1 / 11

CAOT Computer Aided Optimization Tool

CAOT Computer Aided Optimization Tool. Institute of Metal Forming. Dr. rer. nat. Martin Franzke Innovationsforum Florianópolis 2008. Outline. C omputer A ided O ptimization (CAO) Introduction of CAOT ( C omputer A ided O ptimization T ool) Optimization of a drawing process

sanaa
Download Presentation

CAOT Computer Aided Optimization Tool

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CAOTComputer Aided Optimization Tool Institute of Metal Forming Dr. rer. nat. Martin Franzke Innovationsforum Florianópolis 2008

  2. Outline • Computer Aided Optimization (CAO) • Introduction of CAOT (Computer Aided Optimization Tool) • Optimization of a drawing process • Optimization of a process chain • Summary

  3. automatic evaluation target function value automatic optimizationprocedure combinatorial optimization methods Computer Aided Optimization (CAO) job new input data process model simulation program execution variation evaluation results

  4. m Z(p1, ..., pn)=Swk · penk(resk) k=1 Evaluation of target function value simulation res1 res2 resm results penalty terms pen1(res1) pen2(res2) penm(resm) w1· pen1(res1) w2· pen2(res2) wm· penm(resm) weighting target functionvalue 2 whereas penk(resk) = |desired value (resk) – actual value (resk) |

  5. force [0..200] temperature [0..800] 250 kN 912°C variance of 25% 625 variance of 14% 196 weight 1 625 weight 10 1960 z = 625 + 1960 = 2585 Evaluation of target function value – example simulation results penalty terms weighting target function value

  6. eij, sij a R d1 v z d0 lz Optimization of a drawing process Range/Initial Design parameter [1-6] / 3 [4-10] / 6 [3-30] / 15 Length of parallel lz Angle of inclination of drawing hole a Transition radius R

  7. Optimization of a drawing process 966,68 N/mm2 - 613,22 N/mm2 LARSTRAN/Shape Optimization objective: Decrease the tensile stress near the surface without decreasing the compressive strain in the middle of the wire essential by variation of the design parameters Restrictions: Range for tensile stress [0..800 N/mm2], range for compressive stress [-800..-600 N/mm2]

  8. Optimization of a drawing process optimized CAOTLARSTRAN/Shape 783,10 N/mm2 966,68 N/mm2 - 713,66 N/mm2 - 613,22 N/mm2 initial configuration

  9. Optimization of a process chain Initial blank flexible rolling cutting HBU cutting loading

  10. thickness [mm] Blechdicke in mm bending [mm] 1.400 1.500 1.367 0.916 1.333 0.333 1.300 -0.250 1.267 -0.833 1.233 -1.417 1.200 -2.000 Optimization of a process chain Optimization objective:Minimal bending under loading! Restriction:Weight less than 100%! blank with constant thickness Ta i lor Rolled Blank sheet thickness 1,4 0,8 1,2 – 1,4 1,2 – 1,4 2,55 (100%) 10,23 (400%) 1,48 (58%) bending 2,81 (110%) weight 100% 57% 80% 95% The maximum bending of the optimized component is 58% and the weight is 95% compared to the initial configuration!

  11. Summary • Automatic optimization of metal forming processes is applicable • The basic condition is to use a process model which covers the real process exactly • The computing time is still high in the case of using 3D-FEM • In the case of elementary or empirical models the introduced optimization system can deliver very fast significant process improvement

More Related