180 likes | 293 Views
AE Senior Thesis 2010 Buffalo State College Science Building – Phase 1 Marie Ostrowski - Lighting/Electrical - April 14, 2010. INTRODUCTION. Project Overview College within the State University of New York system School of Natural and Social Sciences
E N D
AE Senior Thesis2010 Buffalo State CollegeScience Building – Phase 1 Marie Ostrowski - Lighting/Electrical - April 14, 2010
INTRODUCTION • Project Overview • College within the State University of New York system • School of Natural and Social Sciences • New Science Building Phase 1 Addition - 96,000 ft2 • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • Criteria: • Maintain Architect’s theme + Design Intent • Establish energy consumption/savings • Evaluate alternative motor controller arrangement Buffalo State College BSC Campus source: www.maps.google.com N Courtesy of Cannon Design source: www.buffalostate.edu
LIGHTING DEPTH pts • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary Director’s Office * Genetics Teaching Lab Facade Atrium *Not presented
LIGHTING DEPTH – WORKING SPACE GENETICS TEACHING LAB F13 F14 F15 F16 F17 • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • Goals • Flexible, efficient space • Criteria • LPD ≤ 1.4 W/ft2 • 50 fc at task plane (36”) • Uniformity at Task Surfaces • Materials: Furniture Flooring Walls Ceiling
LIGHTING DEPTH – WORKING SPACE 2) 1 ) • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • Performance: • LPD = 1.29W/ft2 • Maximum ceiling luminance = 550 cd/m2 2 ) 3) 2 ) Average Illuminance: 33.75 fcSwitched Ambient, Board + Perimeter On 3) Average Illuminance: 22.98 fcSwitched Ambient, Board On Average Illuminance: 52.64 fcAll ambient and perimeter on
LIGHTING DEPTH – OUTDOOR SPACE FACADE L1 F11 F12 • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • Goals • Expose interior corridor walls, create depth with varying light levels • Criteria • LPD : • 30 W/lin. Ft. (Entrance) • 1 W/lin. Ft. (Walkway) • 0.2 W/sq. ft (Façade) • 5fc at the entrance and walkway • Materials: • Alternating aluminum and clear glass panels
LIGHTING DEPTH – OUTDOOR SPACE • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • Performance: • LPD complies with 26W to spare considering the 5% unrestricted allowance • Average walkway illuminance 3.7fc
LIGHTING DEPTH – ATRIUM atrium F6 F7 F8 M1 • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • Goals • Highlight height of space, create a sense of movement, mimic rectilinear geometries • Criteria • LPD : • 0.6 W/ft2 (Level 1) • 0.5 W/ft2 (Level 2 + 3) • Horizontal Illuminance: 10fc • Materials: A B A B Existing Walls Corridor Walls Ceiling Floor/Accent Wall
LIGHTING DEPTH – ATRIUM atrium F6 F7 F8 M1 • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • Goals • Highlight height of space, create a sense of movement, mimic rectilinear geometries • Criteria • LPD : • 0.6 W/ft2 (Level 1) • 0.5 W/ft2 (Level 2 + 3) • Horizontal Illuminance: 10fc • Materials: A B A B Existing Walls Corridor Walls Ceiling Floor/Accent Wall
LIGHTING DEPTH – ATRIUM atrium F6 F7 F8 M1 • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • Goals • Highlight height of space, create a sense of movement, mimic rectilinear geometries • Criteria • LPD : • 0.6 W/ft2 (Level 1) • 0.5 W/ft2 (Level 2 + 3) • Horizontal Illuminance: 10fc • Materials: A B A B Existing Walls Corridor Walls Ceiling Floor/Accent Wall
LIGHTING DEPTH – ATRIUM • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • Performance: • LPD • Level One = 0.62 • Level Two = 0.28 • Level Three = 0.35 • Complies Overall • Average Illuminance • One: 12.84 fc • Two: 12.54 fc • Three: 18.67 fc
DAYLIGHTING EXISTING SYSTEMS Available Daylight • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary
DAYLIGHTING • Proposed redesign • Electric Light Integration • - Open Loop Switching • - Three Zones • Energy Savings Summary • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary
ACOUSTICAL BREADTH • ACOUSTICS • Carpeting vs. Tile Flooring • Existing • Level One Replaced w/ Carpeting • All Atrium Flooring Replaced w/ Carpeting • Comparison at 1,000 Hz • Target Range: 1.3-1.9 s • Results: • RT = 1.75 • RT = 1.36 • RT = 1.16 • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary
LED STUDY LED Luminaire Options • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary • 21 luminaires arranged perpendicular to tables • 2) 16 luminaires parallel and in between lab tables Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Average Illuminance: 44.4 fc Payback Period: 16 years Average Illuminance: 41.5 fc Payback Period: 7 years
ELECTRICAL DEPTH • Motor Controller Center Design • Existing Distribution • Direct Replacement: Motor Loads = 2867.9 A • Removing Chillers: Motor Loads = 1341.9 A • -reduces size of incoming feeder bus • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary
PROJECT SUMMARY • summary • LIGHTING: Illuminated spaces to satisfy IESNA standards and ASHRAE power requirements • DAYLIGHTING: Reduced annual energy consumption by over 50% with integrated photosensor system • ACOUSTICS: Validated improvements with alternative flooring; not critical to implement • LED STUDY: Alternative general illumination system for labs insufficient • ELECTRICAL: MCC designed for mechanical penthouse is not practical • Introduction & Project Overview • Lighting Depth • Working Space • FacadeAtrium • Daylighting (MAE) • Acoustical Breadth • LED Study (Honors) • Electrical Depth • Project Summary
Acknowledgements Thank you to: AE FacultyCannon Design Family Classmates + Friends thank you