1 / 39

Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008. Leigh Manasevit Brustein & Manasevit 3105 South Street NW Washington, DC 20007 (202) 965- 3652 www.bruman.com lmanasevit@bruman.com. Response to Intervention . How it may be part of a federal program.

sammy
Download Presentation

Response to I n tervention (rti) MASfps Lansing, Michigan November, 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Response to Intervention (rti)MASfpsLansing, MichiganNovember, 2008 Leigh Manasevit Brustein & Manasevit 3105 South Street NW Washington, DC 20007 (202) 965- 3652 www.bruman.com lmanasevit@bruman.com

  2. Response to Intervention How it may be part of a federal program

  3. Response to Intervention-RTI- What is it? What are the implications for Federal Fund expenditures?

  4. RTI: What Is It? • Early intervention though a tiered model to provide appropriate instruction • Utilization of scientific research based instructional techniques • Decision making based on the response to the intervention

  5. RTI: What Does It Do? • Predicts At Risk students • Provides early and individualized research based interventions • May avoid over identification as disabled

  6. RTI: Generally Structured into Tiers Tier 3 Specialized Highly Individualized Intervention (Instruction) At Risk LD & SLD-More Intense Support Identifies Students who do not respond to intervention of Tier 2 and refers to Tier 3 Tier 2 General Education Program-predicts At Risk Students for Tier 2 Tier 1

  7. RTI – Implications for Federal Funds • WRONG – Can I use federal funds to pay for RTI? • RIGHT – Can RTI be an allowable part of a federally funded program?

  8. Examples of Federal Programs Where RTI Might Fit: • IDEA • NCLB Title I, Part A • Title III

  9. RTI IDEA • Early Intervening Services (EIS) (15% LEA Grant) • Voluntary unless significant dis-proportionality

  10. RTI • EIS-Eligible Student • K-12 (Emphasis on K-3) who are not currently identified as IDEA eligible, but who need additional academic and behavioral support

  11. RTI • RTI for EIS eligible students • Additional Behavior / Education Support Success Evaluation for IDEA

  12. RTI IDEA • LEA flow through funds (not EIS funds) eligible students – identified as IDEA Eligible (have IEPs) • Eligible uses (services) special education and related services consistent with IEP • Question: Are the RTI services part of IEP?

  13. RTI NCLB Title I, Part A • WRONG - Can I use Title I funds to pay for RTI? • RIGHT – Can RTI be part of a Title I, Part A program?

  14. RTI in Title I, Part A Programs Title I, Part A programs • Targeted Assistance • Schoolwide

  15. RTI Title I, Part A • Targeted Assistance • Title I services only for eligible students

  16. Targeted Assistance Schools (TAS) • Must identify eligible students: • Students failing, or most at risk of failing, to meet the state’s challenging student academic achievement standards • Migrant • Neglected and Delinquent • Homeless • Head Start, Even Start, Early Reading First

  17. TAS Eligibility • Identifying eligible students: • Multiple, educationally related, objective criteria developed by LEA • If preschool-grade 2, judgment of teacher, interviews with parents, and other developmentally appropriate means • Eligibility is not based on poverty

  18. Components of TAS • Use resources to help ID’d students • Incorporate into existing planning • Effective methods and instructional strategies based on scientifically based research • Extended learning time • Accelerated, high quality curriculum • Minimize removal from classroom during regular hours • Does RTI fit here?

  19. Components of TAS (cont.) • Coordinate with regular ed program • Highly qualified teachers • Professional development • Parental involvement • Coordinate with other federal, state, and local services and programs

  20. Schoolwide • Consolidate federal, state, and local funds to upgrade the entire educational program • Except Reading First • Ensure all children meet standards, particularly those most at risk • Requirement: • 40% poverty • Schoolwide plan

  21. Schoolwide Flexibility • Exemption from program requirements • Not IDEA • Other exceptions (health, safety, parental) • Must meet “intents and purposes” of program – Does RTI meet intents and purposes of any of the consolidated programs? • Not required to ID particular children or provide only extra services

  22. Components of SWP One year planning period 1. Needs assessment 2. Schoolwide reform strategies that: a. Increase the amount & quality of learning time (extended year, before- and after-school) b. Address needs of all, but particularly low-achieving

  23. Components of SWP (cont.) 3. Instruction by “highly qualified” teachers 4. Professional development 5. Strategies to attract high quality teachers 6. Parental involvement 7. Transition from pre-school 8. Include teachers in assessment decisions 9. Timely, effective additional assistance 10. Coordination and integration Is RTI part of the schoolwide program?

  24. Heightened Federal Monitoring on SWP • OIG monitoring: • Description of how school implement components • Description of how school will use resources to implement • List of SEA and LEA programs and other federal programs that will be consolidated • Description of how school will provide individual academic assessments results in language parent can understand, including interpretations of results

  25. Close attention to plan development requirements: • Developing over one-year period • Developed with involvement of parents and other members of the community, including teachers, principals, administrators, etc • In effect for duration of school’s participation • Available to LEA, parents, and the public in understandable and uniform format • If appropriate developed in coordination with RF, ERF, Even Start, Perkins, and Head Start

  26. Title III • Can RTI be a part of a Title III program? • What are allowable activities? • Increasing student academic achievement • Effective instructional strategies • Intensified instruction

  27. Title III • Who are eligible Title III students? • Limited English Proficient Students

  28. General Considerations RTI • Scientifically Based Research – instructional or other methodologies paid in Federal Funds – must be based on scientifically Based Research

  29. RTI General Considerations Supplement NOT Supplant • EIS • LEA Flow Through • Title I Targeted Assistance • Title I Schoolwide

  30. RTI General Supplement NOT Supplant Presume supplanting in 3 situations: • Used federal funds to provide services the SEA or LEA is required to make available under other federal, state or local laws • Used federal funds to provide services the SEA or LEA provided with state or local funds in the prior year • Some programs (IDEA, Title V) will presume if used other federal funds in the prior year

  31. RTI General Supplement NOT Supplant Used Title I, Part A or Migrant Education Program (MEP) funds to provide the same services to Title I or MEP students that the LEA or SEA provides with state or local funds to nonparticipating students

  32. RTI General Supplement NOT Supplant IDEA • EIS – must supplement any ESEA EIS services [34 CFR 226(e)] • No supplement not supplant requirement for state/local funds [34 CFR 208 (a)]

  33. RTI General Supplement NOT Supplant IDEA • Flow Through Rules • Normal non-supplant apply • Caution – remember IDEA non-supplant INCLUDES Federal

  34. RTI General Supplement NOT Supplant Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance • Must be a Supplemental Service • Must be a Supplement Expenditure

  35. RTI General Supplement NOT Supplant • NOT A – • Modified B - • The LEA must ensure that the SW gets all the State and local funds it would have received were it not a Title I SW school. (E-18 February 2008 Fiscal Guidance http://www.ed.gov/programs/titleiparta/fiscalguid.doc)

  36. RTI General Supplement NOT Supplant • Title III • Supplement State, Local andFederal Funds

  37. Supplant Caution Cannot Provide Title I Schools with Title I Funded Services If Non-Title I Get Same Services (Limited Exception Only)

  38. Questions???

  39. This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice or a legal service.  This presentation does not create a client-lawyer relationship with Brustein & Manasevit and, therefore, carries none of the protections under the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct.  Attendance at this presentation, a later review of any printed or electronic materials, or any follow-up questions or communications arising out of this presentation with any attorney at Brustein & Manasevit does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit.  You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances.

More Related