., 12 x 240 cells O’Brien and Syamlal (1993)
Pressure Drop Across CFB Data -- Bader et al. (1988)
Solids Distribution in Riser Data -- Bader et al. (1988)
Carbonizer Model • Froehlich et al. (1994) • 550 mm coal and sorbent particles • 1207 K, 1034 kPa • axisymmetric cylindrical coordinates • Flows (kg/s): coal- 0.044; sorb- 0.01; air - 0.1; N2- 0.028; Steam - 0.007 • 0.36 max dia x 10.36 m height • 16 x 132 cells Product gas Coal, sorbent, air and steam a Syamlal et al. (1996)
Carbonizer Chemistry H2O CO + H2O WCO2 + H2 Ash coal CO2 + H2O + CO + CH4 + H2 +Tar sorbent Moisture CaO CaCO3 CO2 Volatile Matter CaMg(CO3)2 O2 MgO CO2 + H2O Fixed Carbon H2 O2 O2 CO CH4 CO2 + H2O + CO + CH4 + H2 + Fixed Carbon CO2 CO2 H2O H2 + CO
Temperature Distribution Syamlal et al. (1996)
SynGas Composition Syamlal et al. (1996)
PyGASJ Gasifier air • Novel gasifier1;1200 K, 4130 kPa • 2120 mm coal and sorbent • axisymmetric cylindrical coordinates • Flows (kg/s): coal+sorb- 1.8; air: pyro - 2.6, top - 0.9, grate- 2.9 • 2.0 max dia x 8.2 m height • 39 x 165 cells fuel gas ash air + Steam air+coal a 1. Sadowski (1992)
Gas Temperature • Scale: Red - Blue 300 - 1500 K • Upper Zone Flame (~1800 K) • Stable flame at the riser bottom (~1600 K)
Coal Mass Fraction • Scale: Red - Blue 0.0 - 0.05 g/cc • Coal conversion to char completes in the pyrolyzer
CO Mass Fraction • Scale: Red - Blue 0.0 - 0.2 • CO and CH4 concentrations are low in hot regions • Nonuniform CO distribution in the packed bed
Tar Mass Fraction • Scale: Red - Blue 0.0 - 0.003 • Coal devolatilization is completed 20 ft above the inlet • Tar cracking is completed in the pyrolyzer
Other Results • Information on gas and solids flow patterns • Cannot maintain a tall coflow bed • No regions where coal agglomerate Char particles Sticky coal particle (350-500o C)
It is far better to foresee even without certainty than not to foresee at all. - Henri Poincare