1 / 14

Observable effects of gauge flavor dynamics

Observable effects of gauge flavor dynamics. J . Hošek, in “Strong Coupling Gauge Theories in LHC Era”, World Scientific 2011 ( arXiv: 0909.0629 ) P. Beneš, J. Hošek, A. Smetana, arXiv: 1101.3456 A. Smetana, arXiv.1104.1935. Plan of the talk.

sally
Download Presentation

Observable effects of gauge flavor dynamics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Observable effects of gauge flavor dynamics J. Hošek, in “Strong Coupling Gauge Theories in LHC Era”, World Scientific 2011 (arXiv: 0909.0629) P. Beneš, J. Hošek, A. Smetana, arXiv: 1101.3456 A. Smetana, arXiv.1104.1935

  2. Plan of the talk • Dynamical mass generation by gauge SU(3)f (f=1,2,3) flavor dynamics. Having just one free parameter (gauge coupling h or the scale Λ) it is either right or plainly wrong. Reliable computation of the spectrum is, however, a formidable task. • Rigidity of the model provides bona fide testable firm predictions due to symmetries: • 9 sterile νR for anomaly freedom – new global U(3) sterility symmetry • Dynamics implies 12 massive Majorana neutrinos (3 active) • There is the massless composite Nambu-Goldstone majoron • There is the light Weinberg-Wilczek axion

  3. We pretend to replace the Higgs sector with its ‘twenty-some’ parameters by gauge flavor dynamics (g.f.d.). For anomaly freedom there must be 3 triplets of νR : New global U(3)S=U(1)S x SU(3)Ssterility symmetry. Theory is AF but not vector-like (not QCD-like)

  4. QCD and electroweak SU(2)L x U(1)Y can be introduced at will by gauging in Lf the corresponding indices of chiral fermion fields and by adding the corresponding pure gauge terms. • GLOBAL SYMMETRIES • Gauge and global non-Abelian symmetries tie together different chiral fermion fields. Only 6 Abelian symmetries corresponding to 6 common phases of lL, νsR, eR, qL, uR, dR survive. • 6-1=5: U(1)Y is gauged. 5 global Abelian U(1) currents generated by B, B5, L, L5, S charges are classically conserved for massless fermions. • There are 4 distinct gauge forces, hence 4 distinct anomalies. • Therefore, one current remains exactly conserved at quantum level: B-(L+S) • Divergences of linear combinations of remaining 4 currents can be ordered according to strengths of anomalies

  5. We argue that g.f.d. completely self-breaks: At low momenta g.f.d. is strongly coupled and lepton, quark and flavor gluon masses are generated. There must be, unlike in QCD, the nontrivial non-perturbative fixed point. • Chirality changing fermion self energy Σ(p2) is a R-L bridge : all important • Fermion mass is then the position of the pole of the full fermion propagator, m=Σ(p2=m2). • If different fermion masses are generated, the ‘would-be’ composite NG bosons of completely broken S(U3) f give rise to the flavor gluon masses. There should be also other (massive) bound states. • FCNC by flavor gluons imply MC~106 GeV. • Arbitrary smallness of fermion masses is attributed to the proximity of the fixed point. • Knowledge of at low momenta is the necessity.

  6. Momentum-dependent sliding coupling and non-perturbative IR fixed point • In PT • For П~ln q 2 we get the formula of asymptotic freedom • For П=M2/q2 we get the massive gluon propagator (Schwinger mechanism). • For q2 -> 0 we get erroneously zero. • We suggest to use • Postulate at low momenta : the way to the fixed point is matrix-fold

  7. Charged fermion mass generation • Poor guy illustration • With M=106 GeV the ‘neutrino’ mass mν=10-9 GeV is obtained for hν=2π/15 ln 10 ~ 0.18 and the ‘top quark’ mass mt=102 GeV is obtained for ht=2π/4 ln 10 ~ 0.68. • All masses related

  8. Neutrino mass (Majorana) generation canonical warm dark matter candidate

  9. Intermediate boson mass generation • Fermion proper self energies Σ break spontaneously also the ‘vertical’ SU(2)LxU(1)Y . Schwinger mechanism at work: • WT identities, ‘would-be’ NG bosons, … • No generic Fermi (electroweak) scale-remnant of the top quark mass

  10. Spontaneously broken global symmetries: generic predictions(We assume that there are nontrivial solution Σ with no accidental symmetries) • Spontaneously broken by fermion self energies Σ

  11. Massless Abelian majoron J • Exact anomaly free U(1) B-(L+S)is spontaneously broken by Σν • There is a massless neutrino-composite majoron • For interaction strength weak enough no phenomenological danger : exchange of massless NG boson leads only to a spin-dependent tensor potential with a 1/r3 fall off • BUT: If there are neutrino oscillations, there is the classical majoron field ! (L. Bento, Z. Berezhiani)

  12. Weinberg-Wilczek axion a • Symmetry generated by B5-4S or B5-(L5-L) has QCD anomaly (i.e. is explicitly broken) and is spontaneously broken by both lepton and quark masses • Canonical dark matter candidate • Axion mass is ma ~ mπ fπ / Λg.f.d. • Invisibility requires Λg.f.d. > 106 TeV

  13. Conclusions • One free parameter: Either right or plainly wrong • Hard to solve (1st Weinberg’s law: “You will get nowhere by churning equations.” ) • Nobody knows how to put the model on the lattice • Dynamical (shining or dark) mass generation (all masses in principle related) • Fixed neutrino pattern • Massless NG majoron • Fixed pattern of pseudo-Goldstone bosons • Find other robust low-energy manifestation(s) of the model ???

More Related